Anonymous wrote:How goes the prospective players training with your daughter’s teams? exciting or just meh so far?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched FCV. Wasn't impressed. They are very low nationally. None of them getting call ups.
Here are their U14s in action if anyone wants to judge for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAfrMqUHSs
It's pretty good soccer IMO - keeping in mind the level of opposition is also high. Both teams are organized defensively, marking well and closing down quickly. There isn't a whole of time and space on the ball for anybody.
For all you haters out there - if you are going to post criticism, please also post a video of a same-aged team playing as well or better. Our recollections are often misleading.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is true. The old 04/05 team was the first to enter FCV as a U9 group. And there are only 2 of those 04 girls and 4 of those 05 girls still with the club. The players you see in the DA have mostly come from all other places.
Agree and the poster that keeps saying the DA teams will just a rebadge of the existing teams has no clue. That’s not what happens.
the current arlington parents will raise holy hell if their daughters are not placed on the new Arlington DA teams. Could be interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is true. The old 04/05 team was the first to enter FCV as a U9 group. And there are only 2 of those 04 girls and 4 of those 05 girls still with the club. The players you see in the DA have mostly come from all other places.
Agree and the poster that keeps saying the DA teams will just a rebadge of the existing teams has no clue. That’s not what happens.
Anonymous wrote:this is true. The old 04/05 team was the first to enter FCV as a U9 group. And there are only 2 of those 04 girls and 4 of those 05 girls still with the club. The players you see in the DA have mostly come from all other places.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Fcv develops its own players. Most of the weak spots on their DA teams come from the outside players that they took. The club is very tough evaluating their own players for sure. Then they regret it once the season starts because those players don’t play the ‘FcV way’. As a parent from the club for 7 years I’ve watched the games and within minutes been able to pick out players and ask ‘where did they come from’. It’s the decision making, holding the ball for more than 1 touch, large first touches. Things fcv players are taught from the beginning they should or shouldn’t do. Loudoun players and the style hasn’t been a great fit for them... thus Loudoun desire to do their own thing. The Loudoun style of soccer, while very successful, just isn’t the same style.
FCV?!? Prior to their taking over Ashburn soccer club, FCV did not field teams younger than the ECNL age groups.
The current 01s trace their lineage to SYA - and after a 1 year FCV / SYA teaming arrangement - FCV ripped away the players from SYA and went to Ashburn (u12 year for the 01s). I believe U12 was the first time that the current 01s played as FCV.
They may be doing a great job of developing their younger players, But for 03 and above - all the players played U9 under a different organization.
Anonymous wrote:I think Fcv develops its own players. Most of the weak spots on their DA teams come from the outside players that they took. The club is very tough evaluating their own players for sure. Then they regret it once the season starts because those players don’t play the ‘FcV way’. As a parent from the club for 7 years I’ve watched the games and within minutes been able to pick out players and ask ‘where did they come from’. It’s the decision making, holding the ball for more than 1 touch, large first touches. Things fcv players are taught from the beginning they should or shouldn’t do. Loudoun players and the style hasn’t been a great fit for them... thus Loudoun desire to do their own thing. The Loudoun style of soccer, while very successful, just isn’t the same style.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched FCV. Wasn't impressed. They are very low nationally. None of them getting call ups.
Here are their U14s in action if anyone wants to judge for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAfrMqUHSs
It's pretty good soccer IMO - keeping in mind the level of opposition is also high. Both teams are organized defensively, marking well and closing down quickly. There isn't a whole of time and space on the ball for anybody.
For all you haters out there - if you are going to post criticism, please also post a video of a same-aged team playing as well or better. Our recollections are often misleading.
I am sure most parents would not like video of their kids posted here without consent. They are children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched FCV. Wasn't impressed. They are very low nationally. None of them getting call ups.
Here are their U14s in action if anyone wants to judge for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAfrMqUHSs
It's pretty good soccer IMO - keeping in mind the level of opposition is also high. Both teams are organized defensively, marking well and closing down quickly. There isn't a whole of time and space on the ball for anybody.
For all you haters out there - if you are going to post criticism, please also post a video of a same-aged team playing as well or better. Our recollections are often misleading.
I am sure most parents would not like video of their kids posted here without consent. They are children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched FCV. Wasn't impressed. They are very low nationally. None of them getting call ups.
Here are their U14s in action if anyone wants to judge for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAfrMqUHSs
It's pretty good soccer IMO - keeping in mind the level of opposition is also high. Both teams are organized defensively, marking well and closing down quickly. There isn't a whole of time and space on the ball for anybody.
For all you haters out there - if you are going to post criticism, please also post a video of a same-aged team playing as well or better. Our recollections are often misleading.
Anonymous wrote:I watched FCV. Wasn't impressed. They are very low nationally. None of them getting call ups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What club around here actually develops its own players
No club does. The club and team are just one piece of the important puzzle. Focus on the good aspects of the club, and try to avoid the bad aspects. Don't be bitter and bail and say all clubs are evil. Don't be a lemming and do everything your club says. Lay low, don't get heavily involved with the politics. Stay on the periphery, because that is where the rest of the puzzle will come from. Training on your own, in other clubs winter programs, in a summer camp or totally unrelated environment, etc., etc. The more you focus on that part of the puzzle, the more you will see development. Even a great team or great coach (something that if you find is of course a HUGE plus) will only take your player so far. The club even less, it is just there as a necessary, sometimes fun, often unfun, pre-requisite to developing with other good players (that often are friends of your player which makes it more "fun") in a lot of cases, but not all cases. I am talking mainly about the development from U8 to maybe U13-14 here. I think other variables come into play when older. But at the younger developing age just try to get as many challenges and experiences from as many different sources as possible. No one club gives you that, and don't buy the hype from the club. It helps if someone in your family understands or played soccer. You will meet a LOT of parents though that do the Buy-In, so as I said just stay on the fringes and don't get all wrapped up with them. Less time with the club's agenda and programming means more time to train, get touches, etc.
I think you will get a lot of different opinions on this from the personalities on this board though. People tend to go to extremes on this subject.