Anonymous wrote:Since the media has decided this thug is their poster child for wrongful deportation, maybe they can invite Kilmar Abrego Garcia to live on their street and carry out his gang activities in their neighborhood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Photo shopped

https://bsky.app/profile/reportbywilson.bsky.social/post/3ln2nq5pebc2u

You should think twice before believing things told to you by murderous dictators

Nope scroll further. Not photoshopped.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty incredible how the lefts voted into power pour in so much money and effort for noncitizens, right down to defending an undocumented individual who is likely a gang member. Imagine if they put that same energy into helping actual Americans. The irony is, they will not even lift a finger for fired left leaning government workers or vote against Trump’s budget bill. It’s "undocumented first," every time.

The very people who voted for these Democrats should feel completely betrayed. And let’s not forget another top priority for them: making sure biological men can compete in women’s sports. It is all part of the same strategy: expand their future voter base through colleges, visas, and immigration pathways. They do not even have to worry about keeping their current Democrat base happy because they know they will keep pushing that vote button no matter what.

I am a moderate and following this case not because I think this man is innocent but because I am concerned when our executive leadership does not follow our own laws, constitution, supreme court ruling. If you are fine with the executive not following the judiciary, that WILL bite you in the ass when it is a different party in power. It is noteworthy that other than the joke of Fox News, other conservative outlets such as National Review have written articles criticizing the Trump administration on this case.

It is not just Democrats who are concerned, and if you think that, you are not paying attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God for Van Hollen. All of our due process rights depend on Americans paying attention to this case and demanding those rights for this man, who is a human being and is entitled to certain rights under our laws. Sorry if you want to dehumanize him so Trump can deport anyone he doesn't like.

He may get further due process, but may still ultimately never return to the U.S. It's quite possible that there will be a rehearing on his deportation hold to El Salvador because it is a far different country than it was in 2019 (from a gang perspective). Would everyone here agree that if that hold is lifted, he can be deported to El Salvador?

Everyone agrees that if the government follows the laws and gives this man due process it may ultimately mean he is lawfully and legally deported to a country that is not El Salvador, per his protection order, and is not PRISON. Yes.

Whether he remains in prison is up to Bukele if the order of protection is lifted. If Bukele decides under El Salvador law that Garcia remains there (as an El Salvador citizen) what can the US do? That would be consistent with the Supreme Courts ruling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It isn’t just Democrats who are fighting for this guy; the courts are as well. The law is in his favor; he can’t be deported without due process.

Perhaps, but define due process? It's not clear what that entails. This was a political move by Bukele and helps Trump. Garcia will not be released by Bukele. The order of protection will likely be lifted based on official El Salvador statements that the country is much safer now and there is no risk of harm. The Trump administration will use its executive discretion to justify deportation (whatever the law or regulations allow). An immigration hearing will be held, likely at the US embassy, because Bukele will not allow Garcia to leave the country (and he has no diplomatic status). Remote hearings are allowed under current statute and regulations.

Bottom line, he will get his due process but likely never return to the US. The story will continue to dominate the news cycle, distracting from the tariff turmoil, and further allow Democrats to tie themselves to immigration as and issue for the mid terms in 2026.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God for Van Hollen. All of our due process rights depend on Americans paying attention to this case and demanding those rights for this man, who is a human being and is entitled to certain rights under our laws. Sorry if you want to dehumanize him so Trump can deport anyone he doesn't like.

He may get further due process, but may still ultimately never return to the U.S. It's quite possible that there will be a rehearing on his deportation hold to El Salvador because it is a far different country than it was in 2019 (from a gang perspective). Would everyone here agree that if that hold is lifted, he can be deported to El Salvador?

Everyone agrees that if the government follows the laws and gives this man due process it may ultimately mean he is lawfully and legally deported to a country that is not El Salvador, per his protection order, and is not PRISON. Yes.

Whether he remains in prison is up to Bukele if the order of protection is lifted. If Bukele decides under El Salvador law that Garcia remains there (as an El Salvador citizen) what can the US do? That would be consistent with the Supreme Courts ruling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Such suffering.

Margaritas with an alleged wife beater who was arrested wearing gang symbols chilling with MS 13 members and deported for being illegal. What a hill to die on Maryland. Maryland is for . . the wealthy, wife beaters, and gangs. Glad I left.

Let's say it loudly for the ones in the back of the room. He was deported because he doesn't have the right to be in the U.S.

He was deported because he was illegally in the U.S. Additionally, his record indicates he's a garbage human being. Any of you want this man living next door to you, along with his gang buddies? Say it loudly so everyone can hear.

He was not deported. Deportation is a legal process that the did not go through.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Photo shopped

https://bsky.app/profile/reportbywilson.bsky.social/post/3ln2nq5pebc2u

You should think twice before believing things told to you by murderous dictators

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Such suffering.

Margaritas with an alleged wife beater who was arrested wearing gang symbols chilling with MS 13 members and deported for being illegal. What a hill to die on Maryland. Maryland is for . . the wealthy, wife beaters, and gangs. Glad I left.

Let's say it loudly for the ones in the back of the room. He was deported because he doesn't have the right to be in the U.S.

He was deported because he was illegally in the U.S. Additionally, his record indicates he's a garbage human being. Any of you want this man living next door to you, along with his gang buddies? Say it loudly so everyone can hear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God for Van Hollen. All of our due process rights depend on Americans paying attention to this case and demanding those rights for this man, who is a human being and is entitled to certain rights under our laws. Sorry if you want to dehumanize him so Trump can deport anyone he doesn't like.

He may get further due process, but may still ultimately never return to the U.S. It's quite possible that there will be a rehearing on his deportation hold to El Salvador because it is a far different country than it was in 2019 (from a gang perspective). Would everyone here agree that if that hold is lifted, he can be deported to El Salvador?

Everyone agrees that if the government follows the laws and gives this man due process it may ultimately mean he is lawfully and legally deported to a country that is not El Salvador, per his protection order, and is not PRISON. Yes.

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here another post from the bukele about the meeting they drank some margaritas

Such suffering.

Margaritas with an alleged wife beater who was arrested wearing gang symbols chilling with MS 13 members and deported for being illegal. What a hill to die on Maryland. Maryland is for . . the wealthy, wife beaters, and gangs. Glad I left.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God for Van Hollen. All of our due process rights depend on Americans paying attention to this case and demanding those rights for this man, who is a human being and is entitled to certain rights under our laws. Sorry if you want to dehumanize him so Trump can deport anyone he doesn't like.

He may get further due process, but may still ultimately never return to the U.S. It's quite possible that there will be a rehearing on his deportation hold to El Salvador because it is a far different country than it was in 2019 (from a gang perspective). Would everyone here agree that if that hold is lifted, he can be deported to El Salvador?

Why are you trying to crowdsource legal opinions? Weird.

Anonymous wrote:It isn’t just Democrats who are fighting for this guy; the courts are as well. The law is in his favor; he can’t be deported without due process.