Anonymous wrote:Khahmeini may be seriously injured:

“However, the 56-year-old may be in a coma, having lost at least one leg and is suffering serious injuries to his stomach and liver, British newspaper The Sun reports. It is unknown whether he was injured in the attack that killed his father, Ali Khamenei, or in a separate strike.

A source close to the team treating Mojtaba told The Sun he was being treated at the Sina University Hospital in Tehran and was under heavy security.

“One or two of his legs have been cut off. His liver or stomach has also ruptured. He is apparently in a coma as well,” he said in a message smuggled to a London dissident and passed to The Sun.”

Excerpt From
“Mojtaba Khamenei ‘in intensive care, seriously injured’”
The Australian
https://apple.news/ACKkTc_iLTPaiH1EkmQ8ygQ
This material may be protected by copyright.

Anonymous wrote:🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Trump says investigation into US strike on Iranian girls school is still ongoing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They still celebrating Trump?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US most definitely will. More dead, more money, more embarrassments.

You make no sense. Iran will be declawed. Their military equipment will be destroyed. Perhaps we’ll get to the nuclear material. How many more of their leaders will be killed? Meanwhile our lives will go on as if nothing is wrong. I’ll go to sporting events and out to dinners without a thought about Iran.

I thought they were already declawed. Trump said their military equipment and nuclear material/facilities were destroyed already.

Nobody believes anything Trump and Bibi are saying. Not even our allies or our own public. The government has eroded all trust

Former NATO Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis called the military campaign a 9 out of 10. He’s no Trump fan. But I’m sure you know better.

I doubt that means what you think it means. The U.S. military has performed very, very well, as it always does. That doesn't mean that our war objectives (whatever those are, who the heck knows?) can be achieved with air strikes or a few thousand Marines.

I've listened to Stavridis' analysis for years. I'm almost certain he is speaking only about the competence of the military, not the larger success of this "excursion."

Well, the Iranian propaganda repeaters in this thread will disagree with you on that. To them, it’s all controlled and formulated directly by the orange man and must be a failure. It’s impossible our armed forces have been working on and updating plans for the last 40+ years on offensive efforts against Iran - many scores and scores of options.

It’s more likely it’s all random and an abysmal failure because they want so badly for anything relating to the orange man to be a bust.

Yes yes. This is just US military playing rope a dope. This will give the Iranians a false sense of security. Those Arabs have dark skins and must be Hamas DEI hires. A good looking man like Hegseth with Jesus on his side will out smart any of those types.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US most definitely will. More dead, more money, more embarrassments.

You make no sense. Iran will be declawed. Their military equipment will be destroyed. Perhaps we’ll get to the nuclear material. How many more of their leaders will be killed? Meanwhile our lives will go on as if nothing is wrong. I’ll go to sporting events and out to dinners without a thought about Iran.

I thought they were already declawed. Trump said their military equipment and nuclear material/facilities were destroyed already.

Nobody believes anything Trump and Bibi are saying. Not even our allies or our own public. The government has eroded all trust

Former NATO Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis called the military campaign a 9 out of 10. He’s no Trump fan. But I’m sure you know better.

I doubt that means what you think it means. The U.S. military has performed very, very well, as it always does. That doesn't mean that our war objectives (whatever those are, who the heck knows?) can be achieved with air strikes or a few thousand Marines.

I've listened to Stavridis' analysis for years. I'm almost certain he is speaking only about the competence of the military, not the larger success of this "excursion."

Well, the Iranian propaganda repeaters in this thread will disagree with you on that. To them, it’s all controlled and formulated directly by the orange man and must be a failure. It’s impossible our armed forces have been working on and updating plans for the last 40+ years on offensive efforts against Iran - many scores and scores of options.

It’s more likely it’s all random and an abysmal failure because they want so badly for anything relating to the orange man to be a bust.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The US needs cannon fodder. If an enough ships join and sail in to the straits, the oil can be driven out in truck on the wrecks of all the ships.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US most definitely will. More dead, more money, more embarrassments.

You make no sense. Iran will be declawed. Their military equipment will be destroyed. Perhaps we’ll get to the nuclear material. How many more of their leaders will be killed? Meanwhile our lives will go on as if nothing is wrong. I’ll go to sporting events and out to dinners without a thought about Iran.

I thought they were already declawed. Trump said their military equipment and nuclear material/facilities were destroyed already.

Nobody believes anything Trump and Bibi are saying. Not even our allies or our own public. The government has eroded all trust

Former NATO Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis called the military campaign a 9 out of 10. He’s no Trump fan. But I’m sure you know better.

I doubt that means what you think it means. The U.S. military has performed very, very well, as it always does. That doesn't mean that our war objectives (whatever those are, who the heck knows?) can be achieved with air strikes or a few thousand Marines.

I've listened to Stavridis' analysis for years. I'm almost certain he is speaking only about the competence of the military, not the larger success of this "excursion."