Sounds like a number of area swimmers and lacrosse players I know. Their lives and that of their parents revolve around such activities since pre-K!
pp at 6:59 didn't say she was unhappy with her 5th-grader's peer group; rather commented on what her kid had said. I recall from grade school myself we all knew who the smartest kids were. You listen to them answer questions in class, partner with them on projects, examples of their writing is posted n the walls etc.
Anonymous wrote:That's odd. I'm very happy with my 5th-grader's peer group in the Center. I know most of her friends, and they all seem bright, and, perhaps more importantly, they're extremely creative, outside-the-box thinkers. Some of the stuff they come up with is really interesting and clever, and a lot of it isn't classwork, it's just stuff they are allowed to do in their "free time" in class but they get really involved and intensely focused on things. Last year my DD and 3 of her friends made and illustrated a whole set of little books for fun - they naturally divided up the project based on their talents - 2 were the illustrators and 2 did the writing & dialogue, and they spent a LOT of time typing up the text, editing & revising it, adapting the drawings when the text changed, etc. They used a publishing software they had at school to lay it out in book format. All because they thought it was fun to do together. I've seen lots of examples of this kind of thing in our Center.
Anonymous wrote:My fifth grader tells me at least half the kids in his AAP Center class must have peaked in the 2nd grade, because they don't seem all that swift to him. (And the other half definitely belongs he says, and he isn't among the smartest ones).
So I think it is very possible the precocious 2nd grader with high CogAts may have been advanced at that point in time, or extensively coached, but other kids may catch up with them in later grades.
Anonymous wrote:There is a huge correlation between working way above grade level (e.g., a K student starting school reading at a 3rd grade + level or doing upper-level math) and intellectual giftedness.
Anonymous wrote:There is a huge correlation between working way above grade level (e.g., a K student starting school reading at a 3rd grade + level or doing upper-level math) and intellectual giftedness.
Anonymous wrote:
FCPS is a really big district. Just because one school or even one teacher does, does not mean they all do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the teachers don't usually differentiate instruction at all for children in grades K-2? Sounds like a lot of really bored kids.
Yes, they do.
Anonymous wrote:So the teachers don't usually differentiate instruction at all for children in grades K-2? Sounds like a lot of really bored kids.