Anonymous wrote:A pedophile freak would not have left a ransom note with the body in the basement.
Patsy screwed up when she wrote that note.
Anonymous wrote:doodlebug wrote:Patsy's handwriting was also shown to be unlikely to be a match. John was 5 (meaning no match) and Pasty's was 4-4.5. I really think it was someone who knew john through work or knew the family intimately enough to get around the house, know money details etc. People talk, it's totally possible Patsy mentioned something at one point. Who knows.
I think it was definitely someone familiar with the family. But this person also had to be a pedophile. The way in which she was killed was not just a regular murder, it was very likely sexual motivated. I think a handyman, family friend, the Santa that John mentioned or other another sicko that had been around the house could've done it. I also think her pageantry experience opened the door for a pedophile to become obsessed with her as well. In fact one guy that in lived in a halfway house (or something like it) down the street admitted he was obsessed with JB. He had a picture of her in his pocket when he was arrested years later for child porn on his computer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly respected outside homicide detective felt strongly that it could be an intruder. Explains a lot about the lack of prints in the snow....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEM3l4WOcZE
Just watched this. Always felt it was someone in the family but this detective's intruder theory is very compelling. Particularly the point about the stun gun and the sexual nature of the murder. After seeing the crime scene photos in this documentary, it doesn't look like this murder was staged after the fact. I now have a whole new view.
Meh, the stun gun has been disproven.
Link?
The first lead investigator who write that book did not do his job. He was fixated on the Ramseys and dismissed any other theory. His book was trash.
The book written by the lead investigaor on the case--foreign factions. he addresses the Dna evidence as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Patsy was batshit insane on top of mixing booze and benzos, a combo I've witnessed firsthand turn an individual into a frothing rage monster.
Agreed.
What are benzos??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Patsy was batshit insane on top of mixing booze and benzos, a combo I've witnessed firsthand turn an individual into a frothing rage monster.
Agreed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly respected outside homicide detective felt strongly that it could be an intruder. Explains a lot about the lack of prints in the snow....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEM3l4WOcZE
Just watched this. Always felt it was someone in the family but this detective's intruder theory is very compelling. Particularly the point about the stun gun and the sexual nature of the murder. After seeing the crime scene photos in this documentary, it doesn't look like this murder was staged after the fact. I now have a whole new view.
Meh, the stun gun has been disproven.
Link?
doodlebug wrote:Patsy's handwriting was also shown to be unlikely to be a match. John was 5 (meaning no match) and Pasty's was 4-4.5. I really think it was someone who knew john through work or knew the family intimately enough to get around the house, know money details etc. People talk, it's totally possible Patsy mentioned something at one point. Who knows.
Anonymous wrote:I think Patsy was batshit insane on top of mixing booze and benzos, a combo I've witnessed firsthand turn an individual into a frothing rage monster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly respected outside homicide detective felt strongly that it could be an intruder. Explains a lot about the lack of prints in the snow....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEM3l4WOcZE
Just watched this. Always felt it was someone in the family but this detective's intruder theory is very compelling. Particularly the point about the stun gun and the sexual nature of the murder. After seeing the crime scene photos in this documentary, it doesn't look like this murder was staged after the fact. I now have a whole new view.
Meh, the stun gun has been disproven.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly respected outside homicide detective felt strongly that it could be an intruder. Explains a lot about the lack of prints in the snow....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEM3l4WOcZE
Just watched this. Always felt it was someone in the family but this detective's intruder theory is very compelling. Particularly the point about the stun gun and the sexual nature of the murder. After seeing the crime scene photos in this documentary, it doesn't look like this murder was staged after the fact. I now have a whole new view.
Meh, the stun gun has been disproven.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly respected outside homicide detective felt strongly that it could be an intruder. Explains a lot about the lack of prints in the snow....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEM3l4WOcZE
Just watched this. Always felt it was someone in the family but this detective's intruder theory is very compelling. Particularly the point about the stun gun and the sexual nature of the murder. After seeing the crime scene photos in this documentary, it doesn't look like this murder was staged after the fact. I now have a whole new view.