Anonymous wrote:my kids chem hons teacher came recenrly from some random high school in the mid-west.
just went through slides covering basic fcps chem hons materials.
exams were “tj level”. big disconnect. half the class got Bs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well
Such nonsense. The new system is more merit-based than the previous one, where people just purchased admissions.
Certainly, the shift toward merit restoration has started with the principal change, but fully removing DEI from all aspects of TJ will take time.
That will never happen. At TJ or anywhere else. Suck it.
DEI bye bye. [B]Merit URMs deserve their rightful spot upfront, and cant be undermined by lottery URMs[b].
Anonymous wrote:my kids chem hons teacher came recenrly from some random high school in the mid-west.
just went through slides covering basic fcps chem hons materials.
exams were “tj level”. big disconnect. half the class got Bs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well
Such nonsense. The new system is more merit-based than the previous one, where people just purchased admissions.
Certainly, the shift toward merit restoration has started with the principal change, but fully removing DEI from all aspects of TJ will take time.
That will never happen. At TJ or anywhere else. Suck it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kill dei
Replacing the principal midyear seems to be a step in that direction. The drop in rankings may have led to the realization that there is no substitute for merit in advanced academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new TJ principal is exactly the principal that the school has needed for years. Everyone is happier.
It's been a problematic environment - at different ways at different times - essentially since Geoff Jones left back in 2001. If FCPS allows him to, Mukai could absolutely get TJ back to that place where it deserves to be.
It's there already and better than ever.
In what ways is TJ better with the new principal?
DP
He has these town halls and he is very frank. He talks about college and stress and how he would navigate TJ if his kids were there. This is the info that the families need. He wants the kids to be successful not just diverse (he wants diverse but that's not the ultimate goal)
How exactly did he phrase that?
Or maybe he didn’t say that but it fits into PP’s narrative.
Or maybe we finally have a principal that puts excellence and academic success ahead of a well curated palette of skin colors in the student population
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well
Such nonsense. The new system is more merit-based than the previous one, where people just purchased admissions.
Certainly, the shift toward merit restoration has started with the principal change, but fully removing DEI from all aspects of TJ will take time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well
Such nonsense. The new system is more merit-based than the previous one, where people just purchased admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should first remove the teachers who cant or wont teach at the level of the materials and exams that the students face.
completely agree. My kid has had 3-4 teachers over the past 4 years who just read off some basic slides that you could get in any FCPS high school.
But the questions on the exams are super hard and at a completely different level.
Under previous principal, DEI influenced teacher recruitment as well