Anonymous wrote:At BB’s hearing it was said CB was held down while BB stabbed her. Since JR had been shot that only leaves JPM to have held her arms at her sides. Shocking that she will face no consequences for that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6 minute long raw body cam footage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_Pl-uVkfU

It’s saying the video is restricted

Anonymous wrote:6 minute long raw body cam footage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_Pl-uVkfU

Anonymous wrote:6 minute long raw body cam footage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_Pl-uVkfU

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In addition to a safe word (to stop such a situation/withdraw consent), I'm surprised standard operating procedures don't require a "confirmation" type word or phrase. I feel like you see this a lot in spy movies - both parties need to say a particular thing to confirm they are both in on it.

Very sad for the victims.

Agree. If I were CB’s mom, I’d sue the website and everyone responsible for it.

Sue the website for what?

The crime was planned on their site. They had no safeguards, like user verification or safe word requirements, to prevent this.

This is by far, the most ignorant post I’ve seen here….

You're too kind. More like most batsh@# crazy post of all time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it that CB’s family is not the one living in the house with the little girl?
Nothing they can do in this case?

For the neighbors… Have you noticed anything new in the last couple days ? Is the kid ok?

BB would not let CB's parents or sibling see the daughter.

Yea, but now he’s in jail. His family should be kicked out of there…

That’s what we would hope for but there are reasons it can’t happen like that.
An incarcerated person can still own property including real estate. The more likely case for getting his family out of the house is that it goes into foreclosure and the mortgage holder takes the property.

I doubt that a person can inherit from someone they killed. So BB won't end up owning the house, but it will probably go into foreclosure and the child will get nothing out of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it that CB’s family is not the one living in the house with the little girl?
Nothing they can do in this case?

For the neighbors… Have you noticed anything new in the last couple days ? Is the kid ok?

BB would not let CB's parents or sibling see the daughter.

Yea, but now he’s in jail. His family should be kicked out of there…

That’s what we would hope for but there are reasons it can’t happen like that.
An incarcerated person can still own property including real estate. The more likely case for getting his family out of the house is that it goes into foreclosure and the mortgage holder takes the property.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB's heirs will get the house if there is any value left. BB probably took out mortgages against it to the max so that he could pay JM's legal bills and pay for his living expenses while on suspension from IRS, + he needed to bankroll his plans to move to Brazil.

The house will be hard to sell, and will only sell at a huge discount b/c -- surprise -- not many people want to buy a house where two people were murdered. So, sadly, the little girl will probably get nothing out of the house. There is probably nothing left.

Hopefully, CB's parents can get custody asap, and get the child into therapy for the trauma of being abandoned by both parents.

The daughter wasn’t abandoned by both parents. Her father murdered her mother.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In addition to a safe word (to stop such a situation/withdraw consent), I'm surprised standard operating procedures don't require a "confirmation" type word or phrase. I feel like you see this a lot in spy movies - both parties need to say a particular thing to confirm they are both in on it.

Very sad for the victims.

Agree. If I were CB’s mom, I’d sue the website and everyone responsible for it.

Sue the website for what?

The crime was planned on their site. They had no safeguards, like user verification or safe word requirements, to prevent this.

This is by far, the most ignorant post I’ve seen here….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it that CB’s family is not the one living in the house with the little girl?
Nothing they can do in this case?

For the neighbors… Have you noticed anything new in the last couple days ? Is the kid ok?

BB would not let CB's parents or sibling see the daughter.

Yea, but now he’s in jail. His family should be kicked out of there…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part that is unclear is wouldn't CB seem confused and uninterested and wouldn't JR pick up on her body language? There had to be some consensus? Or, did "CB" say, "I am going to act surprised..." Which is also a weird thing to say...

I also don't understand but why did JR willingly agree to drive 30 minutes (in rush hour) from Springfield to Reston at 7am to do this kind of sexual behavior?

How would a safe word have helped? CB wouldn’t have known it… She didn’t actually talk to JR. Maybe there was a safe word for all we know. Maybe JR saw she was terrified and checked, “Grover?” And CB, terrified for her life, was like “WTF are you talking about?”

Please keep in mind that JR did not actually hurt her in anyway. This could have been a ruse with a plumber for most purposes, the fetish angle was just so that they could falsely blame JR and people (like you) would believe it because (like you) they’d be so focused on the fetish aspect they’d forget people who have this kind of fetish don’t actually hurt people.

This totally! It has been repeated many times, JR had no history of violence towards women. He wasn't a rapist, he was a guy who was murdered ruthlessly while believing he was play acting with a woman he thought invited him over to do this and left the door unlocked for him. It is reported that he thought he had been communicating with her for weeks, and that he spoke to her on the phone first thinking this was consensual play. He was tricked, and murdered, while Christine was tricked into thinking her husband wanted to be married to her and would love and protect her. They were tricked, trapped, and brutally murdered because BB thought it would be exciting to commit a thrill kill murder and fool everyone. Do not play into his hands as witnesses. He was a disgusting monster that took their lives with the help of his lover the nanny JM.

It would seem more likely that BB forced JR to hold CB down at gunpoint in order for JR to be shot in the “correct position”. It seems like a vulnerable point in BB’s plan to rely on JR sticking to the script when he was an innocent. Perhaps he even tried to force JR to stab CB so that his scenario would fit.

That is not what has been reported in the past day. JPM says BB rushed in the room saying "police" then shot JR in the head. Then stabbed Christine.