Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:thanks SC
so . . . tired.
Where does falsely attributing any positive comment about a club to a coach or owner of that club fall on the top ten list of most annoying DCUM comments? It's top three for me.
Anonymous wrote:thanks SC
Anonymous wrote:Ah, the hater(s) has reappeared. I think it’s the same person responding to their posts. At this point, either a troll or completely unhinged.
Anonymous wrote:Stockholm Syndrome 101
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for commentary from someone who was there and not people who just want to criticize coaches ad nauseum.
What's wrong with criticizing coaches who verbally abuse young children?
Nothing wrong. But “verbally abuse” is tossed around a lot here and the bar is low for what “gentle parents” consider abusive.
I've seen BSC players crying on the field after getting ripped by their coaches with language I consider to be way over the line. Is that sufficient for your definition of verbal abuse you clown?
The crazy thing is that these coaches allegedly ripping these children apart are still coaching. So everyone on here are keyboard warriors. There are year and years of accusations on this forum and there has been zero action to these coaches.
So no one has cared enough about other players to pursue claims. Or maybe there has been claims but have been found to be meritless.
So don’t listen to ppl on this board. Do your due diligence and if u see a problem, do something in real life.
When you’re dealing with children’s reputations and ultimate futures in a sport that operates in a very small world at the highest level….it is very easy to bash those for officially not coming forward when you don’t think about the long term ramifications that may have on the child in this sport. It’s a small world. Even the most anonymous reporting will eventually be found out and directed back to a specific child. Let’s be real.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for commentary from someone who was there and not people who just want to criticize coaches ad nauseum.
What's wrong with criticizing coaches who verbally abuse young children?
Nothing wrong. But “verbally abuse” is tossed around a lot here and the bar is low for what “gentle parents” consider abusive.
I've seen BSC players crying on the field after getting ripped by their coaches with language I consider to be way over the line. Is that sufficient for your definition of verbal abuse you clown?
The crazy thing is that these coaches allegedly ripping these children apart are still coaching. So everyone on here are keyboard warriors. There are year and years of accusations on this forum and there has been zero action to these coaches.
So no one has cared enough about other players to pursue claims. Or maybe there has been claims but have been found to be meritless.
So don’t listen to ppl on this board. Do your due diligence and if u see a problem, do something in real life.
When you’re dealing with children’s reputations and ultimate futures in a sport that operates in a very small world at the highest level….it is very easy to bash those for officially not coming forward when you don’t think about the long term ramifications that may have on the child in this sport. It’s a small world. Even the most anonymous reporting will eventually be found out and directed back to a specific child. Let’s be real.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for commentary from someone who was there and not people who just want to criticize coaches ad nauseum.
What's wrong with criticizing coaches who verbally abuse young children?
Nothing wrong. But “verbally abuse” is tossed around a lot here and the bar is low for what “gentle parents” consider abusive.
I've seen BSC players crying on the field after getting ripped by their coaches with language I consider to be way over the line. Is that sufficient for your definition of verbal abuse you clown?
Then don't have your kids play?
I've never seen kids crying on either of my kids' teams, in multiple sports. They both are high level. I see parents more upset sometimes about things than the players and even that is rare.
I do think it would probably be better for you to find another activity for your child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does such a huge club not stacking their pre-ecnl teams with their best players? They've been hardly impressive the last two weekends.
Pre-ecnl is usually the third team at younger ages, after ECNL 1 and 2, if that’s what you’re referring to.
U12 top team went undefeated at ECNL St. Louis last weekend.
U11 top team beat MD United 3-0 last weekend.
That’s not “hardly impressive” so you may be mistaken given BSC’s absurd team names. I think it’s been discussed here multiple times before how ridiculously stupid and confusing it is to call a third team pre-ECNL.
I know top team u11 well. 80% cannot juggle 20 times. Many of them do lacrosse and very athletic with very little soccer skills. But keep looking at scores and names.
My daughter played the top U12 team today and BSC played very nice possession based soccer with coaches who were supportive and didn't scream like maniacs. Seems like a lot of axes to grind on here.
Supportive and not screaming like a maniac is about the last way I would characterize SC from extensive experience. And there’s plenty of Veo to prove it. But maybe he’s changed or an outlier. Wasn’t there.
My kid is at FCDelco - I don't care one way or the other about BSC, just noticed this thread after we played them today (3-3 tie, came back from 3-1 down). I can give you a breakdown of every goal if you'd like, lol.
Please do