Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
“The food at this place is terrible. And such tiny portions too!”
Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Well then it was a stupid waste of taxpayer money to build a little pool in a concrete bathtub in a once sylvan park. Most of the trees are gone and an ugly protuberance has spoiled what once a beautiful green canopy. It’s really desecration- the equivalent of putting hoops courts lit up by sodium lights in a national park.
The protuberance is horrid. We have been walking past the park for a year now and how the view has changed . If they could have made an infinity view or something... It's so choppy and generic where there was once a green vista.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Is it? Tiny kiddie pool with no water feature and like 4 lanes. Inspired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Well then it was a stupid waste of taxpayer money to build a little pool in a concrete bathtub in a once sylvan park. Most of the trees are gone and an ugly protuberance has spoiled what once a beautiful green canopy. It’s really desecration- the equivalent of putting hoops courts lit up by sodium lights in a national park.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is hideous. Hoping they out siding on it or whatever. Looks heinous now.
Maybe they clear cut so many trees to harvest siding for the ugly building....
Seriously, they need to have and carry out a vey significant reforestation plan for the south and west slopes of the park, DPR has not provided any plan yet, unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
It is the same size as most of the other outdoor DPR pools. That was what was said from the outset.
Anonymous wrote:The pool looks SO tiny. I was opposed to that location for the pool, but if you are going to ramrod it through, build a decent pool.
Anonymous wrote:It is hideous. Hoping they out siding on it or whatever. Looks heinous now.
Anonymous wrote:It is hideous. Hoping they out siding on it or whatever. Looks heinous now.