Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
In my experience this is true. The flip side of this is that some parents have been planning for private/catholic HS all along, so will go to SH or even EH/Jefferson because it is more convenient than the charters. But they keep this part quiet and then it is a real disappointment to the parents who take a chance on the DCPS schools figuring that the cohort will stick together for HS.
Who are the folks who are delusional enough to think that even a small number of parents are going to choose Eastern?
Right. Even the most gung-ho boosters on Ward 6 elementary/middle schools never speak of Eastern.
We started at a HRCS but are IB for SH. We are moved to another charter for 5th. SH is something we had considered and is still an option for us through 8th. There is zero chance, I mean not a snowball's chance in hell, that my kid would ever go to Eastern. Not even a consideration. Not for a moment. And I don't know any other parents in our area who would ever send their kids there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
In my experience this is true. The flip side of this is that some parents have been planning for private/catholic HS all along, so will go to SH or even EH/Jefferson because it is more convenient than the charters. But they keep this part quiet and then it is a real disappointment to the parents who take a chance on the DCPS schools figuring that the cohort will stick together for HS.
Who are the folks who are delusional enough to think that even a small number of parents are going to choose Eastern?
Right. Even the most gung-ho boosters on Ward 6 elementary/middle schools never speak of Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
In my experience this is true. The flip side of this is that some parents have been planning for private/catholic HS all along, so will go to SH or even EH/Jefferson because it is more convenient than the charters. But they keep this part quiet and then it is a real disappointment to the parents who take a chance on the DCPS schools figuring that the cohort will stick together for HS.
Who are the folks who are delusional enough to think that even a small number of parents are going to choose Eastern?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High achieving boy who went on to doing very well in a test-in high school: We went with Jefferson and never had any regrets. I'm convinced he'd have done well at Elliot-Hine or Stuart-Hobson. He'd have been fine at Basis, too. The reason he excelled at Jefferson and became the academically strong and well-rounded person he now is is because he had committed and caring teachers who "get" middle schoolers and who worked with him to get him where he wanted and let him own the process. And because it's close by, he was able to pursue sports and scouts, which enriched his pandemic experience. And he had a set of genuine and funny and also some academically strong friends. Had he been in a place like Basis, he'd have become a kid worried and "pressed" about academics. As it stands, he became a caring, well-rounded, and academically strong teenager.
Good for your kid. But I am not sure how you "know" how your kid would have done at other schools.
Looking at PARCC, I certainly agree that there is no comparison between Jefferson and Basis:
Jefferson: 36.6% 4+ ELA, 20.9% 4+ math
Basis: 80.2% 4+ ELA, 64.5% 4+ math
The BASIS score is actually much lower than I had expected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High achieving boy who went on to doing very well in a test-in high school: We went with Jefferson and never had any regrets. I'm convinced he'd have done well at Elliot-Hine or Stuart-Hobson. He'd have been fine at Basis, too. The reason he excelled at Jefferson and became the academically strong and well-rounded person he now is is because he had committed and caring teachers who "get" middle schoolers and who worked with him to get him where he wanted and let him own the process. And because it's close by, he was able to pursue sports and scouts, which enriched his pandemic experience. And he had a set of genuine and funny and also some academically strong friends. Had he been in a place like Basis, he'd have become a kid worried and "pressed" about academics. As it stands, he became a caring, well-rounded, and academically strong teenager.
Good for your kid. But I am not sure how you "know" how your kid would have done at other schools.
Looking at PARCC, I certainly agree that there is no comparison between Jefferson and Basis:
Jefferson: 36.6% 4+ ELA, 20.9% 4+ math
Basis: 80.2% 4+ ELA, 64.5% 4+ math
What if any school has better scores?
The BASIS score is actually much lower than I had expected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
In my experience this is true. The flip side of this is that some parents have been planning for private/catholic HS all along, so will go to SH or even EH/Jefferson because it is more convenient than the charters. But they keep this part quiet and then it is a real disappointment to the parents who take a chance on the DCPS schools figuring that the cohort will stick together for HS.
Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High achieving boy who went on to doing very well in a test-in high school: We went with Jefferson and never had any regrets. I'm convinced he'd have done well at Elliot-Hine or Stuart-Hobson. He'd have been fine at Basis, too. The reason he excelled at Jefferson and became the academically strong and well-rounded person he now is is because he had committed and caring teachers who "get" middle schoolers and who worked with him to get him where he wanted and let him own the process. And because it's close by, he was able to pursue sports and scouts, which enriched his pandemic experience. And he had a set of genuine and funny and also some academically strong friends. Had he been in a place like Basis, he'd have become a kid worried and "pressed" about academics. As it stands, he became a caring, well-rounded, and academically strong teenager.
Good for your kid. But I am not sure how you "know" how your kid would have done at other schools.
Looking at PARCC, I certainly agree that there is no comparison between Jefferson and Basis:
Jefferson: 36.6% 4+ ELA, 20.9% 4+ math
Basis: 80.2% 4+ ELA, 64.5% 4+ math
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
Some parents, not many. Come on, no secret that SH throws a bunch of kids working at an 7th, 8th, even 9th grade level into the very same social studies and science classes as kids working 2,3 even 4 grade levels behind them.
What middle school tracks for social studies and science?
You have to look at the big picture to answer the question honestly. Deal doesn't have many poor kids, so less differentiation with social studies and sciences needed for effective instruction than EotP. Latin offers unusually small classes. BASIS offers a far more serious middle school science curriculum than DCPS and doesn't sanction social promotion past 6th grade.
Meanwhile, the middle schools for Capitol Hill offer a losing combination of epic learning gaps between high SES and low SES students (many more of the latter than the former in classes) and fairly large class sizes. That's why most in-boundary parents still vote with their feet away from these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Come on, those stats are three years old.
Anonymous wrote:High achieving boy who went on to doing very well in a test-in high school: We went with Jefferson and never had any regrets. I'm convinced he'd have done well at Elliot-Hine or Stuart-Hobson. He'd have been fine at Basis, too. The reason he excelled at Jefferson and became the academically strong and well-rounded person he now is is because he had committed and caring teachers who "get" middle schoolers and who worked with him to get him where he wanted and let him own the process. And because it's close by, he was able to pursue sports and scouts, which enriched his pandemic experience. And he had a set of genuine and funny and also some academically strong friends. Had he been in a place like Basis, he'd have become a kid worried and "pressed" about academics. As it stands, he became a caring, well-rounded, and academically strong teenager.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many parents bail for Basis or Latin l/ll (if they can) not because SH is that bad but to have a guarantee HS option (and no application headaches) that is better than Eastern.
Some parents, not many. Come on, no secret that SH throws a bunch of kids working at an 7th, 8th, even 9th grade level into the very same social studies and science classes as kids working 2,3 even 4 grade levels behind them.
What middle school tracks for social studies and science?
Anonymous wrote:High achieving boy who went on to doing very well in a test-in high school: We went with Jefferson and never had any regrets. I'm convinced he'd have done well at Elliot-Hine or Stuart-Hobson. He'd have been fine at Basis, too. The reason he excelled at Jefferson and became the academically strong and well-rounded person he now is is because he had committed and caring teachers who "get" middle schoolers and who worked with him to get him where he wanted and let him own the process. And because it's close by, he was able to pursue sports and scouts, which enriched his pandemic experience. And he had a set of genuine and funny and also some academically strong friends. Had he been in a place like Basis, he'd have become a kid worried and "pressed" about academics. As it stands, he became a caring, well-rounded, and academically strong teenager.