Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

Wow, women at age 29 and 30 were prettier than when they're post menopause age 55. Shocking.

She's not hideous because she went from 30-55. She's hideous because along the way she destroyed her face with cheap filler.

She was beautiful at 30 and would likely still be beautiful if she had done less.

Yeah, aging is not the problem here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

Wow, women at age 29 and 30 were prettier than when they're post menopause age 55. Shocking.

She's not hideous because she went from 30-55. She's hideous because along the way she destroyed her face with cheap filler.

She was beautiful at 30 and would likely still be beautiful if she had done less.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

Wow, women at age 29 and 30 were prettier than when they're post menopause age 55. Shocking.

If she'd kept her face she'd be fine. Her bone structure is a bit like Katherine Hepburn, who looked fabulous until the day she died.

I was at the Joan Jett concert last week and she looks fabulous. She does her hair to keep her signature look but clearly has done no work on her face. She’s oh great shape and looks aiuthentoc despite decades of second hand smoke. The wrinkles are way better than filler face.

Joan Jett looks like she’s had work done to me but there’s a huge difference between having cosmetic procedures done and trying to stop time. The people who attempt to eliminate every single sign of aging end up looking crazy. You have to leave some signs of aging in order to still look like yourself!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

Wow, women at age 29 and 30 were prettier than when they're post menopause age 55. Shocking.

If she'd kept her face she'd be fine. Her bone structure is a bit like Katherine Hepburn, who looked fabulous until the day she died.

I was at the Joan Jett concert last week and she looks fabulous. She does her hair to keep her signature look but clearly has done no work on her face. She’s oh great shape and looks aiuthentoc despite decades of second hand smoke. The wrinkles are way better than filler face.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:




This gives you an idea

I can’t unsee the Vance portrait.

I missed the Vance portrait because my eyes immediately went to that horrid skirt and green shirt combo.

Anonymous wrote:




This gives you an idea

I can’t unsee the Vance portrait.