Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing says “white supremacy” more loudly than “every school needs a certain percentage of white children to be good.”
Not necessarily. If you have a school system runs by whites primarily for the benefit of white children, then having white kids in your school may be necessary to ensure it gets appropriate resources and attention.
There was a reason why “separate but equal” was invalidated. The NAACP didn’t challenge it because they thought White children were superior. They challenged it because they knew Black schools were inferior.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing says “white supremacy” more loudly than “every school needs a certain percentage of white children to be good.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hispanics in Fairfax County are an easy target for the DCUM-types, maybe because Hispanics here just want the opportunity to work and stay quiet because they're glad to have escaped war-torn Central America.
Now just imagine if Fairfax County's poor Hispanic population was instead replaced with the similar high-poverty African-American population from Prince George's county. Can you even fathom how it would look if the FCPS School Board was behaving in the same way as it is now, concentrating all the poor African-American families into a few poor schools, and listening to screaming rich parents who don't want to go to school with poor black children?
That already happens though?
Hardly. Hayfield, Mt. Vernon, and South County share the highest % of black students, around 25%. Totally different situation if Lewis, Justice, Annandale, Herndon, and Falls Church HS were all 50% African-American instead of Hispanic. Would the boundary-change deniers have the guts to be so publicly vocal in their repulsion to those schools? I think we'd be having very different conversations if those were the county's demographics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.
Did you see the meeting- the ball is actually rolling on this... will it get to the finish line- tbd. It sounds like they have everyone on SB to be in favor of this-although some left some wiggle room.
Does this mean that Langley boundary won’t be changed after all? For many years people on this board have been talking about how the new HS would/should change the Langley and Herndon boundaries. It looks like their hope is going down the drain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.
Did you see the meeting- the ball is actually rolling on this... will it get to the finish line- tbd. It sounds like they have everyone on SB to be in favor of this-although some left some wiggle room.
Anonymous wrote:If they build at Bull Run they will be reassigning mostly Westfield and Centreville feeders to the new school. How do you see it helping Chantilly and Oakton?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to stop playing around and expand McLean.
Did MCA press her on this issue?
To get them on the new que I mean.
The McLean HS facilities are embarrassingly outdated. All the surrounding high schools in FCPS and Arlington are new or recently overhauled and enlarged. It seems like the influence from the McLean community has waned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.
Did you see the meeting- the ball is actually rolling on this... will it get to the finish line- tbd. It sounds like they have everyone on SB to be in favor of this-although some left some wiggle room.
It will be a bloodbath. This thread is just a preview of the fun to come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.
Did you see the meeting- the ball is actually rolling on this... will it get to the finish line- tbd. It sounds like they have everyone on SB to be in favor of this-although some left some wiggle room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.
Did you see the meeting- the ball is actually rolling on this... will it get to the finish line- tbd. It sounds like they have everyone on SB to be in favor of this-although some left some wiggle room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounded like Hutchison is out for Plattenburg- said that a currently owned FCPS property has a surrounding park that gets so much community use for that area- that they would not be able to use that site.
Yep, sounds like they'll look for some vacant commercial building along Route 28 further south and probably retrofit it like Bailey's Upper in Seven Corners. I'm sure it will be great as long as it keeps Great Falls out of Herndon.
Plenty land in Great falls. The county can build a school there. Idk why we are looking in these locations where there isn’t enough property. Just doesn’t make sense.
And who is going to go to that?
The Bull Run area would make more sense than Great Falls if they actually did build a new school. I think it's a fiction. They've all but said Hutchison is DOA and trotting out the idea of retrofitting office buildings seems like a ploy to get people to object in advance.