Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:don't.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What problems could it possibly cause “down the road”? I’m genuinely asking you.
I didn’t change my name, partly because I have an established professional license and publications in my maiden name, partly because I didn’t want to give up part of my identity while he kept his. Seems an unfair way to start things out. I suggested that both of us change our names (to his mom’s maiden name) and he didn’t want to do that. He also didn’t pressure me to change to his name. I might have changed it at least for personal use if his surname was an easy one, but it’s not (neither is my maiden name). Oh well.
PS - 15 years in, three kids with his surname, and no problems because of it.
No one cares about your profession maiden name, Hillary Clinton took the last name and she's as lib and professional as they get.
People don't care about your professional name, especially in the digital age. Hillary Clinton is from a different time - apples and oranges. I don't compare myself to those of a different era - it's weird.
lol yea your maiden name is so key to your laptop job at some consulting shop or fed agency. You brainwashed girl bosses are a real hoot.
Anonymous wrote:don't.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What problems could it possibly cause “down the road”? I’m genuinely asking you.
I didn’t change my name, partly because I have an established professional license and publications in my maiden name, partly because I didn’t want to give up part of my identity while he kept his. Seems an unfair way to start things out. I suggested that both of us change our names (to his mom’s maiden name) and he didn’t want to do that. He also didn’t pressure me to change to his name. I might have changed it at least for personal use if his surname was an easy one, but it’s not (neither is my maiden name). Oh well.
PS - 15 years in, three kids with his surname, and no problems because of it.
No one cares about your profession maiden name, Hillary Clinton took the last name and she's as lib and professional as they get.
People don't care about your professional name, especially in the digital age. Hillary Clinton is from a different time - apples and oranges. I don't compare myself to those of a different era - it's weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women should be independent and make decisions for themselves. Their choices are their own. Unless they choose something I disagree with, like taking their husband’s surname, and then they’re antiquated, stupid, and succumbing the patriarchy.
Being a feminist doesn't mean agreeing with every choice women make. I wouldn't lecture a friend for changing her name, butthe reality is that this is something tgat's only expected from women, never from men, and unlike many other choices, a name change after marriage is only a thing because of a sexist tradition, not because it's practical.
Anonymous wrote:It’s very provincial.
Changing your name after marriage is not a common practice world wide. In a lot of instances, a husband and wife sharing a surname signals an incestuous relationship.
However, if you’ve never travelled out of the United Stares, I can see how one could assume this practice is universal. This is no different than a villager from a remote village assuming everyone practices female genital mutilation because it’s all they know.
Anonymous wrote:My sister didn't change her name when she married in her early 30s. She married a nice, successful guy who seemed to check all of the boxes. On paper. But it was so obvious to all of us she never genuinely loved him.
She justified not taking his name with gobbledygook about her career. We didn't buy it.
We were all convinced she subconsciously knew the marriage would not last.
And we were right. They divorced four years later. She remarried a year later...and took her current husband's name!
Anonymous wrote:My sister didn't change her name when she married in her early 30s. She married a nice, successful guy who seemed to check all of the boxes. On paper. But it was so obvious to all of us she never genuinely loved him.
She justified not taking his name with gobbledygook about her career. We didn't buy it.
We were all convinced she subconsciously knew the marriage would not last.
And we were right. They divorced four years later. She remarried a year later...and took her current husband's name!
don't.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What problems could it possibly cause “down the road”? I’m genuinely asking you.
I didn’t change my name, partly because I have an established professional license and publications in my maiden name, partly because I didn’t want to give up part of my identity while he kept his. Seems an unfair way to start things out. I suggested that both of us change our names (to his mom’s maiden name) and he didn’t want to do that. He also didn’t pressure me to change to his name. I might have changed it at least for personal use if his surname was an easy one, but it’s not (neither is my maiden name). Oh well.
PS - 15 years in, three kids with his surname, and no problems because of it.
No one cares about your profession maiden name, Hillary Clinton took the last name and she's as lib and professional as they get.
Anonymous wrote:It’s very provincial.
Changing your name after marriage is not a common practice world wide. In a lot of instances, a husband and wife sharing a surname signals an incestuous relationship.
However, if you’ve never travelled out of the United Stares, I can see how one could assume this practice is universal. This is no different than a villager from a remote village assuming everyone practices female genital mutilation because it’s all they know.