Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some emotionally stunted princess brought her white purse dog into Trader Joe's (Old Town) and said it was a "service animal."

Girl everyone knows you're lying.

Dog owners that claim that their dogs are Service Animals should have to provide proof, or should be wearing an official badge of some sort. A disabled person has to display an official disabled tag in their vehicle to park in a disabled parking spot, so I don't see why this couldn't be done for dog owners too. It would certainly help solve the issue of people taking their "fur babies" into food and pharmacy stores.

No official badge, then no dog in the store, and a fine for people who are caught cheating the system if caught, just like they do for people who illegally park in disabled parking spots.

This woman had no badges, and the small fluffy dog was hanging out in a sling across her body. I normally wouldn't say anything, but JFC it's a grocery store and she's leaning over the open produce with her dog. I said: "you really shouldn't bring your dog to the grocery store" - she responded "it's a service animal."

I hate entitled brats like this who make it harder for people with legitimate medical needs for service animals. This princess just wanted to bring her doggy with her because it was 1) convenient, or 2) she's seeking attention.

I know I'm going off topic, but I hate those slings that people carry their dogs in. I can't believe that all dogs like to be carried around in them either.

These are the people that are "childfree" and hate human children but want to get dogs and treat them like children. The existence of doggy slings and doggy strollers is emblematic of this type of mental illness.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some emotionally stunted princess brought her white purse dog into Trader Joe's (Old Town) and said it was a "service animal."

Girl everyone knows you're lying.

Dog owners that claim that their dogs are Service Animals should have to provide proof, or should be wearing an official badge of some sort. A disabled person has to display an official disabled tag in their vehicle to park in a disabled parking spot, so I don't see why this couldn't be done for dog owners too. It would certainly help solve the issue of people taking their "fur babies" into food and pharmacy stores.

No official badge, then no dog in the store, and a fine for people who are caught cheating the system if caught, just like they do for people who illegally park in disabled parking spots.

This woman had no badges, and the small fluffy dog was hanging out in a sling across her body. I normally wouldn't say anything, but JFC it's a grocery store and she's leaning over the open produce with her dog. I said: "you really shouldn't bring your dog to the grocery store" - she responded "it's a service animal."

I hate entitled brats like this who make it harder for people with legitimate medical needs for service animals. This princess just wanted to bring her doggy with her because it was 1) convenient, or 2) she's seeking attention.

I know I'm going off topic, but I hate those slings that people carry their dogs in. I can't believe that all dogs like to be carried around in them either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some emotionally stunted princess brought her white purse dog into Trader Joe's (Old Town) and said it was a "service animal."

Girl everyone knows you're lying.

Dog owners that claim that their dogs are Service Animals should have to provide proof, or should be wearing an official badge of some sort. A disabled person has to display an official disabled tag in their vehicle to park in a disabled parking spot, so I don't see why this couldn't be done for dog owners too. It would certainly help solve the issue of people taking their "fur babies" into food and pharmacy stores.

No official badge, then no dog in the store, and a fine for people who are caught cheating the system if caught, just like they do for people who illegally park in disabled parking spots.

This woman had no badges, and the small fluffy dog was hanging out in a sling across her body. I normally wouldn't say anything, but JFC it's a grocery store and she's leaning over the open produce with her dog. I said: "you really shouldn't bring your dog to the grocery store" - she responded "it's a service animal."

I hate entitled brats like this who make it harder for people with legitimate medical needs for service animals. This princess just wanted to bring her doggy with her because it was 1) convenient, or 2) she's seeking attention.

Anonymous wrote:Some emotionally stunted princess brought her white purse dog into Trader Joe's (Old Town) and said it was a "service animal."

Girl everyone knows you're lying.

Dog owners that claim that their dogs are Service Animals should have to provide proof, or should be wearing an official badge of some sort. A disabled person has to display an official disabled tag in their vehicle to park in a disabled parking spot, so I don't see why this couldn't be done for dog owners too. It would certainly help solve the issue of people taking their "fur babies" into food and pharmacy stores.

No official badge, then no dog in the store, and a fine for people who are caught cheating the system if caught, just like they do for people who illegally park in disabled parking spots.

Some emotionally stunted princess brought her white purse dog into Trader Joe's (Old Town) and said it was a "service animal."

Girl everyone knows you're lying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pets do NOT belong in stores, grocery or otherwise. In the past, pet-owners had no problem whatsoever with this. I don't know why these days there is the sudden compulsion to bring them everywhere. They are not allowed in grocery stores, convenience stores including CVS, etc., so just have a little respect. Some of us are seriously afraid of and seriously allergic to dogs. If we want to see them, they should be outside, not in places where we are conducting business. Need I mention the dozens of people, including little children, whom I know to have been bitten and / or scratched by dogs? I know somebody who lost a finger to his neighbors' dog simply because they chose to bring the dog into a shopping mall where it was NOT allowed. This is not the only incident. Leave them at home or tied up outside!

The same reason that people are obsessed with constantly posting every day on social media - the snowflakes need their attention fix.

And the size of your dog doesn't matter. Unless it is a highly trained service animal for a REAL medical need, leave it at home, big or small.

That's exactly true! Those of us complaining about dogs in places of business have valid reasons for not wanting them there. The entitled pet owners have no valid reasons for needing them there.

Anonymous wrote:Pets do NOT belong in stores, grocery or otherwise. In the past, pet-owners had no problem whatsoever with this. I don't know why these days there is the sudden compulsion to bring them everywhere. They are not allowed in grocery stores, convenience stores including CVS, etc., so just have a little respect. Some of us are seriously afraid of and seriously allergic to dogs. If we want to see them, they should be outside, not in places where we are conducting business. Need I mention the dozens of people, including little children, whom I know to have been bitten and / or scratched by dogs? I know somebody who lost a finger to his neighbors' dog simply because they chose to bring the dog into a shopping mall where it was NOT allowed. This is not the only incident. Leave them at home or tied up outside!

The same reason that people are obsessed with constantly posting every day on social media - the snowflakes need their attention fix.

And the size of your dog doesn't matter. Unless it is a highly trained service animal for a REAL medical need, leave it at home, big or small.

OMG, I know a victim like that as well. The little boy was 10 years old and lost part of a finger to a dog that, unprovoked, just turned his head and bit the little boy out of nowhere in a shopping center. What is wrong with people, thinking they are entitled to bring their pets, which are obviously not service animals, everywhere?

Pets do NOT belong in stores, grocery or otherwise. In the past, pet-owners had no problem whatsoever with this. I don't know why these days there is the sudden compulsion to bring them everywhere. They are not allowed in grocery stores, convenience stores including CVS, etc., so just have a little respect. Some of us are seriously afraid of and seriously allergic to dogs. If we want to see them, they should be outside, not in places where we are conducting business. Need I mention the dozens of people, including little children, whom I know to have been bitten and / or scratched by dogs? I know somebody who lost a finger to his neighbors' dog simply because they chose to bring the dog into a shopping mall where it was NOT allowed. This is not the only incident. Leave them at home or tied up outside!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the grocery store yesterday a young lady was carrying her puppy around as if she had just given birth. I heard her talking to the cashier about it and apparently it was German Shepherd puppy. As much as I like this breed of dog, I still think it should be left at home and shame on the cashier for admiring the puppy rather than telling the owner that it's not allowed in the store as there is clearly a no dogs allowed sign on the entrance door.

People like this who bring their pets into stores always strike me as really sad. They're like the sad old lady who pushes a doll in a stroller in the park.

Yep, agreed. I feel like it’s usually lonely women using dogs as a stand in for children (while insisting they don’t want any!) or a boyfriend. It’s so, so sad. I think our society has serious problems.

Welp, I think lonely men taking a gun into a public space and killing a bunch of people is far more sad and serious a societal problem than women who like to carry their pets around. One leads to death and devastation, the other leads to...you kvetching?

Why you've brought guns into this I don't know?

Because lonely, pet-toting women are not the social scourge towards which you should be directing your ire.

Doesn't mean that we should keep quiet about something just because there are other issues going on in the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the grocery store yesterday a young lady was carrying her puppy around as if she had just given birth. I heard her talking to the cashier about it and apparently it was German Shepherd puppy. As much as I like this breed of dog, I still think it should be left at home and shame on the cashier for admiring the puppy rather than telling the owner that it's not allowed in the store as there is clearly a no dogs allowed sign on the entrance door.

People like this who bring their pets into stores always strike me as really sad. They're like the sad old lady who pushes a doll in a stroller in the park.

Yep, agreed. I feel like it’s usually lonely women using dogs as a stand in for children (while insisting they don’t want any!) or a boyfriend. It’s so, so sad. I think our society has serious problems.

Welp, I think lonely men taking a gun into a public space and killing a bunch of people is far more sad and serious a societal problem than women who like to carry their pets around. One leads to death and devastation, the other leads to...you kvetching?

Why you've brought guns into this I don't know?

Because lonely, pet-toting women are not the social scourge towards which you should be directing your ire.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I might bring my dog because I need to drop off or pick up a prescription for my sick child and I have to double task or the dog is not going to get walked that day. Then assholes like you will complain the dog barked. I really don't see how the mere presence of a dog affects your purchase of a bag of Cheetos.

So then leave your animal outside. Or in the car. If it's that important, your dog didn't need to come with you.

np. no, I'm not going to do that. I am normalizing bringing dogs into stores like this. you will get over it.

And when the dog lifts its leg and leaves it puddle in the store, what happens if someone slips in it? And, of course, it will fall to the person making minimum wage to clean up after the Most Entitled who insist on taking their 'friendly' dogs into stores.

This is ridiculous. You do realize that all over Europe dogs go into shops and restaurants and there are no problems with urination?

Last time I looked this was not “Europe” different country different rules.

In Europe there’s an overall attitude that you do what is best for the collective, while America is way more individualistic and you do what is best for you. So a European dog owner understands they clean up because it is best for everyone, while an American won’t feel bothered. Plus, there’s an attitude that store workers are beneath us, so it can be part of their job to clean up messes.

Yeah, right. I've never seen more dog shit on the streets than in Paris.

Anonymous wrote:Crazy dog people are the worst. The HORROR that some place decided they don't want you to bring their dog to their business. And the cat probably keeps field mice down, so is actually functional.

Lol dog people are nuts. I’m surrrreee the guy loading the mulch bags is so sad not to see the dogs anymore lol.

Crazy dog people are the worst. The HORROR that some place decided they don't want you to bring their dog to their business. And the cat probably keeps field mice down, so is actually functional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I might bring my dog because I need to drop off or pick up a prescription for my sick child and I have to double task or the dog is not going to get walked that day. Then assholes like you will complain the dog barked. I really don't see how the mere presence of a dog affects your purchase of a bag of Cheetos.

So then leave your animal outside. Or in the car. If it's that important, your dog didn't need to come with you.

np. no, I'm not going to do that. I am normalizing bringing dogs into stores like this. you will get over it.

And when the dog lifts its leg and leaves it puddle in the store, what happens if someone slips in it? And, of course, it will fall to the person making minimum wage to clean up after the Most Entitled who insist on taking their 'friendly' dogs into stores.

This is ridiculous. You do realize that all over Europe dogs go into shops and restaurants and there are no problems with urination?

Last time I looked this was not “Europe” different country different rules.

In Europe there’s an overall attitude that you do what is best for the collective, while America is way more individualistic and you do what is best for you. So a European dog owner understands they clean up because it is best for everyone, while an American won’t feel bothered. Plus, there’s an attitude that store workers are beneath us, so it can be part of their job to clean up messes.

Huh. I have definitely cleaned dog crap off of my child's shoes in many parts of Europe. Which part do you mean, PP?