Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Federal law prohibits the use of taxpayer dollars to provide medical coverage to undocumented individuals. That's the law.
So the right wing tripe is just that.
I would rather illegals pay into the healthcare system instead of using services for free. More $$ into the system means lower rates for everyone.
They do pay in but get no services in return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Who are you people??? This is not going to happen???
Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Who are you people??? This is not going to happen???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't wait to watch OMB Director Voight to do his magic. We maybe able to cut the monthly deficit to zero or positive by November
You could get rid of every civilian federal employee outside of social security, Medicare/Medicaid, and the Treasury department to handle the debt and you world STILL have a deficit. You can't balance the budget without cutting Medicare/Medicaid/social security or by raising revenue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Who are you people??? This is not going to happen???
Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Anonymous wrote:Trump's OMB (Vought) and OPM are apparently gearing up to push a plan for federal agencies to RIF every federal employee who isn't excepted from shutdown furlough and who isn't explicitly covered by H.R.1 (which didn't fund most agencies, and which is why we are steamrolling toward a shutdown). What this means is that over 92% of federal employees will be fired if the shutdown lasts longer than 60 days.
Tell me, what would you think if a new CEO took over your own company and a few months in fired 92% of everyone there, with minimal regard to what the function of the fired people actually was? How do you think that company would survive? It wouldn't. You'd lose most of your technical expertise, organizational and institutional knowledge and history, relationships with customers and other organizations, everything would collapse and the company would implode. Anyone who thinks it would be a "good thing" is completely clueless about how things work.
Anonymous wrote:Nearly 100,000 federal workers have resigned this morning making it the largest resignation in history.
Thank you potus for being a good steward of fiscal discipline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are they including aca subsidies it has nothing to do with the shutdown it should only be topics related to the budget debate of the shutdown . Dems off target again risking their own people.
They need to address this before open enrollment begins on November 1. There's no other way to bring Republicans to the table.
Not really. They can open that debate up next week separately
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only 16 hours until the Schumer Shutdown. Yes its Schumers fault as he is preventing 7 democrat senators for voting for cloture on the CR
Polling says most people will be blaming the White House or congressional Republicans for this shutdown.
“Polling”
You still read that swill?
Oh, do you have any contrary evidence to offer? Otherwise all you’ve got are your feelings.
It’s seems you have forgotten how wrong the polling was in 2024 and 2016.
Polling used to be more accurate, now it’s just a coping mechanism.
Were the polls off by 17 points? That’s how much more people will blame Republicans, according to Morning Consult. Their presidential polling predicted a 2 point Harris victory, which was within the margin of error for the actual result of Trump 49.8%, Harris 48.3%. Doesn’t seem like this is even remotely comparable.
Again, if you have actual evidence to the contrary, please share it. But all I’m hearing from you are angry feelings. It’s nice that you want Republicans not to be blamed, but that won’t make it true.
Sadly the PP is right about polls. The billionaire funded media will blame Democrats. We’re not living in reality, it’s feels.
However, if Dems hold, they will earn good will from their voters.
I’m a Dem and think their demands are inadequate but I guess they are trying?🤷♀️🤷