Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demolishing the entire east wing with no approval. Just horrendous. And Congress is just standing by allowing this to happen.
It’s not the entire East wing, it’s just like an awning that you drive or walk under. Whatever you call that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demolishing the entire east wing with no approval. Just horrendous. And Congress is just standing by allowing this to happen.
It’s not the entire East wing, it’s just like an awning that you drive or walk under. Whatever you call that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The liberal fatigue is real. They are so anti trump , bad on everything that America doesn't take them seriously. Cried wolf soon many times that even semi valid points are ignored. They played themselves.
Yeah, that image of the one partially demolished wall of one wing of the White House will play real well with people who don't usually pay attention to politics.
Fixed it for you. Get your facts straight.
Anonymous wrote:Two things Jeff noted in blog today :
1. “Completed in 1942 to house the first lady’s office and support staff, the now-former East Wing presents significant engineering challenges. Any addition must maintain structural independence while protecting the historic building’s load paths, vibration limits and façade integrity.”
2. Trump is demanding $230 million be paid to him by taxpayers because he had his feelings hurt when his ridiculous and illegal behavior was called out. He hinted that he would use this to fund the ballroom.
Frankly, if my tax dollars are used to pay trump for his horrifying behavior, that will be the final straw. That is intolerable.
Anonymous wrote:The worthless construction company doing the demolition illegally on our white house is ACECO, out of silver spring. They often work with Clark Construction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not destroying the White House. They are adding a ballroom. They are not tearing down the East Wing, they are adding a ballroom. They took down the facade.
Why do they need a ballroom? Do you really think that having State dinners in a tent is a good thing? That is what they have been doing. As well as being second class, it is a security issue.
Taxpayers are not paying for it.
I can’t believe he lied! Just kidding. OF COURSE he lied.
Yep. Remember the Bonwit Teller building/Trump Tower travesty of the late 70s/early 80s in NYC? He's been a lying despicable b*st*rd his entire life, including childhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demolishing the entire east wing with no approval. Just horrendous. And Congress is just standing by allowing this to happen.
It’s not the entire East wing, it’s just like an awning that you drive or walk under. Whatever you call that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demolishing the entire east wing with no approval. Just horrendous. And Congress is just standing by allowing this to happen.
It’s not the entire East wing, it’s just like an awning that you drive or walk under. Whatever you call that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not destroying the White House. They are adding a ballroom. They are not tearing down the East Wing, they are adding a ballroom. They took down the facade.
Why do they need a ballroom? Do you really think that having State dinners in a tent is a good thing? That is what they have been doing. As well as being second class, it is a security issue.
Taxpayers are not paying for it.
I can’t believe he lied! Just kidding. OF COURSE he lied.
Yep. Remember the Bonwit Teller building/Trump Tower travesty of the late 70s/early 80s in NYC? He's been a lying despicable b*st*rd his entire life, including childhood.
Anonymous wrote:The worthless construction company doing the demolition illegally on our white house is ACECO, out of silver spring. They often work with Clark Construction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not destroying the White House. They are adding a ballroom. They are not tearing down the East Wing, they are adding a ballroom. They took down the facade.
Why do they need a ballroom? Do you really think that having State dinners in a tent is a good thing? That is what they have been doing. As well as being second class, it is a security issue.
Taxpayers are not paying for it.
I can’t believe he lied! Just kidding. OF COURSE he lied.
Anonymous wrote:Demolishing the entire east wing with no approval. Just horrendous. And Congress is just standing by allowing this to happen.