Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another example of our media failing us ...
Just catching up this morning on the last few weeks of news coverage here stateside, and came across the revolting incident late last month involving a CBS "journalist" doing the usual Zionist bullshit with an accomplished guest who dared to call balls and strikes fairly in their coverage of the Middle East conflict.
Why do we tolerate people at the table with blatant conflicts of interest? This "journalist" has an ex-wife and two children living in Israel, is currently married to a Jewish woman, and has converted to Judaism himself. How on earth was he even allowed to participate in ANY conversation involving accountability for Israel's policies and actions?
Why do we continue to tolerate only Jewish voices at the table when the self-styled "Jewish homeland" is repeatedly engaged in what an array of established, reputable human rights organizations have characterized as genocide? Did we permit members of the Nazi party to occupy every seat at the table in the 1930s and 1940s, and allow them drive the conversation regarding their own actions during WWII?
It's insanity. We are living during a time when the credibility of the U.S. is being cleaved away at an unprecedented rate, and the best we can do is double down with so many individuals possessed of outrageous conflicts of interest driving our national conversation?
Those criticizing Israel aren't being entirely objective and aren't calling the balls and strikes either. For example Israel's strikes around Beirut. The critics yell about how Israel is bombing residential areas, but conveniently leave out the fact that the bombings have been resulting in many secondary explosions (Hezbollah ammunition cooking off), even uncontrolled Hezbollah rockets flying off in random directions as a result of the bombing. Hezbollah has been attacking Israel for decades, and has massive stockpiles of weapons that they use, many of those weapons received from Iran. Those are in fact legitimate targets. It's Hezbollah's fault if nearby civilians get injured or killed, because even if Israel had not attacked, the same secondary explosions could have happened if there were an accidental fire. The weapons caches should never have been in civilian areas. This same thing repeated itself throughout Gaza as well. Yet nobody criticizing Israel ever seems to be able to bring themselves to admit facts like this.
In the process, Biden has made himself look weak and hurt the election chances of Vice President Kamala Harris. Polls show a close election, and Harris has been lagging with groups who are opposed to Biden’s Middle Eastern policy, not just Arab Americans (a crucial demographic in the swing state of Michigan) but also young people more broadly.
The electoral consequences, however important, actually understate the damage Biden has done. Biden’s unconditional support for Israel is the greatest American foreign policy disaster since the Iraq War (which Biden also supported). Like the Iraq War, it is a catastrophe whose impact will be felt for decades to come in the destabilization of the Middle East and the international order.
Writing in The New Republic, Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy, observed:
Biden wasn’t hoodwinked by Netanyahu any more than he was by George W. Bush when he chose to back the Iraq War. He chose this path, and stayed on it despite constant warnings of exactly where it was leading. Having done so, when he exits the White House, he and his team will leave this world a more dangerous and lawless place, America’s credibility more broken, the so-called “rules-based order” even more “so-called” than when he entered.[/quote]
https://www.thenation.com/article/world/biden-israel-policy-disaster/
Yep this is not just on Biden but everyone in that administration.
Anonymous wrote:From the WP: "“I am a moderate, but after this I am with Hezbollah,” shouted Ameen Kabbni, a 55-year-old man with graying hair whose apartment across the street was wrecked by the attack. “They are pushing me to be with the resistance,” he said, referring to the Iranian-backed armed groups that include Hamas in Gaza and the Houthis in Yemen, alongside Hezbollah."
While I agree with the PP that in conflict not one is ever 100% right and nobody is 100% wrong, it's so clear to me that the human aspect of this conflict is being brushed off by many who support Israel as collateral damage/terrorists' fault for hiding among civilians/secondary blasts due to munitions/etc etc). This human and personal cost is real and it does not increase the love for Israel, in fact, the opposite.
I really do not see how this wraps up well for anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another example of our media failing us ...
Just catching up this morning on the last few weeks of news coverage here stateside, and came across the revolting incident late last month involving a CBS "journalist" doing the usual Zionist bullshit with an accomplished guest who dared to call balls and strikes fairly in their coverage of the Middle East conflict.
Why do we tolerate people at the table with blatant conflicts of interest? This "journalist" has an ex-wife and two children living in Israel, is currently married to a Jewish woman, and has converted to Judaism himself. How on earth was he even allowed to participate in ANY conversation involving accountability for Israel's policies and actions?
Why do we continue to tolerate only Jewish voices at the table when the self-styled "Jewish homeland" is repeatedly engaged in what an array of established, reputable human rights organizations have characterized as genocide? Did we permit members of the Nazi party to occupy every seat at the table in the 1930s and 1940s, and allow them drive the conversation regarding their own actions during WWII?
It's insanity. We are living during a time when the credibility of the U.S. is being cleaved away at an unprecedented rate, and the best we can do is double down with so many individuals possessed of outrageous conflicts of interest driving our national conversation?
Those criticizing Israel aren't being entirely objective and aren't calling the balls and strikes either. For example Israel's strikes around Beirut. The critics yell about how Israel is bombing residential areas, but conveniently leave out the fact that the bombings have been resulting in many secondary explosions (Hezbollah ammunition cooking off), even uncontrolled Hezbollah rockets flying off in random directions as a result of the bombing. Hezbollah has been attacking Israel for decades, and has massive stockpiles of weapons that they use, many of those weapons received from Iran. Those are in fact legitimate targets. It's Hezbollah's fault if nearby civilians get injured or killed, because even if Israel had not attacked, the same secondary explosions could have happened if there were an accidental fire. The weapons caches should never have been in civilian areas. This same thing repeated itself throughout Gaza as well. Yet nobody criticizing Israel ever seems to be able to bring themselves to admit facts like this.
Anonymous wrote:Another example of our media failing us ...
Just catching up this morning on the last few weeks of news coverage here stateside, and came across the revolting incident late last month involving a CBS "journalist" doing the usual Zionist bullshit with an accomplished guest who dared to call balls and strikes fairly in their coverage of the Middle East conflict.
Why do we tolerate people at the table with blatant conflicts of interest? This "journalist" has an ex-wife and two children living in Israel, is currently married to a Jewish woman, and has converted to Judaism himself. How on earth was he even allowed to participate in ANY conversation involving accountability for Israel's policies and actions?
Why do we continue to tolerate only Jewish voices at the table when the self-styled "Jewish homeland" is repeatedly engaged in what an array of established, reputable human rights organizations have characterized as genocide? Did we permit members of the Nazi party to occupy every seat at the table in the 1930s and 1940s, and allow them drive the conversation regarding their own actions during WWII?
It's insanity. We are living during a time when the credibility of the U.S. is being cleaved away at an unprecedented rate, and the best we can do is double down with so many individuals possessed of outrageous conflicts of interest driving our national conversation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Columbia protesters are not seeking peace and advocating violence
"In the face of violence from the oppressor equipped with the most lethal military force on the planet," they wrote this week, "where you've exhausted all peaceful means of resolution, violence is the only path forward."
This is a USA Today article
Pro-Palestinian Columbia University group calls for armed resistance: 'violence is the only path'
By Savannah Kuchar,
It's fascinating to see young progressives align with Islamic extremist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Columbia students are embracing misogyny and homophobia and intolerance and ethnic hatred. I never thought this is where the left ends up. It's very clarifying.
Jews thought they could count on unwavering support from Americans but college students have seen that Israel is drunk on power, gives a green light to illegal settlements, and is relentlessly murdering Palestinian civilians, including thousands of children. If you do not realize how this has permanently soured younger educated Americans on Israel, you are deceiving yourself. Zionism was once viewed as noble; now it is completely seen as toxic. This is not going to change, so American Jews will have a choice to make as to whether they wish to be accepted in mainstream American society or despised just as much as the child-killing Israelis. Sorry if that seems unfair but that’s the new reality. No pontificating by right-wing pundits trying to turn Jews into Trump supporters by pandering to Israel is going to change it.
Do not presume to speak for young Americans. You are not messiah.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Columbia protesters are not seeking peace and advocating violence
"In the face of violence from the oppressor equipped with the most lethal military force on the planet," they wrote this week, "where you've exhausted all peaceful means of resolution, violence is the only path forward."
This is a USA Today article
Pro-Palestinian Columbia University group calls for armed resistance: 'violence is the only path'
By Savannah Kuchar,
It's fascinating to see young progressives align with Islamic extremist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Columbia students are embracing misogyny and homophobia and intolerance and ethnic hatred. I never thought this is where the left ends up. It's very clarifying.
Jews thought they could count on unwavering support from Americans but college students have seen that Israel is drunk on power, gives a green light to illegal settlements, and is relentlessly murdering Palestinian civilians, including thousands of children. If you do not realize how this has permanently soured younger educated Americans on Israel, you are deceiving yourself. Zionism was once viewed as noble; now it is completely seen as toxic. This is not going to change, so American Jews will have a choice to make as to whether they wish to be accepted in mainstream American society or despised just as much as the child-killing Israelis. Sorry if that seems unfair but that’s the new reality. No pontificating by right-wing pundits trying to turn Jews into Trump supporters by pandering to Israel is going to change it.
Do not presume to speak for young Americans. You are not messiah.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Columbia protesters are not seeking peace and advocating violence
"In the face of violence from the oppressor equipped with the most lethal military force on the planet," they wrote this week, "where you've exhausted all peaceful means of resolution, violence is the only path forward."
This is a USA Today article
Pro-Palestinian Columbia University group calls for armed resistance: 'violence is the only path'
By Savannah Kuchar,
It's fascinating to see young progressives align with Islamic extremist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Columbia students are embracing misogyny and homophobia and intolerance and ethnic hatred. I never thought this is where the left ends up. It's very clarifying.
Jews thought they could count on unwavering support from Americans but college students have seen that Israel is drunk on power, gives a green light to illegal settlements, and is relentlessly murdering Palestinian civilians, including thousands of children. If you do not realize how this has permanently soured younger educated Americans on Israel, you are deceiving yourself. Zionism was once viewed as noble; now it is completely seen as toxic. This is not going to change, so American Jews will have a choice to make as to whether they wish to be accepted in mainstream American society or despised just as much as the child-killing Israelis. Sorry if that seems unfair but that’s the new reality. No pontificating by right-wing pundits trying to turn Jews into Trump supporters by pandering to Israel is going to change it.
Anonymous wrote:Days after news broke of the earthquake in Iran's Semnan province, speculation has continued on social media that the tremors were caused by Tehran's first nuclear test.
At 10:45 pm on Saturday, the University of Tehran's seismography centre announced that a 4.4-magnitude earthquake had shaken the city of Aradan in Iran's Semnan province, with tremors also felt in parts of eastern Tehran.
The epicentre of the earthquake, which occurred 12km below ground, were recorded as 35.42° north and 52.78° east.
Hours after the news broke, social media users began speculating that the Tehran regime had attempted to conduct its first underground nuclear test, presumably as a deterrent measure against Israeli attacks on its territory.
These speculations came as Islamic Republic officials and Revolutionary Guard commanders repeatedly threaten that if economic, political and military pressures on the country intensify, Tehran will alter its military defence doctrine — a change that would require amending the Iranian leader's fatwa on the illegality of nuclear weapons.
https://www.euronews.com/2024/10/09/social-media-abuzz-with-claims-of-irans-secret-nuclear-test-after-44-magnitude-earthquake
Have no hear much about this in US media.
Days after news broke of the earthquake in Iran's Semnan province, speculation has continued on social media that the tremors were caused by Tehran's first nuclear test.
At 10:45 pm on Saturday, the University of Tehran's seismography centre announced that a 4.4-magnitude earthquake had shaken the city of Aradan in Iran's Semnan province, with tremors also felt in parts of eastern Tehran.
The epicentre of the earthquake, which occurred 12km below ground, were recorded as 35.42° north and 52.78° east.
Hours after the news broke, social media users began speculating that the Tehran regime had attempted to conduct its first underground nuclear test, presumably as a deterrent measure against Israeli attacks on its territory.
These speculations came as Islamic Republic officials and Revolutionary Guard commanders repeatedly threaten that if economic, political and military pressures on the country intensify, Tehran will alter its military defence doctrine — a change that would require amending the Iranian leader's fatwa on the illegality of nuclear weapons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Columbia protesters are not seeking peace and advocating violence
"In the face of violence from the oppressor equipped with the most lethal military force on the planet," they wrote this week, "where you've exhausted all peaceful means of resolution, violence is the only path forward."
This is a USA Today article
Pro-Palestinian Columbia University group calls for armed resistance: 'violence is the only path'
By Savannah Kuchar,
It's fascinating to see young progressives align with Islamic extremist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Columbia students are embracing misogyny and homophobia and intolerance and ethnic hatred. I never thought this is where the left ends up. It's very clarifying.