Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 23:29     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has she vetoed the Tysons casino yet? No? I regret my vote for her more and more every single day.


Nobody was going to veto the Tyson’s casino, so how can you regret your vote on this issue.

Honestly, why do people give a shit about it? There is a casino like 10 miles away at National Harbor and teens are all gambling online anyway. You wouldn’t give a rat’s ass if Lansdowne Resort was turned into a casino.


"Nobody" was going to veto it? You must be joking. If Youngkin was still governor, he would. And what do you mean, why do we "give a shit about it"? Because we LIVE NEARBY, you moron.


Youngkin wasn’t going to be governor dipshit because of term limits…and Earles wouldn’t have vetoed it.

Live nearby? It’s Tyson’s…nobody lives nearby. Even if you did, you are fine with a casino that exists just around 10 miles away and couldn’t care less if one was built another 10 miles away.

So, I say again…who gives a shit if there is a casino in Tyson’s. They are everywhere now. What exactly is your concern about it…be specific…because I have read numerous people talking about protecting “the children”.

Guess what, the children are gambling online like crazy and nobody is doing anything about it.


One of the most moronic posts I've read in a long time. Are you familiar at all with Tysons and the area the casino was going to go in? I live two minutes away on Rt. 7. You're a complete idiot if you don't know there are neighborhoods there, not to mention apartment buildings.

Also, the comment about Youngkin vetoing it if he was still governor was a *hypothetical.* We're all well aware of term limits. And of course Earles would have vetoed it.

All of this is moot now that Spanberger FINALLY vetoed the casino - what took her so long? You must be so disappointed that you didn't get your casino.
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 22:18     Subject: Re:Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:Spanberger (is she Voldemort’s cousin? Definitely she’s a Slytherin) vetoed the bill because she wants the money that would gave been spent gambling going into her pockets via tax gimmicks and “gotcha!” fees.


Republicans are just pathologically incapable of admitting they were wrong about something, aren't they?
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 14:03     Subject: Re:Abigail Spanberger
Spanberger (is she Voldemort’s cousin? Definitely she’s a Slytherin) vetoed the bill because she wants the money that would gave been spent gambling going into her pockets via tax gimmicks and “gotcha!” fees.
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 13:26     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Eh, she knew moderates were maybe not on board with the gerrymandering and she is trying to restore some credibility.
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 12:56     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Maybe he didn't have to. Enough of us who supported Spanberger and POS Dave Marsden were disgusted by their voiced support of the casino.

She listened to the constituents of Northern Virginia
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 12:47     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hey dipshits...Spanberger vetoed the Tysons Casino bill.

Guess she is now your hero!


I love it. I'm sure MAGA will rush over here to tell us they support her now and that they were wrong. Right?


Let’s analyze why she did…..




I love this so much.

Let me tell you what is really happening. Louis Lucas in Portsmouth wants data centers to be taxed. Heavily.

Northern Virginia Dems don’t.

So here’s what happens. Louise gets the governor to kill the casino bill In Fairfax County. The tax revenue from the casino was already being spent in Fairfax proposed budgets. Lucas killed it.

Fairfax is facing a $131 million budget deficit next year - mostly because they have unionized their government work force

Louise took the money away. In a reverse suplex Hulk Hogan smack down.

Guess who’s about to be taxed. The data centers. It’s the only pot of money left. A deal will be struck to revenue share tax money with localities. The rest goes to projects Louise wants.

This is how the sausage is made.






already discussed on the casino thread. What I want to know is how Lucas got Spanberger to agree to the veto.
Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 12:17     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hey dipshits...Spanberger vetoed the Tysons Casino bill.

Guess she is now your hero!


I love it. I'm sure MAGA will rush over here to tell us they support her now and that they were wrong. Right?


Let’s analyze why she did…..




I love this so much.

Let me tell you what is really happening. Louis Lucas in Portsmouth wants data centers to be taxed. Heavily.

Northern Virginia Dems don’t.

So here’s what happens. Louise gets the governor to kill the casino bill In Fairfax County. The tax revenue from the casino was already being spent in Fairfax proposed budgets. Lucas killed it.

Fairfax is facing a $131 million budget deficit next year - mostly because they have unionized their government work force

Louise took the money away. In a reverse suplex Hulk Hogan smack down.

Guess who’s about to be taxed. The data centers. It’s the only pot of money left. A deal will be struck to revenue share tax money with localities. The rest goes to projects Louise wants.

This is how the sausage is made.




Anonymous
Post 04/10/2026 05:32     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Needs to veto some more bad legislation to reach broken clock status of being right twice in one day.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 19:25     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:A bunch more bills need to be vetoed as well.


Don't get your hopes up. Spanberger definitely thinks only federal law enforcement should be armed.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 19:22     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
A bunch more bills need to be vetoed as well.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 18:03     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a bit shocked. The casino people are persistent. Every time you think it is is final dead it rises up like a zombie.

If the next casino proposal includes a casino commission she may change her mind.


A casino commission would interfere with bribing the local politicians. No one wants that except the governor.


And, the next proposal will be after the redistricting vote.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 17:19     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:I am a bit shocked. The casino people are persistent. Every time you think it is is final dead it rises up like a zombie.

If the next casino proposal includes a casino commission she may change her mind.


A casino commission would interfere with bribing the local politicians. No one wants that except the governor.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 17:17     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:Hey dipshits...Spanberger vetoed the Tysons Casino bill.

Guess she is now your hero!


She rejected it for the reasons she said she would not support it. I am pleasantly surprised.

I expect Surovell to get busy with overriding the veto. That won't succeed.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 17:11     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
I am a bit shocked. The casino people are persistent. Every time you think it is is final dead it rises up like a zombie.

If the next casino proposal includes a casino commission she may change her mind.
Anonymous
Post 04/09/2026 16:50     Subject: Abigail Spanberger
Anonymous wrote:Hey dipshits...Spanberger vetoed the Tysons Casino bill.

Guess she is now your hero!


I love it. I'm sure MAGA will rush over here to tell us they support her now and that they were wrong. Right?