Anonymous
10/19/2021 18:17
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Two MORE cases today 10-8 at Wakefield, not in athletes.
It looks like there must have been some corrections to the earlier numbers, though, because the current 7-day chart only shows 16 student cases at Wakefield but the numbers list here total 22.
I don't think so. The bar chart is just counting 7-days in a weird way maybe. "This week" is 16 positive cases and "Last week" is 8 positive cases on the two pie charts for Wakefield. 24 positive cases total.
Which is still less than what’s been listed here for that time period. This has been going on since APS implemented the dashboard and has been addressed many times (including in a disclaimer on the APS dashboard). They post the raw numbers from qualtrics but then the numbers can be revised downward as they account for user errors in completing the survey, double counting, etc.
There is no double counting. The chart above includes students AND staff. The dashboard lists them separately.
Anonymous
10/17/2021 16:19
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APE is endorsing….Kadera for school board. I guess since the other guy didn’t bother to respond it was a no brainer.
https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=12119a80f9eb7a7322f4902ae&id=6c58a31e5a
When is the governor scorecard coming? Should be good…
The other guy is a complete whacko. Seriously, he is mentally ill.
APE could have easily not endorsed. They actually issues a detailed statement as to why they are endorsing Kadera:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d9zq22Kls9XPWsktdasG5NI2fY9UtQPm/view
This is a great statement. Thank you for posting.
Anonymous
10/17/2021 15:40
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APE is endorsing….Kadera for school board. I guess since the other guy didn’t bother to respond it was a no brainer.
https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=12119a80f9eb7a7322f4902ae&id=6c58a31e5a
When is the governor scorecard coming? Should be good…
The other guy is a complete whacko. Seriously, he is mentally ill.
APE could have easily not endorsed. They actually issues a detailed statement as to why they are endorsing Kadera:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d9zq22Kls9XPWsktdasG5NI2fY9UtQPm/view
Anonymous
10/17/2021 14:47
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:APE is endorsing….Kadera for school board. I guess since the other guy didn’t bother to respond it was a no brainer.
https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=12119a80f9eb7a7322f4902ae&id=6c58a31e5a
When is the governor scorecard coming? Should be good…
The other guy is a complete whacko. Seriously, he is mentally ill.
Anonymous
10/17/2021 14:01
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
APE is endorsing….Kadera for school board. I guess since the other guy didn’t bother to respond it was a no brainer.
https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=12119a80f9eb7a7322f4902ae&id=6c58a31e5a
When is the governor scorecard coming? Should be good…
https://us7.campaign-archive.com/?u=12119a80f9eb7a7322f4902ae&id=6c58a31e5a
When is the governor scorecard coming? Should be good…
Anonymous
10/09/2021 11:22
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
I just counted 23 student cases at WHS since 10-1.
https://apsva.co1.qualtrics.com/public-dashboard/v0/dashboard/60d5f170495a0000108b9941#/dashboard/60d5f170495a0000108b9941?pageId=Page_749e04aa-9c5e-44dc-b924-af5889aaacb9
https://apsva.co1.qualtrics.com/public-dashboard/v0/dashboard/60d5f170495a0000108b9941#/dashboard/60d5f170495a0000108b9941?pageId=Page_749e04aa-9c5e-44dc-b924-af5889aaacb9
Anonymous
10/08/2021 22:12
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Two MORE cases today 10-8 at Wakefield, not in athletes.
It looks like there must have been some corrections to the earlier numbers, though, because the current 7-day chart only shows 16 student cases at Wakefield but the numbers list here total 22.
I don't think so. The bar chart is just counting 7-days in a weird way maybe. "This week" is 16 positive cases and "Last week" is 8 positive cases on the two pie charts for Wakefield. 24 positive cases total.
Which is still less than what’s been listed here for that time period. This has been going on since APS implemented the dashboard and has been addressed many times (including in a disclaimer on the APS dashboard). They post the raw numbers from qualtrics but then the numbers can be revised downward as they account for user errors in completing the survey, double counting, etc.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 22:08
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Two MORE cases today 10-8 at Wakefield, not in athletes.
It looks like there must have been some corrections to the earlier numbers, though, because the current 7-day chart only shows 16 student cases at Wakefield but the numbers list here total 22.
I don't think so. The bar chart is just counting 7-days in a weird way maybe. "This week" is 16 positive cases and "Last week" is 8 positive cases on the two pie charts for Wakefield. 24 positive cases total.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 21:25
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Two MORE cases today 10-8 at Wakefield, not in athletes.
It looks like there must have been some corrections to the earlier numbers, though, because the current 7-day chart only shows 16 student cases at Wakefield but the numbers list here total 22.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 19:36
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Two MORE cases today 10-8 at Wakefield, not in athletes.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 19:35
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
We already know it's spreading at WHS. Look at those dates and numbers.
It's Covid denying to say without any evidence that all of those cases must be asymptomatic. Or that it's not an outbreak. Or that it's just a few cases.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 10:51
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Let’s work off some facts for people who can’t check the dashboard. Wakefield positive cases.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
9/27 - 1 student
9/28 - 1 staff
10/1 - 1 student
10/2 - 6 students
10/5 - 7 students
10/6 - 6 students, 1 staff
10/ 7 - 1 student, 1 staff
I think we’ll find out early next week if this is spreading.
I am confused what this has to do with APE. Can someone explain how anyone in APE has been Covid denying? I think there can be valid disagreements about what rust mitigation strategies are most effective, but that does not deny Covid. We can have a factual debate about whether “test to stay” is a good approach, but supporting “test to stay” is very on-brand for APE which was formed to get kids back in school while taking reasonable steps to reduce Covid risk.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 10:34
Subject: [APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Unless you are speaking for APE, please take the covid denial argument elsewhere.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 10:13
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:
Probably the same type of parent who doesn't want to test their kid and sends them to school with "allergies"
Can't deny these are actual cases so instead they baselessly speculate that they must be asymptomatic. It's so desperate really.
The virus will be here the rest of our life. These people are almost all vaccinated. Even if they weren't vaccinated (or have siblings less than 12), they have less than a vaccinated 30 year old.
Your reaction has no logic to the fact this virus will be here the rest of our lives. 0 logic.
Anonymous
10/08/2021 09:19
Subject: Re:[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Covid denial runs deep with the APE crew. Can't even admit 20 cases is a rather big problem.
It depends on how sick they are, doesn’t it? 20 positives where everyone recovers in a week or less seems like NBD.
Or they have no symptoms and are not sick at all. So yeah, 20 of those is really NBD.
You are totally speculating that they all have no symptoms.
No way all 21 have no symptoms. No way.
Well you're speculating too. So . . .
Yes I think your claim that all 21 have no symptoms is HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely and I said so.
You so want this to be NBD cuz it gets in the way of your covid denying agenda. so sorry, covid doesn't work that way.
Probably the same type of parent who doesn't want to test their kid and sends them to school with "allergies"
Can't deny these are actual cases so instead they baselessly speculate that they must be asymptomatic. It's so desperate really.