The royal threads have become very tiresome with that one insult slinging, chart posting, kate hating poster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I was going to be forced to send my 8 year old children away to be raised by strangers, you would most certainly see me prioritizing time with them over the "work" of ribbon cuttings and cookbooks.

Can you imagine sending your 2nd grader off to boarding school and required summer overseas immersions, never to tuck them in at night or be there to hear what happened in school that day?

Kate and Will need to soak up every moment they have with those three, before handing them off to strangers.

I also wonder how Meghan will end up handling that.

Sending your kid off to boarding school is very un American. I would think this would be the most difficult thing to agree to for an American marrying into the royal family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate have had fine lines to walk -- not to outshadow Prince Charles as the future king and Camilla as Queen Consort. There were so many rumors/rumblings early on that Charles should be skipped over for William.

William and Kate have 50 years of engagements ahead of them, assuming they have the longevity of their ancestors.

They have plenty of time. Kate is focusing on her young children while they are still at home with her -- she is not in a race.

Diana hit her prime after her children left the nest.

Diana died when Harry was 12 and William was 15. She was younger than William and Kate are now. So I'm not sure you have any idea about royal life at all.

PP is correct. Diana really started doing things after her boys went to boarding school.

A - That isn’t leaving the nest. B - Diana had 300 documented engagements the year she gave birth to Harry. So you’re both wrong. Idiots.

What a class act you are! Please link to said 300 events. Kate is not equal to Diana as a reference point -- Camilla is. Camilla is married to the Prince of Wales.

Boarding school can be considered leaving the nest.

I'm not sure sure where you're going with that. You do realize that Diana was Prince William's mother right? As such she was also married to the Prince Of Wales? But if you really want Camilla's numbers, she's outpaced Kate in engagements 3-to-1. No I'm not going to link it for you, look it up.

But here is the lovely article on how much Wills & Kate have been slammed for slacking off including how hard Diana worked with newborns and toddlers:

Kate and William are slammed for doing HALF the official engagements Charles and Diana did at the same age
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4077950/Kate-William-slammed-doing-HALF-official-engagements-Charles-Diana-did-age.html

Also do you feel like more of an idiot now or is this just your everyday mindset?

To spell this out for you --- you should be comparing numbers of engagements of Camilla and Diana, as both were/are married to the Prince of Wales, as next to be King. Kate is not in the same position at this point as Diana was. Kate is not next in line to be queen. Why do you keep comparing Kate with Diana? Again, WTH, I know that Diana was William's mother.

Got it. Don’t compare Kate to anyone because she’s too slow to match her dead mother-in-law, pregnant sister-in-law, or current stepmother-in-law.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I was going to be forced to send my 8 year old children away to be raised by strangers, you would most certainly see me prioritizing time with them over the "work" of ribbon cuttings and cookbooks.

Can you imagine sending your 2nd grader off to boarding school and required summer overseas immersions, never to tuck them in at night or be there to hear what happened in school that day?

Kate and Will need to soak up every moment they have with those three, before handing them off to strangers.

Look here they are. The delusional “minivan majority” who think Kate is their mom friend.

Yawn. Always the personal attack when you can’t think of anything else to say. Stay classy!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I was going to be forced to send my 8 year old children away to be raised by strangers, you would most certainly see me prioritizing time with them over the "work" of ribbon cuttings and cookbooks.

Can you imagine sending your 2nd grader off to boarding school and required summer overseas immersions, never to tuck them in at night or be there to hear what happened in school that day?

Kate and Will need to soak up every moment they have with those three, before handing them off to strangers.

Look here they are. The delusional “minivan majority” who think Kate is their mom friend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t hate Kate. I just want her to work. She needs to show us how much she values being a royal

That’s your opinion not a fact. Learn the difference. I think that taking care of three kids under 5 is a hell of a lot of work.

No one cares what the first PP thinks. Kate is spending time being a parent. That’s her decision and most people think it’s a good one.

You have no idea what most people think about Kate.

You are beating a dead horse here. Kate is doing just fine and you can't stand it. It eats you up that you're hero Meghan will always be a distant second.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t hate Kate. I just want her to work. She needs to show us how much she values being a royal

That’s your opinion not a fact. Learn the difference. I think that taking care of three kids under 5 is a hell of a lot of work.

No one cares what the first PP thinks. Kate is spending time being a parent. That’s her decision and most people think it’s a good one.

You have no idea what most people think about Kate.

Anonymous wrote:If I was going to be forced to send my 8 year old children away to be raised by strangers, you would most certainly see me prioritizing time with them over the "work" of ribbon cuttings and cookbooks.

Can you imagine sending your 2nd grader off to boarding school and required summer overseas immersions, never to tuck them in at night or be there to hear what happened in school that day?

Kate and Will need to soak up every moment they have with those three, before handing them off to strangers.

If I was going to be forced to send my 8 year old children away to be raised by strangers, you would most certainly see me prioritizing time with them over the "work" of ribbon cuttings and cookbooks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t hate Kate. I just want her to work. She needs to show us how much she values being a royal

That’s your opinion not a fact. Learn the difference. I think that taking care of three kids under 5 is a hell of a lot of work.

No one cares what the first PP thinks. Kate is spending time being a parent. That’s her decision and most people think it’s a good one.

+1 Just because some random American wants to see Kate "work" more doesn't mean anything. The often cited popularity poll puts Kate and William higher above the "harder" working Anne and Charles, so maybe there is an inverse relationship to working and popularity. And the so called article "slamming' Will & Kate was just another opinion.... it doesn't say who is even doing the slamming. It's about as believable and relevant as Meghan supposedly making Kate cry or a temper tantrum over a tiara. Tabloids are either true or not and seems like people want to pick and choose which to believe and only want to believe the one that puts there preferred Duchess in a better light.

Will and Kate's kids will never grow up wishing their parents "worked" harder, as parents their primary job and obligation is to raising their children well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t hate Kate. I just want her to work. She needs to show us how much she values being a royal

That’s your opinion not a fact. Learn the difference. I think that taking care of three kids under 5 is a hell of a lot of work.

No one cares what the first PP thinks. Kate is spending time being a parent. That’s her decision and most people think it’s a good one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate have had fine lines to walk -- not to outshadow Prince Charles as the future king and Camilla as Queen Consort. There were so many rumors/rumblings early on that Charles should be skipped over for William.

William and Kate have 50 years of engagements ahead of them, assuming they have the longevity of their ancestors.

They have plenty of time. Kate is focusing on her young children while they are still at home with her -- she is not in a race.

Diana hit her prime after her children left the nest.

Diana died when Harry was 12 and William was 15. She was younger than William and Kate are now. So I'm not sure you have any idea about royal life at all.

PP is correct. Diana really started doing things after her boys went to boarding school.

A - That isn’t leaving the nest. B - Diana had 300 documented engagements the year she gave birth to Harry. So you’re both wrong. Idiots.

What a class act you are! Please link to said 300 events. Kate is not equal to Diana as a reference point -- Camilla is. Camilla is married to the Prince of Wales.

Boarding school can be considered leaving the nest.

I'm not sure sure where you're going with that. You do realize that Diana was Prince William's mother right? As such she was also married to the Prince Of Wales? But if you really want Camilla's numbers, she's outpaced Kate in engagements 3-to-1. No I'm not going to link it for you, look it up.

But here is the lovely article on how much Wills & Kate have been slammed for slacking off including how hard Diana worked with newborns and toddlers:

Kate and William are slammed for doing HALF the official engagements Charles and Diana did at the same age
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4077950/Kate-William-slammed-doing-HALF-official-engagements-Charles-Diana-did-age.html

Also do you feel like more of an idiot now or is this just your everyday mindset?

To spell this out for you --- you should be comparing numbers of engagements of Camilla and Diana, as both were/are married to the Prince of Wales, as next to be King. Kate is not in the same position at this point as Diana was. Kate is not next in line to be queen. Why do you keep comparing Kate with Diana? Again, WTH, I know that Diana was William's mother.

And to clarify -- please don't start to compare Kate with Camilla. Again, Camilla is next in line to be Queen Consort. Kate will move into role as married to Prince of Wales once Charles is King.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate have had fine lines to walk -- not to outshadow Prince Charles as the future king and Camilla as Queen Consort. There were so many rumors/rumblings early on that Charles should be skipped over for William.

William and Kate have 50 years of engagements ahead of them, assuming they have the longevity of their ancestors.

They have plenty of time. Kate is focusing on her young children while they are still at home with her -- she is not in a race.

Diana hit her prime after her children left the nest.

Diana died when Harry was 12 and William was 15. She was younger than William and Kate are now. So I'm not sure you have any idea about royal life at all.

PP is correct. Diana really started doing things after her boys went to boarding school.

A - That isn’t leaving the nest. B - Diana had 300 documented engagements the year she gave birth to Harry. So you’re both wrong. Idiots.

What a class act you are! Please link to said 300 events. Kate is not equal to Diana as a reference point -- Camilla is. Camilla is married to the Prince of Wales.

Boarding school can be considered leaving the nest.

I'm not sure sure where you're going with that. You do realize that Diana was Prince William's mother right? As such she was also married to the Prince Of Wales? But if you really want Camilla's numbers, she's outpaced Kate in engagements 3-to-1. No I'm not going to link it for you, look it up.

But here is the lovely article on how much Wills & Kate have been slammed for slacking off including how hard Diana worked with newborns and toddlers:

Kate and William are slammed for doing HALF the official engagements Charles and Diana did at the same age
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4077950/Kate-William-slammed-doing-HALF-official-engagements-Charles-Diana-did-age.html

Also do you feel like more of an idiot now or is this just your everyday mindset?

To spell this out for you --- you should be comparing numbers of engagements of Camilla and Diana, as both were/are married to the Prince of Wales, as next to be King. Kate is not in the same position at this point as Diana was. Kate is not next in line to be queen. Why do you keep comparing Kate with Diana? Again, WTH, I know that Diana was William's mother.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate have had fine lines to walk -- not to outshadow Prince Charles as the future king and Camilla as Queen Consort. There were so many rumors/rumblings early on that Charles should be skipped over for William.

William and Kate have 50 years of engagements ahead of them, assuming they have the longevity of their ancestors.

They have plenty of time. Kate is focusing on her young children while they are still at home with her -- she is not in a race.

Diana hit her prime after her children left the nest.

Diana died when Harry was 12 and William was 15. She was younger than William and Kate are now. So I'm not sure you have any idea about royal life at all.

PP is correct. Diana really started doing things after her boys went to boarding school.

A - That isn’t leaving the nest. B - Diana had 300 documented engagements the year she gave birth to Harry. So you’re both wrong. Idiots.

What a class act you are! Please link to said 300 events. Kate is not equal to Diana as a reference point -- Camilla is. Camilla is married to the Prince of Wales.

Boarding school can be considered leaving the nest.

show us the receipts!

Kate appears to be working the same amount as any other royal. Kate hater is just frothing for some reason

Try reading. Answer ‘receipts’ are above.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate have had fine lines to walk -- not to outshadow Prince Charles as the future king and Camilla as Queen Consort. There were so many rumors/rumblings early on that Charles should be skipped over for William.

William and Kate have 50 years of engagements ahead of them, assuming they have the longevity of their ancestors.

They have plenty of time. Kate is focusing on her young children while they are still at home with her -- she is not in a race.

Diana hit her prime after her children left the nest.

Diana died when Harry was 12 and William was 15. She was younger than William and Kate are now. So I'm not sure you have any idea about royal life at all.

PP is correct. Diana really started doing things after her boys went to boarding school.

A - That isn’t leaving the nest. B - Diana had 300 documented engagements the year she gave birth to Harry. So you’re both wrong. Idiots.

What a class act you are! Please link to said 300 events. Kate is not equal to Diana as a reference point -- Camilla is. Camilla is married to the Prince of Wales.

Boarding school can be considered leaving the nest.

show us the receipts!

Kate appears to be working the same amount as any other royal. Kate hater is just frothing for some reason