Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Northam thing is really unfortunate and he should resign. But this doesn’t make the GOP saints, FFS. Between King, embrace of the Conferacy, and the POTUS and kid kids retweeting white nationalist sh*t, the GOP is the party of hate and Proud Boys.
LOL!
The Democrats had a KKK Grand Wizard as a member of Congress, whom they held in high regard, for half a century.
Gosh, that was like 35 years ago. I’m talking about TODAY. Wake up.
Gosh, Robert E Lee was over 100 years ago...
No one is proposing we build statues of Byrd or Northam here.
Actually, a statue causes far less harm than a governorship.
Symbolically or practically?
I don't actually know what Northam has or has not done as governor. Has it been terrible?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Better for AAs to vote for Republicans who explicitly plan to disenfranchise them. Right?
Better for AAs to vote for Dems. As their political power continues to fade against Hispanics, Asians, and Muslims, they can take the Dems with them.
The Dems are fading? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a power struggle between Obama and Clinton, plain and simple. Obama's guy is the Lt Gov and Clinton/McAwful's guy is Northam.
No, its a struggle between right and wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Better for AAs to vote for Republicans who explicitly plan to disenfranchise them. Right?
Better for AAs to vote for Dems. As their political power continues to fade against Hispanics, Asians, and Muslims, they can take the Dems with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Better for AAs to vote for Republicans who explicitly plan to disenfranchise them. Right?
Anonymous wrote:Curious to see if CNN or MSNBC covers this. I don't watch either, so report back if they do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Better for AAs to vote for Republicans who explicitly plan to disenfranchise them. Right?
Better for EVERYONE to not vote for any candidate, Democrat or Republican, who explicitly plans to disenfranchise them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Better for AAs to vote for Republicans who explicitly plan to disenfranchise them. Right?
Anonymous wrote:This is a power struggle between Obama and Clinton, plain and simple. Obama's guy is the Lt Gov and Clinton/McAwful's guy is Northam.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GOP had David Duke who was an actual KKK Grand Wizard as a representative plus current rep Steve King who is a proud white nationalist NOW. A yearbook picture is small potatoes. If someone tells me there's evidence from the last 20 years that Northam is a racist, I will agree he should resign, but not over a picture from decades ago.
+1 Northam should resign when Steve King does (and Steve King has no intention of resigning because he is truly shameless.)
+1 The GOP hasn't even censured Steve King for saying racist stuff last week.
So you don't believe Northam is a racist?
Racism is impact. Intent comes second. Doesn’t matter what Northam was thinking. What he did was racist.
And what Steve King (last week) did is racist. but no one is talking about him resigning. Why are standards so much higher for Democrats? We keep falling on our sword to maintain moral purity, while the GOP is going the opposite direction and still has most of the power in our 3 branches of government.
Democrats whine about trump being racist all the time because he is anti illegal immigration and they whine that he questioned Obamas place of birth yet the majority vote for pc motives based on gender and race and now they support someone who is a racist because he is a dem. If that's not racist or prejudice I don't know what is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Blue wave has egg on its black face.
Whereas the red wave simply shrugs it's shoulders and says, give me my hood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin
Not racism but patronizing. If the Dems didn’t pander to their African American constituents, they could win few races in blue states.
Anonymous wrote:History has shown time and time again that the party of racism runs deep on the left side of the ledger... just sayin