Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:59     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

It’s like this. People who read People get lulled into this false sense of familiarity. They identify with the celebrity. It’s vet strange.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:57     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Yes girl, and that waits you, no doubt. Bible says.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:45     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile


Look, it's obvious when he came off the trail telling everyone he was famous that he saw this as his golden parachute. This trail was his planned retirement and apparently he's been working hard at that investment since 2016. It failed, McDonald's is hiring.


And that’s why Americans have a lowering life expectancy and die alone in crappy nursing homes. No sense of empathy, solidarity, thought


The lesson is don’t engage in dangerous sports when you’re elderly, frail, and in poor health. Should be obvious.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:45     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


Will add that I think she showed her true self.


How should one look while being sued in a frivolous lawsuit?


Did you see the faces she was making? OBNOXIOUS


Don’t care. What matters is not allowing con men to lie and shake people down. Weird you have nothing to say about this grifter. Says a lot about you.


She's supposed to be a classy movie actress; he's not at her level of expectation.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:44     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


Will add that I think she showed her true self.


How should one look while being sued in a frivolous lawsuit?


Did you see the faces she was making? OBNOXIOUS


Don’t care. What matters is not allowing con men to lie and shake people down. Weird you have nothing to say about this grifter. Says a lot about you.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:40     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


I would have laughed at him too. What an idiot.


Well, then I can see why you like her. You're two of a kind.


She wishes
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:40     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile


Look, it's obvious when he came off the trail telling everyone he was famous that he saw this as his golden parachute. This trail was his planned retirement and apparently he's been working hard at that investment since 2016. It failed, McDonald's is hiring.


And that’s why Americans have a lowering life expectancy and die alone in crappy nursing homes. No sense of empathy, solidarity, thought
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:38     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


I would have laughed at him too. What an idiot.


Well, then I can see why you like her. You're two of a kind.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:33     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile


You are as ridiculous as this case
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:32     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

trail s/b trial
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:32     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile


Look, it's obvious when he came off the trail telling everyone he was famous that he saw this as his golden parachute. This trail was his planned retirement and apparently he's been working hard at that investment since 2016. It failed, McDonald's is hiring.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:32     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


He didn’t have to sue. He’s been traveling around the world and has expensive hobbies. He will be fine.

Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:31     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where does your desire to please the celebrity come from?


Weird question


Worth interrogating, don’t you think? Would GP love and die for your die in court? Detect the irony yet?
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:30     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.


Hope you eyeroll when you face bankruptcy at 76. What this tells everyone is that the new class system is here to stay and rebellion is futile
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:30     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case

Anonymous wrote:Where does your desire to please the celebrity come from?


Weird question