Anonymous
07/05/2025 16:00
Subject: Arlington Little League vs. Babe Ruth, which is better?
Babe Ruth goes to 50-70 field with leads, pickoffs, and full MLB rules at age 11, some age 10's
Bigger field = longer throws. Pitching while holding runners, not balking, pickoffs, pickoff plays, 1st and 3rds. A lot more baseball.
LL remains 46-60 and no leads, pickoffs, etc. Small field, same size as a T-ball.
Babe Ruth is better for player development. I'd pick that.
Bigger field = longer throws. Pitching while holding runners, not balking, pickoffs, pickoff plays, 1st and 3rds. A lot more baseball.
LL remains 46-60 and no leads, pickoffs, etc. Small field, same size as a T-ball.
Babe Ruth is better for player development. I'd pick that.
Anonymous
07/05/2025 13:52
Subject: Arlington Little League vs. Babe Ruth, which is better?
Babe Ruth might have some better coaching, but the district and state organization is like a corrupt mafia. The fields chosen for playoffs especially for All-Stars are through a good ole boy network . Those fields are dangerous and sub-par, usually in far off towns with little to no accommodations. Umpiring is worse than any league I’ve ever seen, and the teams ie…us parents pay for them..and God help you if you criticize. Now I’m talking 16-18 yr old division where this is the last chance any of these kids have to play.