Anonymous
06/22/2026 12:45
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
I'm kind of surprised she does her own grocery shopping. Even normies can get delivery, and she has assistants and stuff.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 12:31
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Maybe she just doesn't care.
We all know this isnt true. Blake accepeted an unfavorable settlemernent so that she could do the pap walk at the Met Gala.
+1. Her image is everything. Wondering if she’s trying to cover up weight gain or something - it reminds me of her it ends with us wardrobe where she did like three pairs of pants and a bunch of layers because she was self-conscious. It’s just such an odd choice. I don’t think she was expecting paps and they probably normally wouldn’t be there, but I think people did want clicks because she’s not at Taylor’s bachelorette weekend.
She looked thinner in other recent public appearances though. And actually she doesn't look heavy in these photos even wearing a dress over pants.
I actually think she just went to the grocery store wearing whatever she was wearing around the house and was not expecting to be photographed. They rarely are when in their upstate house.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 12:19
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Maybe she just doesn't care.
We all know this isnt true. Blake accepeted an unfavorable settlemernent so that she could do the pap walk at the Met Gala.
+1. Her image is everything. Wondering if she’s trying to cover up weight gain or something - it reminds me of her it ends with us wardrobe where she did like three pairs of pants and a bunch of layers because she was self-conscious. It’s just such an odd choice. I don’t think she was expecting paps and they probably normally wouldn’t be there, but I think people did want clicks because she’s not at Taylor’s bachelorette weekend.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 11:19
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Maybe she just doesn't care.
We all know this isnt true. Blake accepeted an unfavorable settlemernent so that she could do the pap walk at the Met Gala.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 11:17
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Maybe she just doesn't care.
Maybe it’s depression? I’m sure these past few years have taken a toll on her (i’m aware she bought her on herself but still) and the constant Taylor wedding news is probably not fun to read. I thought that they were going to the UK for the summer - seems like that would be less stressful.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 10:22
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Maybe she just doesn't care.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 10:19
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, why is she dressed like this? Is it not fairly warm in upside New York? Do you need some sort of weird house dress over jeans? This is very matronly.
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
To bait tabloids and juke Google SEO? You think a pap is following her around all day in upstate NY for a week in hopes she goes to a grocery store dressed like she’s mentally ill? It’s all so phony and fake.
I actually do assume a tabloid offered money fur pics of Lively this weekend because the story that she's not at Taylor's bachelorette will draw eyeballs. And it did.
I can't imagine why she'd want photos of herself in that outfit, no makeup, alone. I assume she was not expecting paparazzi there, based on how she usually dresses for pap walks.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 10:06
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Is it some sort of trad wife code? The house dress over jeans seems very Christian fundamentalist.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
I totally get having your hair swept up in a bun and being in jeans and a T-shirt running to the store but a house dress and a long sleeve shirt in the summer? It really makes no sense and if she was trying to blend in I feel like she stands out more. A dress over jeans is not something most people do.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 09:57
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:OK, why is she dressed like this? Is it not fairly warm in upside New York? Do you need some sort of weird house dress over jeans? This is very matronly.
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
She has the worst personal style of any public figure, particularly given what she spends and her age. Those women who look unreal at Mar-A-Lago are often better styled. She isn’t pretty and is dumpy AF. But hey I’m sure she’s #winning with her one-sided PR war against her former BFF.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 09:13
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:OK, why is she dressed like this? Is it not fairly warm in upside New York? Do you need some sort of weird house dress over jeans? This is very matronly.
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
To bait tabloids and juke Google SEO? You think a pap is following her around all day in upstate NY for a week in hopes she goes to a grocery store dressed like she’s mentally ill? It’s all so phony and fake.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 07:43
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:OK, why is she dressed like this? Is it not fairly warm in upside New York? Do you need some sort of weird house dress over jeans? This is very matronly.
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
To annoy you, of course.
Anonymous
06/22/2026 07:32
Subject: Re:Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
OK, why is she dressed like this? Is it not fairly warm in upside New York? Do you need some sort of weird house dress over jeans? This is very matronly.
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
https://pagesix.com/2026/06/21/entertainment/blake-lively-grocery-shops-while-former-bff-taylor-swift-throws-bachelorette-party-with-closest-pals/
Anonymous
06/22/2026 07:17
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Dueling narratives from both Taylor's and Blake's camps on whether she was invited to Taylor's wedding. DM is reporting that Blake was invited, but it's uncertain whether she'll actually show up, while Entertainment Tonight (one of Taylor's preferred mouthpieces) quickly squashed that claim and said she wasn't. OOPS!
It is making Blake and Ryan look really desperate. They obviously planted the stories and it seems Taylor lets a lot of it go, but for whatever reason her team was not having this one. The ET story is obviously Taylor’s team…for them to want it refute it they’re just not playing games.
Add to that that it’s speculated with all the activity and Taylor’s best friend Abigail seen at the Rhode Island mansion that her bachelorette was this weekend. Blake was photographed in Pound Ridge, New York.
Anonymous
06/21/2026 21:54
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Dueling narratives from both Taylor's and Blake's camps on whether she was invited to Taylor's wedding. DM is reporting that Blake was invited, but it's uncertain whether she'll actually show up, while Entertainment Tonight (one of Taylor's preferred mouthpieces) quickly squashed that claim and said she wasn't. OOPS!
Anonymous
06/17/2026 19:58
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:I mean, not everything is some huge conspiracy from Lively. The letter refers to Gottlieb being on vacation and I generally think the lawyers just don't want to cram through this in a week across multiple law firms.
I did laugh when they asked for clarification if Liman is looking for additional briefing, I'm sure he's like "Lord, no!" And they should have been prepared to submit if they got a favorable decision on fees. But I doubt Lively or Reynolds have any big involvement in apportioning the bills.
I wasn’t saying it was a conspiracy, just wondering why they don’t want to wrap this the hell up.