Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a move to sue the principal in addition to the school? I've heard rumors about this....
I would like this conversation to move to the other board about this and keep this about the consolidated campus. Thanks much.
And I would like to win the powerball tonight.
The issues aren't unrelated. Why would LAMB's board, which has its hands full, be trying to do this now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a move to sue the principal in addition to the school? I've heard rumors about this....
I would like this conversation to move to the other board about this and keep this about the consolidated campus. Thanks much.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a move to sue the principal in addition to the school? I've heard rumors about this....
Anonymous wrote:LAMB has hired an outside nonprofit called Charter Board Partners (google them) to look at their board composition, gaps and procedures in light of the assault. There are no constraints on their advice or recommendations. It includes illuminating gaps in Board members' skills, identification of others to join the Board.
LAMB has also hired a national private investigatory firm based in New York to try to piece together all of what happened when Fernandez was on staff. They were just given a green light to begin by MPD and the prosecutor.
There's another group reviewing their personnel racyoces and student safety procedures to identify gaps and recommend changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you bought a house near SD and now pretend to be surprised and outraged that LAMB is a Ward 4 school then take your child out and attend your neighborhood school or better yet demand your councilman to provide good bilingual schools in your neighborhood don't try to force LAMB to pay for buses to make your life easier. You said that you were going to pull your child when it was time to go to WR, well then maybe you need to pull your child this year and stop being so angry because you didn't get your way. Enough already! I don't see the poor blacks or Latinos complaining, you know why? Because they don't feel entitled like you do and they will take buses and organize carpools to get their kids to school because they recognize how lucky they are to be part of a great school. You won the lottery when you applied and got into LAMB and you knew there was no bus. If you want a bus then pay for it othrwise do as everyone else does and drive your kid to wherever LAMB relocates if you want your child to get a private style education for free.
This is just a side note....maybe I will start another thread in the future....however.... I really don't understand why there is always an assumption on DCUM that blacks and latinos are poor? I find these statements rather ignorant and off-putting!
Anonymous wrote:If you bought a house near SD and now pretend to be surprised and outraged that LAMB is a Ward 4 school then take your child out and attend your neighborhood school or better yet demand your councilman to provide good bilingual schools in your neighborhood don't try to force LAMB to pay for buses to make your life easier. You said that you were going to pull your child when it was time to go to WR, well then maybe you need to pull your child this year and stop being so angry because you didn't get your way. Enough already! I don't see the poor blacks or Latinos complaining, you know why? Because they don't feel entitled like you do and they will take buses and organize carpools to get their kids to school because they recognize how lucky they are to be part of a great school. You won the lottery when you applied and got into LAMB and you knew there was no bus. If you want a bus then pay for it othrwise do as everyone else does and drive your kid to wherever LAMB relocates if you want your child to get a private style education for free.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you are right. Read through the minutes of the meeting. I don't think the Kingsbury move will ever happen. If it does it will be something like 2029.
I also think the politics of this are really complex.
OSSE is paying for 75 special students to attend Kingsbury now (vast majority were from DCPS; about 18 from various charters). That means the city has an interest in what happens with that school/facility.
So while this isn't a DCPS facility, the State Superintendent and DME are stakeholders in a way that they wouldn't be otherwise.
I can't figure out why the Board is even considering doing this now. They are going through a management review, and a board review. It's likely there will be Board turnover, and they may be turnover in the administration.
Everyone should just hold tight for the next 12 months -- rather than potentially tying the hands of a new leadership team.
Anonymous wrote:There isn't going to be any administrative overhaul at LAMB. The hope for years has been to put everyone at the same campus. Now there is a wonderful opportunity to do just that, steps away from the "original" Misouri) campus, in a building anyone with eyes has been ogling for at least a decade. I am fully confident that this will go forward, and quickly. It is a winning situation for everyone involved. SD Ave is not a viable long term option due to flooding issues in the portion rented from Perry St, over which LAMB has no control but which cause damage and stress. Start planning.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are right. Read through the minutes of the meeting. I don't think the Kingsbury move will ever happen. If it does it will be something like 2029.