Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re # of IB kids-someone mentioned on this thread that hArdy met their goal of 50 IB 6th graders this year and met 100% capacity for that grade as well.
Is that based on DCPS methodology of counting where students actually live or using Principal Pride's system, in which OOB students who attended an IB feeder are considered "in boundary"?
Two observations on this question:
1. it is a good example of the goalpost-moving that occurs with potential Hardy parents. They announce they want something - more IB families - then when they get it, they announce that it's not quite right - not the right kind of IB families. Reminds me of a few years ago - IB families met with DCPS officials and asked for a gifted and talented program at Hardy. They got it - the SEM program - and it's great. But of course, it was mostly ignored by these same IB families because it was not the right kind of gifted and talented program.
2. People who complain about the wrong kind of IB families (ie, families that lotteried into IB schools)....I am not calling you racists. But can you at least understand the perception that this creates? There is some logic to saying "I want my kid to go to school with other kids from his high-performing school because I know these will be high-performing kids." But to say "I only want my kids to go to school with high-performing kids from the white part of town"? How are we supposed to view statements that have that message?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re # of IB kids-someone mentioned on this thread that hArdy met their goal of 50 IB 6th graders this year and met 100% capacity for that grade as well.
Is that based on DCPS methodology of counting where students actually live or using Principal Pride's system, in which OOB students who attended an IB feeder are considered "in boundary"?
Anonymous wrote:Not a made up number-one straight from the horse's mouth, then later confirmed by 2 IB Hardy parents who had previously told me they had only reached 41 over the summer.
Way to be negative and wish for people investing in their community to fail!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re # of IB kids-someone mentioned on this thread that hArdy met their goal of 50 IB 6th graders this year and met 100% capacity for that grade as well.
Is that based on DCPS methodology of counting where students actually live or using Principal Pride's system, in which OOB students who attended an IB feeder are considered "in boundary"?
Anonymous wrote:Re # of IB kids-someone mentioned on this thread that hArdy met their goal of 50 IB 6th graders this year and met 100% capacity for that grade as well.
Anonymous wrote:There seems to be at least one person throughout this thread who is obsessed with denigrating Hardy. S/He has obsessively typed in baseless innuendo and unsupported "facts" within the prior few pages. And we STILL haven't found out how many IB students are at Hardy THIS YEAR.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^This is true. When we visited Hardy around 2010 it was clear that 6th grade students were at 4th or 5th grade feeder school levels. If there had been a track for on grade level students we would have considered it, but tracking is a no no around here.
Yes, I'm sure that when you walked through the school during that 30 minute visit you were able to take a reading level for every 6th grade student and assess their math levels because you and your spouse are long-time educators and only need a few minutes to determine the levels of 100+ students. You were able to take a quick look at the activity the teacher was doing with students in the class and were able to match it up with all the activities you saw in the feeder schools to make your judgement. Thanks so much for this very helpful comment. It really adds depth and dimension to this conversation.![]()
Fine if you want to be sarcastic, but I assume PP would have been visiting when kid was in grade 4 or 5 at a feeder, in order to assess Hardy as an option, and could easily have compared Hardy classroom work with what their own kid was doing at school in grade 4 or 5. This is easy to do at any age. For example if you have a 5 year old, you know the developmental milestones for a 5 year old and you can compare. Same with grade 6. Same with grade 11. Maybe not a double-blind peer-reviewed study, but enough to make an intelligent assessment of a school as a parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^This is true. When we visited Hardy around 2010 it was clear that 6th grade students were at 4th or 5th grade feeder school levels. If there had been a track for on grade level students we would have considered it, but tracking is a no no around here.
Yes, I'm sure that when you walked through the school during that 30 minute visit you were able to take a reading level for every 6th grade student and assess their math levels because you and your spouse are long-time educators and only need a few minutes to determine the levels of 100+ students. You were able to take a quick look at the activity the teacher was doing with students in the class and were able to match it up with all the activities you saw in the feeder schools to make your judgement. Thanks so much for this very helpful comment. It really adds depth and dimension to this conversation.![]()
Fine if you want to be sarcastic, but I assume PP would have been visiting when kid was in grade 4 or 5 at a feeder, in order to assess Hardy as an option, and could easily have compared Hardy classroom work with what their own kid was doing at school in grade 4 or 5. This is easy to do at any age. For example if you have a 5 year old, you know the developmental milestones for a 5 year old and you can compare. Same with grade 6. Same with grade 11. Maybe not a double-blind peer-reviewed study, but enough to make an intelligent assessment of a school as a parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^This is true. When we visited Hardy around 2010 it was clear that 6th grade students were at 4th or 5th grade feeder school levels. If there had been a track for on grade level students we would have considered it, but tracking is a no no around here.
Yes, I'm sure that when you walked through the school during that 30 minute visit you were able to take a reading level for every 6th grade student and assess their math levels because you and your spouse are long-time educators and only need a few minutes to determine the levels of 100+ students. You were able to take a quick look at the activity the teacher was doing with students in the class and were able to match it up with all the activities you saw in the feeder schools to make your judgement. Thanks so much for this very helpful comment. It really adds depth and dimension to this conversation.![]()