Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Sure, but if you're leaving in middle school for a worse DCPS public or charter, that's not why you're leaving -- you're leaving because the coursework was too much too soon.
Not necessarily true. The parents I know who chose BASIS because they saw it as a good school which they initially defined as great test scores, rigorous expectations (they valued their kids having AP in the middle grades) and what they deemed a high performing cohort of kids. They realized their kids could do well elsewhere but have more access to other types of schools offerings (arts in particular). They didn't think of the school they chose as "worse" though -- the test scores were good but not as good as BASIS. How are you defining a "worse DCPS public or charter"?
Substantially worse test scores, behavioral problems, and/or opportunities for acceleration. I'm not talking about Deal, Hardy, or Latin. But if you're leaving for a school where virtually none of the kids are testing at grade level, I don't think it's for access to a broader variety of middle school options. Especially if you're leaving after 6th or 7th.
Worse test scores for who? I would be totally comfortable sending my kid to a middle-of-the-road DCPS school, like Stuart Hobson or MacArthur or SWWFS, where the upper limit is still high, over BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Sure, but if you're leaving in middle school for a worse DCPS public or charter, that's not why you're leaving -- you're leaving because the coursework was too much too soon.
Not necessarily true. The parents I know who chose BASIS because they saw it as a good school which they initially defined as great test scores, rigorous expectations (they valued their kids having AP in the middle grades) and what they deemed a high performing cohort of kids. They realized their kids could do well elsewhere but have more access to other types of schools offerings (arts in particular). They didn't think of the school they chose as "worse" though -- the test scores were good but not as good as BASIS. How are you defining a "worse DCPS public or charter"?
Substantially worse test scores, behavioral problems, and/or opportunities for acceleration. I'm not talking about Deal, Hardy, or Latin. But if you're leaving for a school where virtually none of the kids are testing at grade level, I don't think it's for access to a broader variety of middle school options. Especially if you're leaving after 6th or 7th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Sure, but if you're leaving in middle school for a worse DCPS public or charter, that's not why you're leaving -- you're leaving because the coursework was too much too soon.
Not necessarily true. The parents I know who chose BASIS because they saw it as a good school which they initially defined as great test scores, rigorous expectations (they valued their kids having AP in the middle grades) and what they deemed a high performing cohort of kids. They realized their kids could do well elsewhere but have more access to other types of schools offerings (arts in particular). They didn't think of the school they chose as "worse" though -- the test scores were good but not as good as BASIS. How are you defining a "worse DCPS public or charter"?
Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Sure, but if you're leaving in middle school for a worse DCPS public or charter, that's not why you're leaving -- you're leaving because the coursework was too much too soon.
Anonymous wrote:No gym, stage, library, grass, language instruction before 8th grade. No instrumental music program, serious sports or arts. High, chronic teacher turnover. Weak leadership and v. uneven ms instruction in core subjects. All course work done by the end of jr year in HS. These aren’t minor weaknesses. Families with the dough for private high schools leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is pretty telling how many posters are saying they left BASIS...for private.
What is it telling?
Tells us the issue isn't BASIS as much as it is the options in DC. It is one thing to say you moved on from BASIS to another DCPS or charter school and explain your reasons. Quite another to say why BASIS wasn't a good school and then explain that nothing was and you paid for private. I think it also instructive as to the type of parents BASIS attracts. Lots of 2 parent households with grad degrees and very academically minded. If you sent your kid to BASIS expecting Sidwell or private school, the issue isn't BASIS, it is you and your misguided expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is pretty telling how many posters are saying they left BASIS...for private.
What is it telling?
Anonymous wrote:It is pretty telling how many posters are saying they left BASIS...for private.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another downside of BASIS is that it attracts families who are high-maintenance and like to complain about everything. Unlike Latin, which attracts parents who are chill and know how to enjoy life. If Latin Cooper has 6th grade seats, it might be a good idea to switch.
I'm listing Latin first, but if my kid gets into BASIS and not Latin, my kid will go to BASIS. The overlap between parents considering each of these schools must be huge.
It is, but it really shouldn’t be. These schools are so different from one another.