Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:51     Subject: Re:Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:WTF is going on? Trump has completely lost the plot! How can anyone defend this idiot? I think he wants to kill us all by making us go insane. What an absolute idiot. Anyone who thinks he is qualified to be president needs their head examined.


He's 100% going to destroy the US. Attacking a NATO country is totally and completely insane. The only way any of this makes sense is if he's taking orders from Putin. That or he's just completely insane.


+1. NATO has only been activated once since its formation-after 9/11 where its members supported the USA in its attack on Afghanistan. Hundreds of British soldiers died to support this US. Danish soldiers died too. And Trump/MAGA repays them by threatening to blow up NATO and take Greenland…


If they are deploying troops to Greenland to attack us, it's safe to say that NATO doesn't really exist at all.


NATO does exist. There is a certain “leader” that doesn’t respect the organization is fine with doing away with 75 years of partnership and security cooperation. I wonder who that would be?
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:43     Subject: Re:Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:WTF is going on? Trump has completely lost the plot! How can anyone defend this idiot? I think he wants to kill us all by making us go insane. What an absolute idiot. Anyone who thinks he is qualified to be president needs their head examined.


He's 100% going to destroy the US. Attacking a NATO country is totally and completely insane. The only way any of this makes sense is if he's taking orders from Putin. That or he's just completely insane.


+1. NATO has only been activated once since its formation-after 9/11 where its members supported the USA in its attack on Afghanistan. Hundreds of British soldiers died to support this US. Danish soldiers died too. And Trump/MAGA repays them by threatening to blow up NATO and take Greenland…


If they are deploying troops to Greenland to attack us, it's safe to say that NATO doesn't really exist at all.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:43     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:Senator and House Republicans going to Denmark.

Republicans vow to block Donald Trump from seizing Greenland by force https://share.google/qpYC31Bu6JqCiOG0n


Exactly how are they going to stop him.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:38     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Senator and House Republicans going to Denmark.

Republicans vow to block Donald Trump from seizing Greenland by force https://share.google/qpYC31Bu6JqCiOG0n
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:34     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Republicans will have to kill Uk, Norway, French, etc troops to take Greenland. Man what are you republicans doing?
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:16     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NEWS: Republican Congressman Don Bacon says that if Trump invades Greenland, there will be enough Republican support in the House to impeach him.


First of all, that’s too late. I’m sure it will be of great comfort to the Greenlanders and NATO members who died in the invasion.

Second of all, I’ll believe it when I see it. When the Ukraine scandal came out, Republicans were saying that if such a thing were true it would be grounds for impeachment, but when it turned out the accusations were true, they decided that impeachment wasn’t actually necessary, after all. When January 6 happened, Republican senators whose personal safety had been threatened were personally outraged and expressed that Trump should be held accountable, yet when the impeachment vote came up, they decided accountability wasn’t really necessary. Their continued inaction and deliberate denial of justice has brought us to this point. If they wouldn’t act after an attack on America and the imminent danger to themselves, I don’t expect them to attack after Greenland has been attacked and its citizens have been endangered. They’ll realize the danger has been done, how unfortunate, but impeachment won’t fix anything - oh, well. Not to mention, our country will be in a crisis facing worldwide condemnation, widespread sanctions, and possible military threat, and they won’t want to disrupt leadership in a time of crisis. I fear the ultimate outcome is more likely that Trump will end up declaring a state of emergency and declaring martial law on America than that Republican senators would actually grown a spine and convict him.


We'll see how this goes. Clearly there hasn't been a redline that's ever been relevant to Trump, but this one seems different.


DP. Just stop. It is all Republicans not Trump.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:13     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:What's the golf course/resort potential?


Not as much as the bribes he can get for selling mining rights. Maybe he’ll issue a new Trump coin to commemorate the victory.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:12     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:NEWS: Republican Congressman Don Bacon says that if Trump invades Greenland, there will be enough Republican support in the House to impeach him.

This Senate will never convict, so it doesn’t matter.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:09     Subject: Greendland - why not?

What's the golf course/resort potential?
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 12:01     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NEWS: Republican Congressman Don Bacon says that if Trump invades Greenland, there will be enough Republican support in the House to impeach him.


First of all, that’s too late. I’m sure it will be of great comfort to the Greenlanders and NATO members who died in the invasion.

Second of all, I’ll believe it when I see it. When the Ukraine scandal came out, Republicans were saying that if such a thing were true it would be grounds for impeachment, but when it turned out the accusations were true, they decided that impeachment wasn’t actually necessary, after all. When January 6 happened, Republican senators whose personal safety had been threatened were personally outraged and expressed that Trump should be held accountable, yet when the impeachment vote came up, they decided accountability wasn’t really necessary. Their continued inaction and deliberate denial of justice has brought us to this point. If they wouldn’t act after an attack on America and the imminent danger to themselves, I don’t expect them to attack after Greenland has been attacked and its citizens have been endangered. They’ll realize the danger has been done, how unfortunate, but impeachment won’t fix anything - oh, well. Not to mention, our country will be in a crisis facing worldwide condemnation, widespread sanctions, and possible military threat, and they won’t want to disrupt leadership in a time of crisis. I fear the ultimate outcome is more likely that Trump will end up declaring a state of emergency and declaring martial law on America than that Republican senators would actually grown a spine and convict him.


We'll see how this goes. Clearly there hasn't been a redline that's ever been relevant to Trump, but this one seems different.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 11:49     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:NEWS: Republican Congressman Don Bacon says that if Trump invades Greenland, there will be enough Republican support in the House to impeach him.


First of all, that’s too late. I’m sure it will be of great comfort to the Greenlanders and NATO members who died in the invasion.

Second of all, I’ll believe it when I see it. When the Ukraine scandal came out, Republicans were saying that if such a thing were true it would be grounds for impeachment, but when it turned out the accusations were true, they decided that impeachment wasn’t actually necessary, after all. When January 6 happened, Republican senators whose personal safety had been threatened were personally outraged and expressed that Trump should be held accountable, yet when the impeachment vote came up, they decided accountability wasn’t really necessary. Their continued inaction and deliberate denial of justice has brought us to this point. If they wouldn’t act after an attack on America and the imminent danger to themselves, I don’t expect them to attack after Greenland has been attacked and its citizens have been endangered. They’ll realize the danger has been done, how unfortunate, but impeachment won’t fix anything - oh, well. Not to mention, our country will be in a crisis facing worldwide condemnation, widespread sanctions, and possible military threat, and they won’t want to disrupt leadership in a time of crisis. I fear the ultimate outcome is more likely that Trump will end up declaring a state of emergency and declaring martial law on America than that Republican senators would actually grown a spine and convict him.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 10:47     Subject: Greendland - why not?

Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 10:41     Subject: Greendland - why not?

NEWS: Republican Congressman Don Bacon says that if Trump invades Greenland, there will be enough Republican support in the House to impeach him.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 09:47     Subject: Re:Greendland - why not?

Anonymous wrote:not about russia- its Netanyahu. the end of Nato spells the end of Turkish independance/defiance and he can bomb Turkey into submission.


Yep. Bibi and the Israelis are already pushing the weapons of mass destruction, nuclear weapons, funding hamas, etc.against Turkey.

For nearly two decades, Turkey has hosted Hamas leaders, pledged hundreds of millions in funding, and allowed front companies tied to the group to manage much of its $500 million in overseas assets. US sanctions have repeatedly targeted these networks, yet many still operate freely as Turkey refuses to join its US and European allies in designating Hamas a terrorist group.

https://jinsa.org/why-turkey-cannot-be-trusted-in-gaza/

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) revealed new intelligence pointing to a significant Hamas financial apparatus operating within Turkey under direct Iranian supervision. According to IDF Arabic spokesperson Colonel Avichay Adraee, the network has facilitated the movement of hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas’s leadership and operatives. The information was released on Sunday alongside captured documentation obtained during Israeli operations.

https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2025/12/idf-reveals-hamas-financial-network-operating-in-turkey.php

Erdogan’s Turkey poses an immediate strategic threat to Israel

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/erdogans-turkey-poses-an-immediate-strategic-threat-to-israel/

The eighth, most dangerous front: How Turkey went from ally to strategic threat - opinion
Bit by bit, a Turkish front is forming, more dangerous than Israel’s seven arenas since Oct. 7. Erdogan’s ideology and ambition require Israel to refocus on a higher strategic risk.

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-880969

The Pakistan-Turkey Axis: A New and Dangerous Threat to Israel

https://www.algemeiner.com/2025/12/18/the-pakistan-turkey-axis-a-new-and-dangerous-threat-to-israel/


Turkey is the new Iran
The threat is not just conventional: Turkey is accelerating its nuclear project on the Mediterranean coast, which is set to go operational this year. Its insistence on independent uranium enrichment would enable it to develop nuclear weapons

https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/turkey-is-the-new-iran/
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2026 06:24     Subject: Re:Greendland - why not?

not about russia- its Netanyahu. the end of Nato spells the end of Turkish independance/defiance and he can bomb Turkey into submission.