Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:29     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else watch the verdict? She leaned over and said something to Sanderson on her way out of court. Kinda wonder what she said.

Seemed a little inappropriate and risky.

Two narcissists going at each other.


I promise you she has a brain and probably told him she wished him well, and probably meant it. Most people aren't as mean spirited as you and others think.


Oh I also think she said something nice or wished him well. I just think she had no business approaching him. And that ii is self absorbed behavior to think he’d want to hear anything from her.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:29     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


Will add that I think she showed her true self.


How should one look while being sued in a frivolous lawsuit?


She skied into him. Fact.

She got away with it. American justice system.

No surprises here.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:28     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Where does your desire to please the celebrity come from?
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:27     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


So she shouldn't have lawyers defend her in this bad faith case?? He can quickly go bankrupt and might get away with not paying her legal fees.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:26     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


Will add that I think she showed her true self.


How should one look while being sued in a frivolous lawsuit?
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:26     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else watch the verdict? She leaned over and said something to Sanderson on her way out of court. Kinda wonder what she said.

Seemed a little inappropriate and risky.

Two narcissists going at each other.


I promise you she has a brain and probably told him she wished him well, and probably meant it. Most people aren't as mean spirited as you and others think.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:25     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


I would have laughed at him too. What an idiot.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:25     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Did anyone else watch the verdict? She leaned over and said something to Sanderson on her way out of court. Kinda wonder what she said.

Seemed a little inappropriate and risky.

Two narcissists going at each other.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:24     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


Will add that I think she showed her true self.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:22     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:I hope he can appeal w a better team.


He’ll still lose. Deal with it.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:21     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.


+1

Pyrrhic victory
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:21     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him


He calculated badly then.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:21     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t hate GP at all. I find her testimony impossible to believe as a skier. I find his more likely from a medical standpoint, and I find the spectacle to be wholly unnecessary and a David v Goliath. It’s distasteful. Like watching a public lashing by a winning party from the ruling class.


She was just suppose to hand over her money to this guy? He said she ruined his life.


He’s not wrong. Yes, she was. Like she was handed your money and mine just for being born
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:21     Subject: Re:Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Regardless of the outcome, her derisive, mocking facial expressions were obnoxious.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2023 19:20     Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:300k is nothing. I do believe his injuries and all the fracas is worth it. He’ll get at best 60% of that if his lawyers are working on contingency. He may get taxed.

If she wins he’s ruined and his children won’t inherit either. I think it’s a tragedy in which a rich person shows just how easily steered our judicial system is when money is mismatched.

Something many of our neighbors have known for far too long


She won already and he sued her, she had to defend herself and only requested $1 to make the point. If he's ruined, he can only blame himself.


Her legal fees would bankrupt him