Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They announced Season 5 and it's Francesa and I am bored already.
Ugh!!!!! I wanted Eloise.
Anonymous wrote:The weird politics on Bridgerton are actually working against them doing a lesbian romance. Normally, a lesbian romance set in Regency England could be pretty steamy because the tension is built right in -- forbidden romance is an effective romance trope.
But as with Benedict's bisexuality last season, the show has gone out of its way to pretend that LGBTQ+ romances are just no big deal in this world. Benedict told Sophie about having affairs with men, and she was like "Huh, okay, sounds good!" Because god forbid one of their heroines be anything other than totally, 100% open minded in the style of a 2026 Millennial. Actually, the women on Girls and Sex Lives of College Girls struggled more with bisexual men than Sophie did.
And Francesca creates the same problem. I just think they are going to skip over some of the most clear sources of drama for this romance, in order to deliver a super-woke version of Regency England. Instead of a period drama, it's like watching Gen Zers hook up at Ren Fair. Ugh.
I’ll watch any type of coupling, as long as there is chemistry. I need some longing looks, heaving chests, and clenched fists set to the orchestral version of a recognizable pop song. Bridgerton has a formula. They’ll be fine IF they follow it.Anonymous wrote:Eloise will be last - big finale
Are they really going to have bodice ripping lesbian sex on Bridgerton? I could skip.
Anonymous wrote:I hoped for Eloise next, like most people, which is clearly why they are putting her last. Francesca is beautiful but boring.
Anonymous wrote:They announced Season 5 and it's Francesa and I am bored already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hated this season and thought that Sophie was SO poorly cast.
It's funny, I thought the actress was actually really good and the role reasonably well-written in parts. But at the same time, I also thought it really didn't "work." I did not buy--or even really understand--Sophie's connection to Benedict--or even to the larger Bridgerton family. So I sort of liked the character but it was like she was cut-and-paste out of a different story and plunked down in an awkward, unworkable Cinderella-Benedict character arc.
She was so blah, and frankly not beautiful enough to have completely won over BB in one scene.
Stop telling on yourself. She is absolutely beautiful.
+1 if you don’t think Sophie is beautiful, then certainly Kate is not.
DP I do not think Sophie is beautiful. I do think she is attractive, but beautiful is not how I would describe her. I would describe the actress who played the kind-hearted stepsister as beautiful. Kate is beautiful
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don’t think Kate is beautiful at all. I thought Edwina was prettier than Kate.
Kate is darker than Edwina, and a lot of people cannot see beyond the dark complexion to recognize beauty. But anyone looking at Simone Ashley and not seeing beauty is blind and/or prejudiced against darker skin. That does not take anything away from the actress Charithra Chandra, who played Edwina.
https://www.elle.com/culture/movies-tv/a39670256/simone-ashley-interview-may-2022/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7592760/
Anonymous wrote:I hoped for Eloise next, like most people, which is clearly why they are putting her last. Francesca is beautiful but boring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They announced Season 5 and it's Francesa and I am bored already.
They have all the costumes and all the sets already and they obvs have an audience and they don't need good story lines or scripts so it just makes sense...
Anonymous wrote:They announced Season 5 and it's Francesa and I am bored already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hated this season and thought that Sophie was SO poorly cast.
It's funny, I thought the actress was actually really good and the role reasonably well-written in parts. But at the same time, I also thought it really didn't "work." I did not buy--or even really understand--Sophie's connection to Benedict--or even to the larger Bridgerton family. So I sort of liked the character but it was like she was cut-and-paste out of a different story and plunked down in an awkward, unworkable Cinderella-Benedict character arc.
She was so blah, and frankly not beautiful enough to have completely won over BB in one scene.
Stop telling on yourself. She is absolutely beautiful.
+1 if you don’t think Sophie is beautiful, then certainly Kate is not.
DP I do not think Sophie is beautiful. I do think she is attractive, but beautiful is not how I would describe her. I would describe the actress who played the kind-hearted stepsister as beautiful. Kate is beautiful
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don’t think Kate is beautiful at all. I thought Edwina was prettier than Kate.