Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hated this season and thought that Sophie was SO poorly cast.
It's funny, I thought the actress was actually really good and the role reasonably well-written in parts. But at the same time, I also thought it really didn't "work." I did not buy--or even really understand--Sophie's connection to Benedict--or even to the larger Bridgerton family. So I sort of liked the character but it was like she was cut-and-paste out of a different story and plunked down in an awkward, unworkable Cinderella-Benedict character arc.
She was so blah, and frankly not beautiful enough to have completely won over BB in one scene.
Stop telling on yourself. She is absolutely beautiful.
+1 if you don’t think Sophie is beautiful, then certainly Kate is not.
DP I do not think Sophie is beautiful. I do think she is attractive, but beautiful is not how I would describe her. I would describe the actress who played the kind-hearted stepsister as beautiful. Kate is beautiful
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don’t think Kate is beautiful at all. I thought Edwina was prettier than Kate.
Kate is darker than Edwina, and a lot of people cannot see beyond the dark complexion to recognize beauty. But anyone looking at Simone Ashley and not seeing beauty is blind and/or prejudiced against darker skin. That does not take anything away from the actress Charithra Chandra, who played Edwina.
https://www.elle.com/culture/movies-tv/a39670256/simone-ashley-interview-may-2022/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7592760/
Anonymous wrote:Kate looks like Bridget from an American Tail, I will die on this hill.
![]()
OMG, she does! It’s the nose contour.Anonymous wrote:Kate looks like Bridget from an American Tail, I will die on this hill.
![]()
