Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
She is a Sidwell lifer. $40Kx 12!
how much did you pay for your public school tuition?
Yes, public school parent, that support is what you pay for. Not guaranteed admission. But at the very least, accuracy in grade reporting, timely submission of materials. and fair treatment of the child wrt recs. That the parents where difficult and ignored the school’s advice seemed to make things worse for the student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It could be argued and was. And it was rejected TWICE by the courts, so hey, let's take it to SCOTUS so it can get rejected a 3rd time.
Not even an ounce of merit to the case? Sidwell 100% correct?
No, but two courts ruled against the plaintiff and forced them to cover court costs and legal fees. That is pretty determinative, isn't it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
She is a Sidwell lifer. $40Kx 12!
how much did you pay for your public school tuition?
Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It could be argued and was. And it was rejected TWICE by the courts, so hey, let's take it to SCOTUS so it can get rejected a 3rd time.
Not even an ounce of merit to the case? Sidwell 100% correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
She is a Sidwell lifer. $40Kx 12!
how much did you pay for your public school tuition?
Anonymous wrote:The entitlement is appalling. As a public school parent, I wonder if I too could sue my child’s school for big bucks for failing to “support” their college applications? This just betrays this family’s (and many families’) belief that 12 years of tuition buys you admission to a selective college. She didn’t even apply to any safeties. Sorry, that’s not how the wider world works.
Anonymous wrote:It could be argued and was. And it was rejected TWICE by the courts, so hey, let's take it to SCOTUS so it can get rejected a 3rd time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All these folks sounding so indignant about how the family reacted would probably work the system if their kid were shut out.
Most parents would have accepted school advice not to have their kid apply to all Ivys and reach schools like Duke. Stupid and entitled doesn’t make it the school’s fault. And it sure as hell doesn’t amount to a federal civil rights case!
+1 Seems like the parents were idiots to sign off on a slate of highly selective schools and then were shocked when their kid didn't get in.
She applied on her own after a year and got in. Ooops! She clearly is Ivy material. She is now an Ivy graduate.
Because college addmission becomes very competitive, only a small fraction of QUANTIFIED candidates can be admitted to the top universities. The selection process is more random and no student, even though s/he is quantified, is guaranteed except those with extraordinary academic profiles, including national level awards like math/physics/chemistry olympiads, debating, Intel etc. NMSF is definitely not good enough. Also, National Achievement semi finalist is not NMSF and the cutoff of NASF is lower than NMSF. The whole debate is not about if the girl was quantified for ivies but if her profile makes her admission guaranteed. Apparently her parents thought so and thus blamed SIdwell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All these folks sounding so indignant about how the family reacted would probably work the system if their kid were shut out.
Most parents would have accepted school advice not to have their kid apply to all Ivys and reach schools like Duke. Stupid and entitled doesn’t make it the school’s fault. And it sure as hell doesn’t amount to a federal civil rights case!
+1 Seems like the parents were idiots to sign off on a slate of highly selective schools and then were shocked when their kid didn't get in.
She applied on her own after a year and got in. Ooops! She clearly is Ivy material. She is now an Ivy graduate.
Anonymous wrote:If URM affirmative action didn’t exist the girl wouldn’t even have been in the conversation for the colleges she applied to. And even then, it was a real stretch at nearly all of them.