This family is full of sick people. Wtf?!?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11813343/Murdaughs-home-accused-killing-wife-son-STAGED-jury-walk-through.htmlI'm

They have reached a verdict!

Lots of places on land of that size to stash the gun and clothes. Old wells, septic tanks, etc.

Anonymous wrote:Good sleuths if DCUM:
- what exactly do you think happened?
- did Alex shoot one person, then the other? In what order?
- is the absence of the murder weapon and other items the result of Alex’s family removing them from the home that night / next couple of days?
- if not Alex, who shot them? And was Alex present, and paid someone to do it? Who did it?

1. He did it.
2. Not sure who he killed first
3. Probably
4. See #1.

He called the housecleaner in on a Friday night to clean the house and do laundry.

Agree.

I think he slaughtered Paul and Maggie after luring them to ‘come on home’, why or his motive, we will never know bc it is not for a same person to understand. He washed himself off with the hose, the clothes seen in the video are gone, just like the guns with the same shell casing that can be found over in their shooting range. He took Maggie’s phone but decided not to fool with Paul’s, though admitted that he picked it up, because that’s normal to do over your son’s butchered body. His iPhone was left somewhere, unmoved during the murders. He could have showered back at the house, but was sure calculated to pick up a downy-smelling WHITE t-shirt as part of his plan of innocence. He lied about the amount of time he spent with his sleeping mother but made sure to sway/intimidate the caretaker to lie about the amount of time he was there, mobster style, so awfully that she cried on the witness stand. Same MO with the housekeeper about the clothes he wore in the video. If it looks like a duck acts like a 🦆GUILTY

I’ve invested way too much time watching this on Court TV, and have myself starting talkin’ in a Southern Drawl.
Yes there are many questions left unanswered but you mean to look me in the eye and tell me he didn’t do it?

Good sleuths if DCUM:
- what exactly do you think happened?
- did Alex shoot one person, then the other? In what order?
- is the absence of the murder weapon and other items the result of Alex’s family removing them from the home that night / next couple of days?
- if not Alex, who shot them? And was Alex present, and paid someone to do it? Who did it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t it be ironic that the smoking gun and downfall of this murderer will be thanks to his Gen-z son and his ever present phone use and social media, capturing his father’s voice on a Snapchat video, minutes before his diabolical father executes him and his mother. Paul’s video blows up Alex Murdaugh’s alibi.

How do you explain he cleaned himself of all evidence in short period of time? If he planned this like the prosecution would want you to believe, he would have picked a type of gun his family didn't own. So many questions, and reasonable doubt.

Addicts aren’t rational

But they clean a double murder scene in matter of minutes. Ok.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t it be ironic that the smoking gun and downfall of this murderer will be thanks to his Gen-z son and his ever present phone use and social media, capturing his father’s voice on a Snapchat video, minutes before his diabolical father executes him and his mother. Paul’s video blows up Alex Murdaugh’s alibi.

How do you explain he cleaned himself of all evidence in short period of time? If he planned this like the prosecution would want you to believe, he would have picked a type of gun his family didn't own. So many questions, and reasonable doubt.

Addicts aren’t rational

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t it be ironic that the smoking gun and downfall of this murderer will be thanks to his Gen-z son and his ever present phone use and social media, capturing his father’s voice on a Snapchat video, minutes before his diabolical father executes him and his mother. Paul’s video blows up Alex Murdaugh’s alibi.

How do you explain he cleaned himself of all evidence in short period of time? If he planned this like the prosecution would want you to believe, he would have picked a type of gun his family didn't own. So many questions, and reasonable doubt.

Anonymous wrote:This judge is the same judge of the Rittenhouse trial - hope he gets this one right.

No he’s not. Where did you get that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A juror was dismissed this morning for discussing the case with others. The ONE thing they are asked not to do. The judge announced it to her and everyone else in the courtroom, though he was very polite about it.

In true Murdaugh Trial fashion, she the asked the judge to let her go get her dozen eggs, a gift from a fellow juror, from the jury room before she left.

Mistral. He's innocent of all charges.

Give me a break. This is why they have alternates.

This guy isn't innocent of anything.

Anonymous wrote:A juror was dismissed this morning for discussing the case with others. The ONE thing they are asked not to do. The judge announced it to her and everyone else in the courtroom, though he was very polite about it.

In true Murdaugh Trial fashion, she the asked the judge to let her go get her dozen eggs, a gift from a fellow juror, from the jury room before she left.

Mistral. He's innocent of all charges.

A juror was dismissed this morning for discussing the case with others. The ONE thing they are asked not to do. The judge announced it to her and everyone else in the courtroom, though he was very polite about it.

In true Murdaugh Trial fashion, she the asked the judge to let her go get her dozen eggs, a gift from a fellow juror, from the jury room before she left.