Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13
Lots of middle schoolers having sex
Umm .. no. Maybe down south.
Not the pp but the fact that you think it’s only “down south” and not right here is sad. It’s happening. Not a majority but I would say 10-20% by the end of 8th grade. They aren’t relationships. They are social media sexting and then hook-ups.
As a teacher and wife of a police officer in juvenile special victims, he has cases of nudes being sent in 5th grade.
Don’t turn a blind eye. It’s there and even if they aren’t doing it, they know people that are and trying to normalize it.
Snapchat is perfectly designed to conceal children sexting nudes. Know another name for it? Child pornography, and it is a felony. It happens daily in FCPS and MCPS.
Don’t give kids SnapChat. But we are getting off topic:
- responsible parents protect their children and provide teens with condoms. No questions asked.
It's crazy how kids can become life long felons now, for sexting nudes to each other. Too many laws out there, and most are completely asinine.
No.
It’s crazy how many parents do not see how toxic and destructive social media is for teens, and they just let their kids use social.
Have a spine; say NO to teen social media. It ruins lives.
- and meant to add: put a box of condoms under the sink in the kids’ bathroom.
Wait, what? You will (or so you think) forbid your teen to use social media while simultaneously tacitly encouraging them to have sex (in your home)?
No one believes making condoms available “encourages” teens to have sex.
Except you.
It does encourage sex, dummy. Just like buying them a smartphone (you know, for emergencies) encourages them to use a phone.
Most people, kids included, prefer sex without condoms.
One cannot use the internet without the computer/smartphone.
But one can have sex without the condoms.
It just boggles my mind that you genuinely think snapchat and tiktok are more harmful than piv.
What's mind-boggling is that's what you gathered from the previous comments.![]()
Poster said absolutely no social media while simultaneously stocking her kid’s bathroom with condoms. Please explain what it is you think I missed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13
Lots of middle schoolers having sex
Umm .. no. Maybe down south.
Not the pp but the fact that you think it’s only “down south” and not right here is sad. It’s happening. Not a majority but I would say 10-20% by the end of 8th grade. They aren’t relationships. They are social media sexting and then hook-ups.
As a teacher and wife of a police officer in juvenile special victims, he has cases of nudes being sent in 5th grade.
Don’t turn a blind eye. It’s there and even if they aren’t doing it, they know people that are and trying to normalize it.
Snapchat is perfectly designed to conceal children sexting nudes. Know another name for it? Child pornography, and it is a felony. It happens daily in FCPS and MCPS.
Don’t give kids SnapChat. But we are getting off topic:
- responsible parents protect their children and provide teens with condoms. No questions asked.
It's crazy how kids can become life long felons now, for sexting nudes to each other. Too many laws out there, and most are completely asinine.
No.
It’s crazy how many parents do not see how toxic and destructive social media is for teens, and they just let their kids use social.
Have a spine; say NO to teen social media. It ruins lives.
- and meant to add: put a box of condoms under the sink in the kids’ bathroom.
Wait, what? You will (or so you think) forbid your teen to use social media while simultaneously tacitly encouraging them to have sex (in your home)?
No one believes making condoms available “encourages” teens to have sex.
Except you.
It does encourage sex, dummy. Just like buying them a smartphone (you know, for emergencies) encourages them to use a phone.
Most people, kids included, prefer sex without condoms.
One cannot use the internet without the computer/smartphone.
But one can have sex without the condoms.
It just boggles my mind that you genuinely think snapchat and tiktok are more harmful than piv.
What's mind-boggling is that's what you gathered from the previous comments.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13
Lots of middle schoolers having sex
Umm .. no. Maybe down south.
Not the pp but the fact that you think it’s only “down south” and not right here is sad. It’s happening. Not a majority but I would say 10-20% by the end of 8th grade. They aren’t relationships. They are social media sexting and then hook-ups.
As a teacher and wife of a police officer in juvenile special victims, he has cases of nudes being sent in 5th grade.
Don’t turn a blind eye. It’s there and even if they aren’t doing it, they know people that are and trying to normalize it.
Snapchat is perfectly designed to conceal children sexting nudes. Know another name for it? Child pornography, and it is a felony. It happens daily in FCPS and MCPS.
Don’t give kids SnapChat. But we are getting off topic:
- responsible parents protect their children and provide teens with condoms. No questions asked.
It's crazy how kids can become life long felons now, for sexting nudes to each other. Too many laws out there, and most are completely asinine.
No.
It’s crazy how many parents do not see how toxic and destructive social media is for teens, and they just let their kids use social.
Have a spine; say NO to teen social media. It ruins lives.
- and meant to add: put a box of condoms under the sink in the kids’ bathroom.
Wait, what? You will (or so you think) forbid your teen to use social media while simultaneously tacitly encouraging them to have sex (in your home)?
No one believes making condoms available “encourages” teens to have sex.
Except you.
It does encourage sex, dummy. Just like buying them a smartphone (you know, for emergencies) encourages them to use a phone.
Most people, kids included, prefer sex without condoms.
One cannot use the internet without the computer/smartphone.
But one can have sex without the condoms.
It just boggles my mind that you genuinely think snapchat and tiktok are more harmful than piv.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our HS son has a serious gf and a job. If he and gf believe they are old enough/mature enough to have sex, then they are old enough/mature enough to buy condoms.
Cannot believe parents actually do this.
+1. I can't even believe I am reading this.
Please, I had plenty of friends IN COLLEGE who didn't have a condom at the last minute when they needed it. I want my kids to use them and I made sure they were available for their use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our HS son has a serious gf and a job. If he and gf believe they are old enough/mature enough to have sex, then they are old enough/mature enough to buy condoms.
Cannot believe parents actually do this.
+1. I can't even believe I am reading this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13
Lots of middle schoolers having sex
Umm .. no. Maybe down south.
Not the pp but the fact that you think it’s only “down south” and not right here is sad. It’s happening. Not a majority but I would say 10-20% by the end of 8th grade. They aren’t relationships. They are social media sexting and then hook-ups.
As a teacher and wife of a police officer in juvenile special victims, he has cases of nudes being sent in 5th grade.
Don’t turn a blind eye. It’s there and even if they aren’t doing it, they know people that are and trying to normalize it.
Snapchat is perfectly designed to conceal children sexting nudes. Know another name for it? Child pornography, and it is a felony. It happens daily in FCPS and MCPS.
Don’t give kids SnapChat. But we are getting off topic:
- responsible parents protect their children and provide teens with condoms. No questions asked.
It's crazy how kids can become life long felons now, for sexting nudes to each other. Too many laws out there, and most are completely asinine.
No.
It’s crazy how many parents do not see how toxic and destructive social media is for teens, and they just let their kids use social.
Have a spine; say NO to teen social media. It ruins lives.
- and meant to add: put a box of condoms under the sink in the kids’ bathroom.
Wait, what? You will (or so you think) forbid your teen to use social media while simultaneously tacitly encouraging them to have sex (in your home)?
No one believes making condoms available “encourages” teens to have sex.
Except you.
It does encourage sex, dummy. Just like buying them a smartphone (you know, for emergencies) encourages them to use a phone.
Most people, kids included, prefer sex without condoms.
One cannot use the internet without the computer/smartphone.
But one can have sex without the condoms.
Anonymous wrote:Our HS son has a serious gf and a job. If he and gf believe they are old enough/mature enough to have sex, then they are old enough/mature enough to buy condoms.
Cannot believe parents actually do this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13
Lots of middle schoolers having sex
Umm .. no. Maybe down south.
Not the pp but the fact that you think it’s only “down south” and not right here is sad. It’s happening. Not a majority but I would say 10-20% by the end of 8th grade. They aren’t relationships. They are social media sexting and then hook-ups.
As a teacher and wife of a police officer in juvenile special victims, he has cases of nudes being sent in 5th grade.
Don’t turn a blind eye. It’s there and even if they aren’t doing it, they know people that are and trying to normalize it.
Snapchat is perfectly designed to conceal children sexting nudes. Know another name for it? Child pornography, and it is a felony. It happens daily in FCPS and MCPS.
Don’t give kids SnapChat. But we are getting off topic:
- responsible parents protect their children and provide teens with condoms. No questions asked.
It's crazy how kids can become life long felons now, for sexting nudes to each other. Too many laws out there, and most are completely asinine.
No.
It’s crazy how many parents do not see how toxic and destructive social media is for teens, and they just let their kids use social.
Have a spine; say NO to teen social media. It ruins lives.
- and meant to add: put a box of condoms under the sink in the kids’ bathroom.
Wait, what? You will (or so you think) forbid your teen to use social media while simultaneously tacitly encouraging them to have sex (in your home)?
Anonymous wrote:When I was 16 I secretly went on the pill at public health. My boyfriend’s dad also casually put a massive Costco type pack of Trojans in my bfs dresser. He was not home much and remembered being a teenager. I appreciated he was looking out for us.
My mom may have known I was in pill (and maybe signed paperwork-can’t remember), but I initiated it. I was a bit of a delinquent when younger and had been in residential treatment for a bit and they offer turbo charged sex Ed so i was not about to go without multiple forms of bc. Thank goodness for public health clinics! I used free clinics a bunch in teens and early 20s and thankfully had no “accidents”. I would have absolutely felt secure in seeking out plan b if needed. It wasn’t around then (90s), I’m glad it is now.
To answer your question, I’d say 13/14 jic and earlier/later if they ask. I’d also check expiration dates. I have a girl and we’ll probably fine tune that once she hits puberty. I hope she always feels safe talking with me about anything, including her sexual health/sexuality - questions concerns kind of stuff.