Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are advocating for all S A schools at 50? Tanking Henry, Oakridge, and HB and just letting N A perpetuate this stupid divide in smallest wealthiest county? Are you even from S A because you sound like a N North Arlington resident that thinks neceau they lay more taxes they should get better treatment.
I'm in Nauck and my goals are to suggest improvements that stand a chance of happening. I've no interest in "tanking" Oakridge or Fleet, but it's pretty clear to me that without purposely keeping the AH currently zoned to those schools this this fall, they will both have farms rates under 20 percent within a couple years if it gets shoved off onto Drew. I'm not interested in turning those schools into "north" Arlington schools at the cost of creating another barcroft, carlin springs, or Randolph at Drew.
DP- that’s fine, but you can’t just be concerned about Drew. We need to be looking at creating change at Barcroft, Randolph, and Carlin Springs as well. We can’t all just retreat to our corners and protect “what’s ours”.
I'll skip being offended by your comment and point out that bussing Barcroft apt students to 4 or 5 different elementaries is a nonstarter and probably the only way to meaningfully bring down the farms rate at Randolph. I'm sorry I don't have a better suggestion but I can't say progresss everywhere or progresss nowhere. I'm open to suggestions about how to better balance the other schools. Drew will be solidly title i in any scenario I can imagine, so im not trying advocate for it at the expense of neighboring schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are advocating for all S A schools at 50? Tanking Henry, Oakridge, and HB and just letting N A perpetuate this stupid divide in smallest wealthiest county? Are you even from S A because you sound like a N North Arlington resident that thinks neceau they lay more taxes they should get better treatment.
I'm in Nauck and my goals are to suggest improvements that stand a chance of happening. I've no interest in "tanking" Oakridge or Fleet, but it's pretty clear to me that without purposely keeping the AH currently zoned to those schools this this fall, they will both have farms rates under 20 percent within a couple years if it gets shoved off onto Drew. I'm not interested in turning those schools into "north" Arlington schools at the cost of creating another barcroft, carlin springs, or Randolph at Drew.
DP- that’s fine, but you can’t just be concerned about Drew. We need to be looking at creating change at Barcroft, Randolph, and Carlin Springs as well. We can’t all just retreat to our corners and protect “what’s ours”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are advocating for all S A schools at 50? Tanking Henry, Oakridge, and HB and just letting N A perpetuate this stupid divide in smallest wealthiest county? Are you even from S A because you sound like a N North Arlington resident that thinks neceau they lay more taxes they should get better treatment.
I'm in Nauck and my goals are to suggest improvements that stand a chance of happening. I've no interest in "tanking" Oakridge or Fleet, but it's pretty clear to me that without purposely keeping the AH currently zoned to those schools this this fall, they will both have farms rates under 20 percent within a couple years if it gets shoved off onto Drew. I'm not interested in turning those schools into "north" Arlington schools at the cost of creating another barcroft, carlin springs, or Randolph at Drew.
Anonymous wrote:So you are advocating for all S A schools at 50? Tanking Henry, Oakridge, and HB and just letting N A perpetuate this stupid divide in smallest wealthiest county? Are you even from S A because you sound like a N North Arlington resident that thinks neceau they lay more taxes they should get better treatment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So how do most poster feel about this?
Do most agree that we should push the point of no school being over 50% FR/L?
Do posters feel its reasonable?
Yes, I support the policy of no school over 50%. I do NOT support making every school in south arlington 50% in order to make that happen. I do NOT support making 35% schools 50% in order to make that happen.
If a school is already 47%, for example, then fine - make it 50% if it means a 60-80% comes down to 50%, AND you make sure that 50% doesn't somehow creep up to 51, 52, 53, then suddenly 60.
Anonymous wrote:So you are advocating for all S A schools at 50? Tanking Henry, Oakridge, and HB and just letting N A perpetuate this stupid divide in smallest wealthiest county? Are you even from S A because you sound like a N North Arlington resident that thinks neceau they lay more taxes they should get better treatment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes I think if zones across the county are drawn east west and around walk zone then done in one direction east you could really mix it up. Draw McKinley into BarcroftBarrett and tip of Carlin Springs. Ashlawn into to Barcroft. Make Barcroft option. Drew takes some from Abingdon and all the way down and around to Arlington Ridge. The Board could go the right thing. I am not sure they will... of course Discivery, Tuckahoe, Reed, Jamestown are really hard to deal with based on geography unless they make Reed an option school.
I'm in SA and really have no desire to make a bunch of NA schools with farms rates less than 5 or 10 percent participate. Those schools have residents with the time and resources to scuttle the whole thing over something minor.
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think if zones across the county are drawn east west and around walk zone then done in one direction east you could really mix it up. Draw McKinley into BarcroftBarrett and tip of Carlin Springs. Ashlawn into to Barcroft. Make Barcroft option. Drew takes some from Abingdon and all the way down and around to Arlington Ridge. The Board could go the right thing. I am not sure they will... of course Discivery, Tuckahoe, Reed, Jamestown are really hard to deal with based on geography unless they make Reed an option school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So how do most poster feel about this?
Do most agree that we should push the point of no school being over 50% FR/L?
Do posters feel its reasonable?
... crickets ...
See? N/S, we really are all the same.
See what? The question was directed at north arlington, asking their willingness to help. South Arlington as a whole already is 50%. That's the Wakefield rate. Sa would have to draw the strangest elementary districts imgibavle to get 50% at each school. The answer from NA is no. "No we won't budge a bit." wanting a neighborhood elementary that is 50% poor instead of 80% percent poor is not equivalent to the classism that NA perpetuates in school and AH policy. You feel bad about being selfish conservatives so you call other people that name. Nope. Doesn't stick.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So how do most poster feel about this?
Do most agree that we should push the point of no school being over 50% FR/L?
Do posters feel its reasonable?
... crickets ...
See? N/S, we really are all the same.
See what? The question was directed at north arlington, asking their willingness to help. South Arlington as a whole already is 50%. That's the Wakefield rate. Sa would have to draw the strangest elementary districts imgibavle to get 50% at each school. The answer from NA is no. "No we won't budge a bit." wanting a neighborhood elementary that is 50% poor instead of 80% percent poor is not equivalent to the classism that NA perpetuates in school and AH policy. You feel bad about being selfish conservatives so you call other people that name. Nope. Doesn't stick.
Y’all pretty much told North Arlington to go eff themselves earlier in this discussion, I’m not sure they’re reading anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So how do most poster feel about this?
Do most agree that we should push the point of no school being over 50% FR/L?
Do posters feel its reasonable?
... crickets ...
See? N/S, we really are all the same.
See what? The question was directed at north arlington, asking their willingness to help. South Arlington as a whole already is 50%. That's the Wakefield rate. Sa would have to draw the strangest elementary districts imgibavle to get 50% at each school. The answer from NA is no. "No we won't budge a bit." wanting a neighborhood elementary that is 50% poor instead of 80% percent poor is not equivalent to the classism that NA perpetuates in school and AH policy. You feel bad about being selfish conservatives so you call other people that name. Nope. Doesn't stick.