Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

I agree excuses are bad news. How many top Loudoun players do you think will reject ECNL and leave this year?

I'd stay quiet Arlington dad. Your U15 team has won 5 games, none against winning teams. And your U14 team has only beaten two teams with a .500 to winning record. Across two age groups that is not exactly "just behind" FCV.

Start beating some quality opponents before you start beating your chest about your superiority.

Again, I'm not an Arlington parent, and if someone said they were "just behind" FCV it definitely wasn't me. The results show that at these age groups FCV and WS-MD are very competitive, Arlington is holding it's own, and WS-VA is not very competitive. It would not be accurate to say that Arlington is just behind FCV. Given their location, size of their player pool, and access to fields, they have the potential to catch up at some point, but right now I would say that Arlington is still far behind FCV, but that WS-VA is far behind Arlington.

The lingering uncertainty over whether or not they are even going to have a program at all next year is not going to help them bridge that gap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

I agree excuses are bad news. How many top Loudoun players do you think will reject ECNL and leave this year?

I'd stay quiet Arlington dad. Your U15 team has won 5 games, none against winning teams. And your U14 team has only beaten two teams with a .500 to winning record. Across two age groups that is not exactly "just behind" FCV.

Start beating some quality opponents before you start beating your chest about your superiority.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How many Loudoun Red players do you see moving to FCV for next year?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

Here we go again. WS VA has an 07 who has played in U14 and U15 games this past season. While it may not be the best for their w/l ratio, it may be the correct decision for her development. How did Arlington girls DA do in U16 and above? NO WINS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT COMPETE. Spirit VA has a bunch of really talented players from 08 thru 01 in their VA DA.

Spirit could do a better job recruiting for their VA program. Hopefully they will after they announce that they will be maintaining the VA program in a few weeks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

I agree excuses are bad news. How many top Loudoun players do you think will reject ECNL and leave this year?

Anonymous wrote:Brute force is PWSI style.

Loudoun had success through numbers. Kids are taught team soccer very early on. They always beat teams that were more free flowing in their play.

At U15, Loudoun kids left for FCV and McLean. Loudoun kids will continue going to FCV for DA. However, they wont go to McLean anymore.

McLean will suffer because of this as they lose their Loudoun pipeline as well as Mclean kids going to Arlington for DA. That's why a Mclean-Spirit partnership makes sense.

It removes a ECNL program from the area and strengthens a DA program.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Not an Arlington parent.

2 wins out of 23 games is struggling.

If it's because they've mismanaged their rosters, that's on them, but making excuses is not the way to attract and retain top talent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Hey Arlington human..relax..the difference between the last WS vs Arlington game was 1...breath and step down from your superiority.

When Arlington plays their whole roster equally or rosters more then 14 maybe your point will stand.

Anonymous wrote:Brute force is PWSI style.

Loudoun had success through numbers. Kids are taught team soccer very early on. They always beat teams that were more free flowing in their play.

At U15, Loudoun kids left for FCV and McLean. Loudoun kids will continue going to FCV for DA. However, they wont go to McLean anymore.

McLean will suffer because of this as they lose their Loudoun pipeline as well as Mclean kids going to Arlington for DA. That's why a Mclean-Spirit partnership makes sense.

It removes a ECNL program from the area and strengthens a DA program.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Combined results of U14/U15 age groups in the fall (W-D-L):

FCV: 19-4-3
WS-MD: 16-3-2
ARL: 13-4-13
WS-VA: 2-4-17

Call it what you want - years, levels, whatever. They are definitely behind.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WS is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a few years behind Arlington...and please please please...stop putting Arlington next to FCV. They are not even is the same room let alone conversation. The only thing they have in common is the state they reside in.

^^^ This WS and ARL basher (FCV parent) always has to have the last word on these boards. Always talking doomsday with regard to other DA clubs. So funny.

Not bashing anyone. WS and Arligton are comparable. Arlington and FCV are not. The argument that WS is a few years behind Arlington and FCV is not true. A few years behind FCV..yes. A few years behind Arlington..no. That's what I'm saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spirit needs to merge with McLean and its game over.

3 distinct areas in Nova. FCV (west), Spirit (mid), Arlington (east).

VDA and BRYC would remain strong ECNL options while Loudoun ECNL would suffer because of the squeeze.

Not a Loudoun parent, but I think you are discounting them too much. To me, they have always seemed to have the best youth program in VA up through the U12s. Once those teams reached the U13 age group, they were historically picked clean by the ECNL and DA options in the area. However, now that they have ECNL, I would be very surprised if they do not become the top ECNL/DA program in NoVa as the 07, 08, 09, etc. age groups continue to age up and go through ECNL.

Granted, time will tell, and I could definitely be wrong on this. But if I had to make a bet on whether Loudoun will be top dog in NoVa in 5 years among all the ECNL/DA teams, then I'd bet on Loudoun.

The only real problem with Loudoun is their style of play is more conducive to success at younger ages than it is able to maintain success in higher levels of play at the older ages like ECNL. If Loudoun can be more patient with a club wide consistent possession style then I agree with you. They always have a large and talented pool of players but they tend to take the easy wins at younger ages through brute force.