Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
How about the players who pull their verbal commitments from colleges to commit somewhere else? It happens on both sides. Everyone should know that verbal offers are not set in stone.
That happens far less often on the players side and generally just when there is a coaching change. To most kids the commitment is what they have been striving for and to take it away from them is particularly cruel.
This is untrue. Often players use verbal committments at lesser schools to leverage into a committment at a better school. Again its why counting verbal commitments is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
How about the players who pull their verbal commitments from colleges to commit somewhere else? It happens on both sides. Everyone should know that verbal offers are not set in stone.
That happens far less often on the players side and generally just when there is a coaching change. To most kids the commitment is what they have been striving for and to take it away from them is particularly cruel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
How about the players who pull their verbal commitments from colleges to commit somewhere else? It happens on both sides. Everyone should know that verbal offers are not set in stone.
Which is why (on both sides) trolling insta for committment announcements is ridiculous. The only thing that should be counted is when players sign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
How about the players who pull their verbal commitments from colleges to commit somewhere else? It happens on both sides. Everyone should know that verbal offers are not set in stone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
How about the players who pull their verbal commitments from colleges to commit somewhere else? It happens on both sides. Everyone should know that verbal offers are not set in stone.
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Agree. I wish they would at least be named and outed.
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of GA or ECNL affiliation, i wish these leagues would start doing something about college coaches pulling verbal offers from their kids. There are certain coaches who are infamous for doing this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally some substantive conversation. I do think the first league that takes that focus will prevail in the long run. The other option is sort of what Gotham FC has done by enlisting a bunch of clubs from both leagues as feeders. That forces the clubs to actually focus on development in theory. Unlikely, but we can all wish right?
Gotham FC have been recruiting players as young as 2010 to train with the club. It’s an interesting way of doing things, I wonder how much pressure they put on players to miss the college step so they can sign them. If they go to college they have to go the draft route and may not get the players they want and have identified.
NWSL doesn’t have a draft.
Some of the people that post here need to get with the times. Being a know it all about womens pro soccer and not knowing that NWSL got rid of the draft gets annoying quick.
Its like they're taking whatever knowledge they've learned watching college football and basketball and applying it to Soccer. Soccer is a different world because leagues like NWSL pull players internationally. Also internationally training and development for pro players is much different than America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally some substantive conversation. I do think the first league that takes that focus will prevail in the long run. The other option is sort of what Gotham FC has done by enlisting a bunch of clubs from both leagues as feeders. That forces the clubs to actually focus on development in theory. Unlikely, but we can all wish right?
Gotham FC have been recruiting players as young as 2010 to train with the club. It’s an interesting way of doing things, I wonder how much pressure they put on players to miss the college step so they can sign them. If they go to college they have to go the draft route and may not get the players they want and have identified.
NWSL doesn’t have a draft.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally some substantive conversation. I do think the first league that takes that focus will prevail in the long run. The other option is sort of what Gotham FC has done by enlisting a bunch of clubs from both leagues as feeders. That forces the clubs to actually focus on development in theory. Unlikely, but we can all wish right?
Gotham FC have been recruiting players as young as 2010 to train with the club. It’s an interesting way of doing things, I wonder how much pressure they put on players to miss the college step so they can sign them. If they go to college they have to go the draft route and may not get the players they want and have identified.
Anonymous wrote:Finally some substantive conversation. I do think the first league that takes that focus will prevail in the long run. The other option is sort of what Gotham FC has done by enlisting a bunch of clubs from both leagues as feeders. That forces the clubs to actually focus on development in theory. Unlikely, but we can all wish right?