Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, would you counsel a younger women to do what you are doing? I know you said you do not want kids so not a daughter, but any of the kids whom you tutor?
No, because I think most people are dating with the goal of marriage/kids and this won't lead there. I'm fine with that but know most wouldn't be.
What if they were not either?
I wasn't looking to get married and have kids when I was 24. Heck no. I was out dating lots of single/available men, working, hanging with friends, establishing my own life.
You don't have to be either desperate to get married OR a kept woman. There is a lot in between.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New poster.
I have met several kept women in my life. Detached is a very good word to describe them- detached from their own self I would say. Their level of introspection is very low. They just don't get all those "fine matters" such as feelings, emotions, etc- and are not really interested in them. They are very straightforward in their thinking about things. Family is normal if there are no big fights and everyone gets together for holidays. Their life is fine as long as there is enough money, they are healthy, and good looking.
They are fascinating to me, who is very introspective and introverted in the Jungian sense. Seems like they don't complicate things.
Well, it's pretty clear that her family life is not too deep. It's hard to imagine my parents not asking for any details about how I am supporting myself, or at a bare minimum, if I have a job! Very odd.
+1 I picked up on this too in her earlier post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New poster.
I have met several kept women in my life. Detached is a very good word to describe them- detached from their own self I would say. Their level of introspection is very low. They just don't get all those "fine matters" such as feelings, emotions, etc- and are not really interested in them. They are very straightforward in their thinking about things. Family is normal if there are no big fights and everyone gets together for holidays. Their life is fine as long as there is enough money, they are healthy, and good looking.
They are fascinating to me, who is very introspective and introverted in the Jungian sense. Seems like they don't complicate things.
Well, it's pretty clear that her family life is not too deep. It's hard to imagine my parents not asking for any details about how I am supporting myself, or at a bare minimum, if I have a job! Very odd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, would you counsel a younger women to do what you are doing? I know you said you do not want kids so not a daughter, but any of the kids whom you tutor?
No, because I think most people are dating with the goal of marriage/kids and this won't lead there. I'm fine with that but know most wouldn't be.
What if they were not either?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, would you counsel a younger women to do what you are doing? I know you said you do not want kids so not a daughter, but any of the kids whom you tutor?
No, because I think most people are dating with the goal of marriage/kids and this won't lead there. I'm fine with that but know most wouldn't be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG, this is still going on? Looks like OP found DCUM's raw nerve...
More like every married women's darkest fear or source of paranoia.
Anonymous wrote:OP, would you counsel a younger women to do what you are doing? I know you said you do not want kids so not a daughter, but any of the kids whom you tutor?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I had affairs with married men without even getting dinner dates, much less a car or apartment, out of it. How did you broach the subject of wanting him to support you, or did he offer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will you do if you get pregnant? If you get an STD?
I'd abort. I'd get the STD treated.
I know you all think since he'll cheat on his wife with me, he'll cheat on me. You're entitled to your opinion. But I know him and I don't think he's "cheating" on me, and I'm entitled to my opinion too.
According to you, this sex maniac man willingly got engaged and married to a low sex drive wife. Not that long ago, either. You don't see anything at all funny about that?
Can you imagine yourself *marrying* a man who did not need or want sex?
For all you know this guy could be bisexual and he has a male paramour on the side with a similar arrangement to your own. Bottom line is - you don't really know this man at all.
NP here who was once in a nearly identical situation as OP. For five years he told me he loved me and that I was the only one he was sleeping with. It turned out that not only was he still occasionally seeing the girlfriend I had "replaced," he was also seeing dommes and tranny prostitutes every chance he got. If someone can hide ten years of intense affairs (think nearly constant contact, multiple visits per week, hundreds of nights away from home) and hundreds of thousands of dollars from their spouse, you better believe that is just the tip of the iceberg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. And this thread started at noon today, and she's still been Johnny-on-the-spot, answering questions (as she chooses), for 12 HOURS.
On DCUM, that would hardly make her suspicious or unique.
Anonymous wrote:I think you have to ask yourself what a 24 year old with no kids, no interest in kids, and no job involving kids is doing on a parenting site.
Anonymous wrote:I wish my husband was rich enough to keep a "kept woman" on the side. Then maybe he wouldn't pester me 2 to 3 times a f'n day for sex.