Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We will never know, but perhaps if an SRO was in the building, they could have formed a relationship with the students and could have prevented this.

And perhaps in the course of building that relationship he would have also placed 10 other teenagers into the school-to-prison pipeline! Which will eventually maim them as well.

Is there a study that shows that having an SRO in the school causes a 10x increase in the school to prison pipeline, or even 2x increase?

Yes, data to support the rhetoric would be useful.

There are peer reviewed studies that support the school to prison pipeline as well as peer reviewed studies that support the argument that SROs are effective. None of these studies involve Montgomery County, MD.

One of the news outlets found the shooters address by searching his name in the moco arrest database so he had a record and an SRO would have been aware of that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know who the student was and who was shot.

If so, share.

We all know what really happened. So does cops. Snitches get stitches so not talking

Who is we?

They have identified the student who is responsible for the shooting. They are charging him as an adult.

Good.

He needs to go away for a long time.

Is this an example of the school to prison pipeline?

Kid literally got arrested at school and won’t be seeing the outside of a prison cell for a decade or more. He’s not getting pretrial release.

When jawanda and cronies talk about the school to prison pipeline needing to end , what they are really saying is the pipeline still starts at school but then it branches off to hospital or death for some innocent kids before returning to the prison anyway.

They don't care and are using it as a campaign platform. Jawanda's kids are in private school.

Obviously we're on our way to reinstatement of SROs in schools, and thank goodness for that. I'll never understand people who wanted to defund police, etc. I'm all for left-wing policies, but only when they actually make sense. If you want to address racism in law enforcement, you make make police academies MORE selective, and you lure in smarter candidates with more attractive pay (same method if you want to increase teaching standards).The dumb people will never react well in crisis situations regardless of the training they get! You can't staff such positions with the poorly-paid and the ones without critical thinking skills, and then act surprised that they're incompetent.

We also need metal detectors and random bag searches.

I'm a European who never had to deal with shootings in school, but did live through middle and high school under terrorist bomb threat. Our school perimeter was secure against cars with bombs. Anti-terrorist police would patrol the streets. Once some idiots spray-painted on a school wall, and we had a knife fight in the street between rival schools, so it was decided our bags would be searched for weeks after that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t high schools have security guards?

They do, and there was one at Magruder when this happened. An SRO couldn’t have stopped this, just like the SROs in Parkland couldn’t stop the mass shooting there.

There’s absolutely no way you can prove that statement. We’ve tried the no-SRO route and it isn’t working. Perhaps it’s time for logic to prevail so students can once again have more resources in schools. Yes, the SRO is a resource. At the very least, having an SRO at the school would have helped in those first crucial minutes, leading to a quicker response time.

Perhaps it’s time to stop hating police simply because they are police.

This. And data actually shows that SROs only accounted for 3% of the arrests in mcps. Most of their time was spent preventing crimes and violence at schools. They know the student body and knew which kids had a beef with one another and if something was brewing. We don't have that in schools these days.

In this case an SRO would have been aware of who had a problem with the victim and would have found the shooter sooner than TWO HOURS later.

SROs prevent violence often. The uptick in school violence since their removal -not just here, but in many communities, proves it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t high schools have security guards?

They do, and there was one at Magruder when this happened. An SRO couldn’t have stopped this, just like the SROs in Parkland couldn’t stop the mass shooting there.

There’s absolutely no way you can prove that statement. We’ve tried the no-SRO route and it isn’t working. Perhaps it’s time for logic to prevail so students can once again have more resources in schools. Yes, the SRO is a resource. At the very least, having an SRO at the school would have helped in those first crucial minutes, leading to a quicker response time.

Perhaps it’s time to stop hating police simply because they are police.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know who the student was and who was shot.

If so, share.

We all know what really happened. So does cops. Snitches get stitches so not talking

Who is we?

They have identified the student who is responsible for the shooting. They are charging him as an adult.

Good.

He needs to go away for a long time.

Is this an example of the school to prison pipeline?

Kid literally got arrested at school and won’t be seeing the outside of a prison cell for a decade or more. He’s not getting pretrial release.

When jawanda and cronies talk about the school to prison pipeline needing to end , what they are really saying is the pipeline still starts at school but then it branches off to hospital or death for some innocent kids before returning to the prison anyway.

Anonymous wrote:Don’t high schools have security guards?

They do, and there was one at Magruder when this happened. An SRO couldn’t have stopped this, just like the SROs in Parkland couldn’t stop the mass shooting there.

So, ghostbgun’s are like a kit and you build it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it too soon to discuss the fact that monifa grabbed her pink coat with the leapord print collar instead of something more appropriate for the situation

With the matching pink mask. She was an hour late which delayed the kids being released but that delay was important, because she had to look good for cameras.

You can’t be serious, right?

I wish I was. She was an hour late for the press conference photo op and purposefully delayed the release of the kids but she definitely had time to make sure that that her pink mask matched her pink coat with the animal print collar. It provides a small window into what her priorities are and it’s clearly not the kids.

Sounds like a conspiracy. Hmmm

The guy next to her is wearing a pink tie so I hope you’re outraged at his choice as well.

I am. Screw that guy. What's his name?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Probably a ghost gun. Order them online

Good grief with the ghost guns.

1) You have to be 21 to order one.
2) It's not a firearm when you receive it.
3) You need a good router, skills, plated drill bits, a vice, tapping oil, and a jig to mill the lower.
4) It will cost over $1000 with all the tools and parts you need.
5) When completed, it's a firearm like any other but without a serial number. Which honestly, doesn't do sh*t anyway.
6) It's probably easier to give Devonte $200 for a stolen .38 with the serial number removed.

Or take it from your parents’ glove compartment. Or closet, or nightstand, or wherever.

Ok, clearly I hadn’t read through to the end of the thread. Yikes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This student just went to class after he shot the other student. Acted like nothing happened.. the one who got shot was unconscious state. Wonder how they figured out who the shooter was?

Yikes! I just read he was located in a classroom. I assumed an empty one, not back to his class.

It was NOT an empty classroom. Full of students.