Anonymous wrote:Pay what you owe. Unemployment is near where it was pre-pandemic. There are literally no more excuses for these freebies. Do you know why there's inflation? Because there is too much money everywhere. Making people pay what they owe is one way to reduce too much consumption that's driving so much inflation. That may be an unpopular view, but it's true. US household wealth and savings has exploded during the pandemic due to multiple stimuli and huge amounts of money printing. Time to take money out of the system and make people pay their bills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Yes, on average they do. But it depends... like implied originally a social science major from an Ivy can easily make their way into many very high paying jobs almost immediately if they want to. But that isn't because the system isn't a meritocracy. It's because many of those ivy social science majors are actually very intelligent and talented.
Engineering degrees are not that valuable, and STEM education overall is hugely oversold. I have an engineering degree. It was never that useful.
You will never convince me that a sociology or women’s and gender studies degree is harder than a STEM degree from basically anywhere. SO MANY talented kids go unnoticed because of the recruiting practices you’re supposedly fine with.
Lots of recruited athletes in sports no one cares about, donor kids and legacies gliding into elite consulting firms. Meanwhile the first Gen kid who paid their own way to get a physics degree with a high GPA from “podunk state” is forgotten.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Yes, on average they do. But it depends... like implied originally a social science major from an Ivy can easily make their way into many very high paying jobs almost immediately if they want to. But that isn't because the system isn't a meritocracy. It's because many of those ivy social science majors are actually very intelligent and talented.
Engineering degrees are not that valuable, and STEM education overall is hugely oversold. I have an engineering degree. It was never that useful.
Major eye roll here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Yes, on average they do. But it depends... like implied originally a social science major from an Ivy can easily make their way into many very high paying jobs almost immediately if they want to. But that isn't because the system isn't a meritocracy. It's because many of those ivy social science majors are actually very intelligent and talented.
Engineering degrees are not that valuable, and STEM education overall is hugely oversold. I have an engineering degree. It was never that useful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Yes, on average they do. But it depends... like implied originally a social science major from an Ivy can easily make their way into many very high paying jobs almost immediately if they want to. But that isn't because the system isn't a meritocracy. It's because many of those ivy social science majors are actually very intelligent and talented.
Engineering degrees are not that valuable, and STEM education overall is hugely oversold. I have an engineering degree. It was never that useful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Yes, on average they do. But it depends... like implied originally a social science major from an Ivy can easily make their way into many very high paying jobs almost immediately if they want to. But that isn't because the system isn't a meritocracy. It's because many of those ivy social science majors are actually very intelligent and talented.
Engineering degrees are not that valuable, and STEM education overall is hugely oversold. I have an engineering degree. It was never that useful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
Anonymous wrote:I'm trying to figure out the root issue that this policy is trying to solve. I gather it is: The cost of higher education is increasingly unattainably high. That cost is either preventing people from getting that higher education or causing them to have limited earning power upon graduation.
The way to solve that is through forward looking policies that reduce the cost and/or provide more alternative pathways to financial stability that do not require higher education.
What I don't understand is how loan forgiveness actually solves the root problem. It does nothing to help anyone entering college or the workforce in the coming years, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who never went to college and never had a federal student loan will wind up paying for those of higher socioeconomic status who did. No wonder the wealthy are going woke: many progressive policies benefit them rather than working saps.
I assure that my tax dollars are currently funding all sorts of rural initiatives that are not to my own benefit.
I promise you that if this country was all about benefits and initiatives being associated with those whose tax $ are funding it, a large portion of this country would go bankrupt.
I, for one, didn't appreciate a massive farm bailout that was created by Trump's idiotic tariff fight.
Support for our own country's agriculture is in the interest of anyone who eats food.
You mean corn and soy beans? This is what America grows and it’s largely used as cattle feed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.
A state school engineering major isn’t being offered a $110k+ job at 22 from MBB or Oliver Wyman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US is not a meritocracy. If it were, a STEM major from a random university would get the same or better job opportunities than someone with a social science degree from an Ivy that they were admitted to as a legacy.
Engineers coming out of college make more than social science majors.