Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.

There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in

It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.

ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.

In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim

Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.

ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS

The doctor had a whistle, not a trauma kit. There was nothing they could do.

They didn’t block EMS, they had them walk into the scene. They did walk in. Sometimes EMS has to walk a ways.

He got what he asked for.

Anonymous wrote:ICE detains 5-year-old in Minnesota as JD Vance set to visit
https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/peopleandplaces/ice-detains-5-year-old-in-minnesota-as-jd-vance-set-to-visit/vi-AA1UKlA3?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=6972510928e8488eb894090740a158c4&ei=18
Federal agents detained a 5-year-old boy, along with his father, as he was arriving home on Wednesday

This hoax rates up there with the hoax in Chicago a few years back - you know, Ju$$ie.

ICE did NOT target a child. The child was ABANDONED.

On January 20, ICE conducted a targeted operation to arrest Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias an illegal alien from Ecuador who was RELEASED into the U.S. by the Biden administration.

As agents approached the driver Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, fled on foot—abandoning his child. For the child’s safety, one of our ICE officers remained with the child while the other officers apprehended Conejo Arias.

Parents are asked if they want to be removed with their children, or ICE will place the children with a safe person the parent designates. This is consistent with past administration’s immigration enforcement. Parents can take control of their departure and receive a free flight and $2,600 with the CBP Home app. By using the CBP Home app illegal aliens reserve the chance to come back the right legal way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.

There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in

It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.

ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.

In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim

Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.

ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

The third shot killed her. THIRD! He’ll be tried for murder. Bring back public hangings.

Explain how you get around Alito's 9-0 decision in Plumhoff.

Here's a reminder:

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”

9-0. Including RBG, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Take it up with them.

A threat to public safety is not the same as a threat to the officer. The argument in this case is that he was shooting to protect HIMSELF, not anyone else. The case you cited is irrelevant.

A person who turned her vehicle towards the officer and accelerated to flee the scene, IS a threat to the public.

Who are you talking about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

The third shot killed her. THIRD! He’ll be tried for murder. Bring back public hangings.

Explain how you get around Alito's 9-0 decision in Plumhoff.

Here's a reminder:

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”

9-0. Including RBG, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Take it up with them.

A threat to public safety is not the same as a threat to the officer. The argument in this case is that he was shooting to protect HIMSELF, not anyone else. The case you cited is irrelevant.

A person who turned her vehicle towards the officer and accelerated to flee the scene, IS a threat to the public.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.

There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in

It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.

ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.

In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim

Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.

Anonymous wrote:Emmer: "The people you're seeing in these videos, the vast majority of them I do not believe are from Minnesota. These are organized chaos agents, paid agitators. The vast majority of Minnesotans that are talking to me appreciate that law enforcement has arrived, and they are happy they're there."


I am old enough to remember when republicans celebrated an underage shooter who crossed state lines because reasons.

That guy was defending against the agitators.

Ironically, stepped-up ICE enforcement may be one of the more pro-worker policies in recent years: cracking down on illegal immigration could raise wages for hardworking Americans. It’s basic supply and demand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.

There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in

It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.

ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.

In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim

Anonymous wrote:Geez, I can't figure out why people are pissed at ICE:

I thought this one couldn't get any worse. ICE is not just evil, it's totally incompetent.

"WHEN ICE AGENTS DETAINED U.S. citizen ChongLy Thao in Minneapolis this weekend—breaking down his door and escorting him half-naked into the snow—administration officials claimed they’d been looking for a pair of sex-criminal migrants at the address. DHS plastered images of the two men they were hunting across social media with dire warnings that they remained “at large,” imploring the public to call in tips.

But there was one place they apparently hadn’t bothered to look: the Minnesota prison system. That’s where Lue Moua, one of DHS’s purported targets, has been since a 2024 conviction on charges including felony kidnapping.

This information wasn’t exactly secret. Moua’s name, face, and criminal record are easy to find in a public database of state criminal records.1 Minnesota Department of Corrections Communications Director Shannon Loehrke confirmed to The Bulwark Thursday that the Moua in their custody is the same individual DHS is seeking. Moreover, Loehrke added, Moua is already under an ICE detainer—meaning ICE is already aware he is there and has requested he be placed into their custody upon his release from state prison, which is currently scheduled for early 2027."

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/target-of-botched-ice-raid-in-viral-chongly-thao-minnesota-criminal-deportation

Not just paid paid chaos agents, but chaos agents who are funded by the US taxpayers, aka ICE.

Anonymous wrote:Emmer: "The people you're seeing in these videos, the vast majority of them I do not believe are from Minnesota. These are organized chaos agents, paid agitators. The vast majority of Minnesotans that are talking to me appreciate that law enforcement has arrived, and they are happy they're there."


I am old enough to remember when republicans celebrated an underage shooter who crossed state lines because reasons.

We’ve moved on now to paid chaos agents and the silent majority. Must be working. Keep it up!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent. More to come, no doubt.

Which I’m sure will be met with another “no bill” and a very expensive lawsuit us taxpayers will be required to pay.

Are you saying that Minnesota is so corrupt that even the everyday citizens who serve on a Grand Jury will refuse to indict even though a clear crime was committed and is on video for the world to see????

At best, it was trespassing after they asked her to leave. I know, it’s hard for you to understand that you can’t just beat people to death and throw them in jail forever because they’re brown and liberal. Take some time to work through it.

Emmer: "The people you're seeing in these videos, the vast majority of them I do not believe are from Minnesota. These are organized chaos agents, paid agitators. The vast majority of Minnesotans that are talking to me appreciate that law enforcement has arrived, and they are happy they're there."


I am old enough to remember when republicans celebrated an underage shooter who crossed state lines because reasons.