Anonymous wrote:Fight about it on DCUM all you like, the fact remains that public health experts endorse the use of frequent rapid testing in schools, and APS is simply following that pretty uncomplicated and uncontroversial guidance. It would be more effective if APS would make it an opt-out rather than an opt-in program, but it’s still better than no testing at all.
Anonymous wrote:To be fair, it was not that easy to sign up. The forms asked for my kid’s student ID number, our insurance information and pics of the cards, our vaccination info and pics of the cards, and other stuff I can’t remember. There were at least three screens of permissions/waivers. And there was no confirmation at the end, so if you did something wrong, you wind up in non signed up limbo. I’m not sure if APS has simplified sign up but I’m sure some people just gave up when they didn’t have the student is or other info on hand. I did that but then came back later.
Anonymous wrote:Fight about it on DCUM all you like, the fact remains that public health experts endorse the use of frequent rapid testing in schools, and APS is simply following that pretty uncomplicated and uncontroversial guidance. It would be more effective if APS would make it an opt-out rather than an opt-in program, but it’s still better than no testing at all.
Anonymous wrote:Again, should I follow the guidance of a random stranger on the internet or public health experts, who strongly advocate for frequent rapid testing in school settings? I haven’t met a single person in real life who opposed weekly testing. Some people didn’t sign up, but not because they had some massive overall objection to testing. For most it was questions about timing and how to fill out the questionnaire (which asks for more information than is actually required if you’re not symptomatic and haven’t had a known exposure). I can’t fathom the agenda motivating efforts to decrease rather than increase simple mitigation measures in our schools. I hope these are people from outside of our community.
And it's all just outside agitators too.Anonymous wrote:Let’s definitely ignore public health recommendations and not test kids because some guy on the internet has a kid who had a mild case of covid so the rest of us should just let our unvaccinated kids have a modern day version of a chickenpox party and get it over with🤷♀️ Sounds smart.
Anonymous wrote:But as an American shouldn’t my children and I be allowed to kill other people as a matter of carelessness and selfishness? I was brought up believing this so I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:I’m glad APS is taking basic mitigation steps. Vaccinations, masks, and regular testing all help. Anyone trying to fight against preventing spread in our schools might as well be advocating for a return to full time virtual learning. It is clear there are voices in the mix that are from outside of Arlington or are unaffiliated with our schools. Parents, especially of kids not eligible for the vaccine, see you for what you are. Not going to influence anybody around here.
Anonymous wrote:I’m glad getting covid was good for your family. I’m going to take a hard pass on just letting that happen to my kid, though. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:This is about everybody, not just our individual families. It's about the kid who is asymptomatic but got it from his asymptomatic brother and who spreads it to a classmate who takes it home to her mom who is immunocompromised because she is undergoing chemo for cancer, or to her granddad who was vaccinated but has a severe breakthrough infection that lands him in the hospital. Kids are largely asymptomatic and unlikely to get seriously sick thank god, but others are not so lucky. Over 650,000 deaths is a horrible reality, it is not fear mongering to ask everyone to take one small free step to try to prevent the spread.