Anonymous
Post 10/28/2017 10:33     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

I think that naming a school for Johns or Marshall(except for the George C. Marshall issue) would have been fine EXCEPT it would appear at sticking a finger in the eye of the "keepers". And, that is what we needed to avoid in this case. I think that the SB members were subtly trying to do that with "Justice"--but, I think Mendez would have been a great choice. The "changers" really wanted an African American--that is clear, or the SB would have voted overwhelmingly for Mendez. His story was truly inspirational and that, coupled with the connection to Stuart, would have been a great selection.

However, that would not have satisfied Evans, Hynes, Keys-Gamarra, et.al. who were determined to have a civil rights connection.

Justice is the closest they could get to their wish. Nobody wins. Everyone loses. Who really likes the name?

FCPS has been naming schools after persons of color. There is no high school--but no high school has been named after a person in a very, very long time. I'm guessing that Robinson was the last time.

Anonymous
Post 10/28/2017 10:23     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why didn't they want Peace Valley?


Listening to the discussion (which hardly mentioned PV at all), it seemed like the energy was to advocate for identity honors.... a black man, a black woman, a hispanic man. The "gotta get my group recognized" seemed to be carrying the day. We are NOT a post-racial county. Clearly. If people could be objective, they would go for something neutral like Peace Valley. But, people can't be objective b/c they are trying to win one for ______ team.


We were never in a post-racial county or country. The only people who believed that were whites willing to overlook bigotry. The SB didn't pick the name of an individual. Justice seems neutral to me--much more neutral than Stuart.
Anonymous
Post 10/28/2017 10:14     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't they want Peace Valley?


Listening to the discussion (which hardly mentioned PV at all), it seemed like the energy was to advocate for identity honors.... a black man, a black woman, a hispanic man. The "gotta get my group recognized" seemed to be carrying the day. We are NOT a post-racial county. Clearly. If people could be objective, they would go for something neutral like Peace Valley. But, people can't be objective b/c they are trying to win one for ______ team.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 22:41     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Why didn't they want Peace Valley?
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 21:52     Subject: New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:The public voted for stuart


Most votes were not for Stuart - tells you something when the majority want a new name.

Go take a poll at Lake Braddock and see if 80% of the total votes are for something else.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 21:13     Subject: New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

The public voted for stuart
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 20:43     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:
Would Schultz have still supported Mendez if she'd had enough votes for her motion to pass? Just asking. She's quite good at working the system to make it seem like she's advocating for things she knows won't happen.


Yes, she would have. Did you listen to her speech? McLaughlin was the one who wanted to pursue it, but had to leave town. Schultz met with the family (I don't know if it was in person or on the phone.)

This is the problem: you don't think that people who disagree with you can also have good ideas. I don't think she advocates for things she does not wish to pass. She advocates and always gets shut down.

All along, she has supported the process on this issue. Her foes kept changing the process. Had this been done properly, there would have been less divisiveness.
The people who spoke to the process issue were speaking truth to power. In this case, the SB kept changing the process to get the desired results. At every step, it did not work.

What they should have done was come forward initially and said that they needed to change the name. Then, moved forward with the name change. Instead, they went to the community to get the power to change the name--and the community rejected it. So, they voted that it was necessary to change it. The whole process was a lie. Anyone who has watched it knows this.
People might not have liked changing the name, but had they been honest with their intentions from the start, the pain would have been over long ago. Instead, they tried to pretend that it was up to the community. It was never up to the community.



Don't worry, the lawsuit will take care of this. They can lose in court and then do the process you just mentioned of just saying they are renaming. Then everyone should be happy.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 19:00     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Would Schultz have still supported Mendez if she'd had enough votes for her motion to pass? Just asking. She's quite good at working the system to make it seem like she's advocating for things she knows won't happen.


Yes, she would have. Did you listen to her speech? McLaughlin was the one who wanted to pursue it, but had to leave town. Schultz met with the family (I don't know if it was in person or on the phone.)

This is the problem: you don't think that people who disagree with you can also have good ideas. I don't think she advocates for things she does not wish to pass. She advocates and always gets shut down.

All along, she has supported the process on this issue. Her foes kept changing the process. Had this been done properly, there would have been less divisiveness.
The people who spoke to the process issue were speaking truth to power. In this case, the SB kept changing the process to get the desired results. At every step, it did not work.

What they should have done was come forward initially and said that they needed to change the name. Then, moved forward with the name change. Instead, they went to the community to get the power to change the name--and the community rejected it. So, they voted that it was necessary to change it. The whole process was a lie. Anyone who has watched it knows this.
People might not have liked changing the name, but had they been honest with their intentions from the start, the pain would have been over long ago. Instead, they tried to pretend that it was up to the community. It was never up to the community.

Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 18:18     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:
I agree we couldn't have two Marshall HS close to one another, but when you come up with a list of specious reasons to discount various names, such as Johns and Mendez, it really does come across as if you're just looking for an excuse to preserve a status quo that, in too many instances, honors white men who fought for a despicable cause.


If you don't think the issue with the Barbara Johns name was a problem, then you really do not know teenagers very well.

And, what were the specious complaints against Mendez? I thought that was a great choice. A member of the community who led a remarkable life of service. I was shocked when the far left of our SB all turned him down.
Was it because it was not their idea or was it because it had to reflect an African American Civil Rights leader?

I think that Evans was under pressure to come up with something for the African Americans--not all people of color. Had there not been another Marshall, Thurgood Marshall would have been a terrific choice, but the people who wanted TG never admitted that two Marshall High Schools would be a problem.

And, there people, you have "identity politics."

The obvious answer was staring them in the face. It was a name that could have brought all sorts of learning experiences and joy to the kids. Sad that our SB members are so short-sighted. Maybe it was because it was a motion made by Schultz.



Would Schultz have still supported Mendez if she'd had enough votes for her motion to pass? Just asking. She's quite good at working the system to make it seem like she's advocating for things she knows won't happen.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 18:09     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's about time Sheriff Buford T. Justice received this justly-due recognition.


I hope Bandit is the name of the next high school built.




NO! Bandits needs to be the mascot of Justice:

Justice Bandits

The mascot can dress like Burt Reynolds--cowboy hat, plaid shirt. Wow! What fun.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 17:57     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

I agree we couldn't have two Marshall HS close to one another, but when you come up with a list of specious reasons to discount various names, such as Johns and Mendez, it really does come across as if you're just looking for an excuse to preserve a status quo that, in too many instances, honors white men who fought for a despicable cause.


If you don't think the issue with the Barbara Johns name was a problem, then you really do not know teenagers very well.

And, what were the specious complaints against Mendez? I thought that was a great choice. A member of the community who led a remarkable life of service. I was shocked when the far left of our SB all turned him down.
Was it because it was not their idea or was it because it had to reflect an African American Civil Rights leader?

I think that Evans was under pressure to come up with something for the African Americans--not all people of color. Had there not been another Marshall, Thurgood Marshall would have been a terrific choice, but the people who wanted TG never admitted that two Marshall High Schools would be a problem.

And, there people, you have "identity politics."

The obvious answer was staring them in the face. It was a name that could have brought all sorts of learning experiences and joy to the kids. Sad that our SB members are so short-sighted. Maybe it was because it was a motion made by Schultz.

Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 17:20     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:It's about time Sheriff Buford T. Justice received this justly-due recognition.


I hope Bandit is the name of the next high school built.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 17:07     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:
I still don't know why no one pushed for Peace Valley other than a strong desire to keep pursuing identity politics with school names.



And, that is the really sad thing about this whole process.

1. Most students could not have cared less who the school was named after. They just did not want to change the name.
2. Sadly, while changing the name might be the "right" thing to do, it is not going to make a difference in the education of those students. It may make some of them feel better, but it really won't change things.
3. It has encouraged racism to raise its ugly head and encouraged divisiveness.
4. When we name institutions BECAUSE of their color, it leads to some ridiculous choices. When Mr. Moon said he'd love to see a school named after an Asian American, that's fine, but it does not mean anything. It's only a name.
5. Names should always be brainstormed and tested before presented as the selection: for example, we already have a Marshall High; Barbara Johns High has some unfortunate connotations; Mendez was a last minute consideration; Justice High is the name of some juvenile facilities; a chain of stores; Just-ICE (which is really too bad considering the demographics of this school).

They spent all that time on deciding whether to change the name and, yet, could not come up with a decent name.

The process was ridiculous. Way too many suggestions. Good grief, even the primaries have run-offs when there is not a 50% winner. But, Marshall should never have been in the mix.


For whatever reason, it was really important for a lot of people to argue that everyone had been happy at the school for decades and that only discussing a name change led to racism or divisiveness. I'm not sure why they didn't read the documents submitted by the working group committees or talk to more families. It was very clear to anyone who made that effort that many people had been unhappy with this Confederate name for a long time. Not a majority, of course, but do you really make decisions about appropriate educational environments without considering the impact on minority students?

I agree we couldn't have two Marshall HS close to one another, but when you come up with a list of specious reasons to discount various names, such as Johns and Mendez, it really does come across as if you're just looking for an excuse to preserve a status quo that, in too many instances, honors white men who fought for a despicable cause.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 16:45     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

I still don't know why no one pushed for Peace Valley other than a strong desire to keep pursuing identity politics with school names.



And, that is the really sad thing about this whole process.

1. Most students could not have cared less who the school was named after. They just did not want to change the name.
2. Sadly, while changing the name might be the "right" thing to do, it is not going to make a difference in the education of those students. It may make some of them feel better, but it really won't change things.
3. It has encouraged racism to raise its ugly head and encouraged divisiveness.
4. When we name institutions BECAUSE of their color, it leads to some ridiculous choices. When Mr. Moon said he'd love to see a school named after an Asian American, that's fine, but it does not mean anything. It's only a name.
5. Names should always be brainstormed and tested before presented as the selection: for example, we already have a Marshall High; Barbara Johns High has some unfortunate connotations; Mendez was a last minute consideration; Justice High is the name of some juvenile facilities; a chain of stores; Just-ICE (which is really too bad considering the demographics of this school).

They spent all that time on deciding whether to change the name and, yet, could not come up with a decent name.

The process was ridiculous. Way too many suggestions. Good grief, even the primaries have run-offs when there is not a 50% winner. But, Marshall should never have been in the mix.
Anonymous
Post 10/27/2017 14:57     Subject: Re:New Name for JEB Stuart HS - 9/16 Community Vote

Anonymous wrote:Karen Keys-Gamarra tried on the fly last night to make it explicit that Justice was only shorthand for Justice Thurgood Marshall, and got shot down. Not an auspicious start and she seriously pissed off people who'd been told it would also honor Johns and Mendez. It also looked like she was relying on the student rep throughout the night to explain things to her.


Agree that she was not prepared and did not handle things well as the process evolved. She should have made a separate motion for Jus. Thurg. Marshall rather than changing Schultz's motion. And really, she shouldn't have made the motion for Jus. Thurg. Marshall at all b/c she seemed to be doing it only to appease people who were arguing for an actual person's name rather than a concept name. Dumb move. Have your own positions and follow through with them.

IMO, the process was flawed from the get-go. They started with FAR, FAR too many names -- including ones they should have known could NOT be used (i.e. Justice Thurgood Marshall). The Board should have provided fewer options, but GOOD options from the start. Then taken the vote -- no write ins. Just "pick from these 6-8 names that we have come up with".

I still don't know why no one pushed for Peace Valley other than a strong desire to keep pursuing identity politics with school names.