Anonymous wrote:I was talking to a friend the other day who is adamant that 200k is not enough money to raise a kid on and to have savings and a nice life.
I thought she was SO out of touch!
Anonymous wrote:200k is basically our family income goal. Right now we are at around 130k, but I'm working part time (though that comes with a big savings in childcare at the moment, so it's worth it). Hoping to get there in the next 5 years though, as I transition to full time work and DH likely moves up a level at work.
The trick is that we already own our home and only have one child. Moving to 200k without moving from a house where we already have a ton of equity, and then not shifting our lifestyle at all, means that money will be a massive boost in terms of college and retirement savings. We are already very frugal.
It's totally possible to do this. But not if you are determined to have multiple kids, live in a 3k square foot home in the best neighborhood, send kids to private schools, always have new clothes and nice furnishings, eat out a lot, always have a car or cars that are less than 5 years old, and take multiple nice vacations every year. But not one of those things is a necessity. You can have fewer kids and be very happy, no one needs as much space as they think, there are plenty of good publics out there if you are smart about it, clothes and furniture and cars still work and can even look nice when they are 5, 10, even 15 years old. And you can still travel plenty, and to interesting locations, on a budget -- we do a foreign trip only every other year, one of our vacations each year is a big road trip, and we have learned that with a very young child, this is a good time to take low-key and less expensive vacations to accessible destinations.
People often aren't very good at discerning between "needs" and "wants". You can have everything you need on 200k a year in this area (heck, I'm proof you can do that on 130k a year, though I'd like to be saving more). You will never, ever have everything you want. There are too many things to want! You just have to learn to live with that, no matter your income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:200K is the top 20% of HHI in the DC metropolitan area. If you feel you need to "compromise", you are an entitled spoiled brat whose completely out-of-touch with reality.
I'd love for you to link us a 4br+ 4000sf+ single family home in a top school district and low crime with a big yard, garage, and a 15 minute commute to downtown DC that you could afford on a $200K income while maxing out 2 401Ks, Roth IRAs, and 529s for 3 kids.
Because if you can't find all of that, you're going to have to give some of it up to be able to find something you can afford. And what's another word for giving things up to be able to get some of what you want? It starts with a "C..."
Agree. A comfortable, middle class to upper middle class lifestyle to me means:
- max out 401k(s) or IRA(s)
- adequately save in a 529 plan
- mortgage on a ~3000 SF house with a 2-car garage and a yard in a safe neighborhood in a good school district
- 2 vacations a year
- kids' activities (and child care if both parents work)
- family car(s)
$200,000 / year isn't enough for the above-described lifestyle. No chauffeurs or other extravagant expenses mentioned above.
That's not a middle class lifestyle, not in the US right now. Maybe it was for boomers but not today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$200K HHI would put you at the 79th percentile in the District. I think you’d be closer to 85th percentile in the DC metro area.
$200K is middle class inside the Beltway.
I don't understand how in the same statement you say "85th percentile" and then "middle class"
Anonymous wrote:$200K HHI would put you at the 79th percentile in the District. I think you’d be closer to 85th percentile in the DC metro area.
$200K is middle class inside the Beltway.
Anonymous wrote:taxes are very high in the USA where you lose about 60% so it's not really 200K it ends up being take home of like 134K which isn't much
https://www.yahoo.com/now/actually-home-200-000-salary-100000562.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$200K HHI would put you at the 79th percentile in the District. I think you’d be closer to 85th percentile in the DC metro area.
$200K is middle class inside the Beltway.
I wonder what the real percentile is when you eliminate the outliers. Take out the retirees, the young, single people, the drug addicts, the unmotivated that really don’t care to work much. If you could only include married couples with kids who are at least semi stable people, then I would imagine that 79th percentile does move somewhere near the median if you are using a comparison group that most here would use. If you further limit it to college grads from top 100 schools and dual income, then it’s likely below average. It matters who you compare yourself to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:200K is the top 20% of HHI in the DC metropolitan area. If you feel you need to "compromise", you are an entitled spoiled brat whose completely out-of-touch with reality.
I'd love for you to link us a 4br+ 4000sf+ single family home in a top school district and low crime with a big yard, garage, and a 15 minute commute to downtown DC that you could afford on a $200K income while maxing out 2 401Ks, Roth IRAs, and 529s for 3 kids.
Because if you can't find all of that, you're going to have to give some of it up to be able to find something you can afford. And what's another word for giving things up to be able to get some of what you want? It starts with a "C..."
Agree. A comfortable, middle class to upper middle class lifestyle to me means:
- max out 401k(s) or IRA(s)
- adequately save in a 529 plan
- mortgage on a ~3000 SF house with a 2-car garage and a yard in a safe neighborhood in a good school district
- 2 vacations a year
- kids' activities (and child care if both parents work)
- family car(s)
$200,000 / year isn't enough for the above-described lifestyle. No chauffeurs or other extravagant expenses mentioned above.
That's not a middle class lifestyle, not in the US right now. Maybe it was for boomers but not today.
This is like parents with a kid who got a 33 on ACT saying he is in 97%tile in US. It maybe a true statement but not in DMV. It's barely 50%tile or so (my guess) b/c so many kids get 34-36s. It's not a generational issue, it's a locality issue.
This is so out of touch too! Just bc there are a lot of people with high scores and high incomes doesn't make 200k income and 35 ACT the "middle". Look at actual data--that's top 20% HHI in the DMV and top 5% ACT scores in the DMV.
You are proving my point. It’s middle for this area. That was the whole point. Ugh…
Anonymous wrote:I agree with your friend op. I grew up dirt poor and am amazed by how much I make however when all is said and done I only bring home 30% of my income. That's after taxes, retirement and insurance costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$200K HHI would put you at the 79th percentile in the District. I think you’d be closer to 85th percentile in the DC metro area.
$200K is middle class inside the Beltway.
I wonder what the real percentile is when you eliminate the outliers. Take out the retirees, the young, single people, the drug addicts, the unmotivated that really don’t care to work much. If you could only include married couples with kids who are at least semi stable people, then I would imagine that 79th percentile does move somewhere near the median if you are using a comparison group that most here would use. If you further limit it to college grads from top 100 schools and dual income, then it’s likely below average. It matters who you compare yourself to.
Anonymous wrote:$200K HHI would put you at the 79th percentile in the District. I think you’d be closer to 85th percentile in the DC metro area.
$200K is middle class inside the Beltway.