Anonymous wrote:Calling 3 late goals ‘not a blowout’ is pure coping. If you spend the whole game pinned in your own half with two chances, those goals at the end aren’t luck — they’re the result of getting worn down. And let’s be real, saying you ‘out-muscled’ anyone while creating nothing going forward just makes it worse. A W is a W — but trying to spin it like you were in control is comedy.Anonymous wrote:3 goals in the last 13-15 mins of the game is not a blowout …you guys were quiet and quite frankly getting out muscled. A W is a W however. Cant wait to run it back.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Pretty even for 70% of it? Were you watching the same game? Check the veo stats Union dad. It was a blowout across the board. See you never.
sensible post spotted.Anonymous wrote:FVU has always been a humble team. Nothing special. a 3-0 loss to Arlington is not bad. 6-0 would be the norm. I would take the result as a good progress.
lmao… not really but i swear this age group is probably the most entertaining on here. 09s are moving into that territory and the GA threads are now heating up. ARL poster is just but hurt they were held scoreless most of the game when everyone thought it would be 12-0.Anonymous wrote:Okay I don’t follow all this, but apparently Arlington is out here doing God’s work on FVU 😂(just a mom here looking for drama)
Anonymous wrote:Two shots on goal… same story as last year, and the year before. With no real attack or tactics, it’s no wonder they still can’t score. At some point the girls will realize it’s the coaching holding them back — and that’s when more of them start leaving FVU.Anonymous wrote:fvu had 2 weak SOGs… they do count however. Couldn’t get it going on the attack. It is what it is. You guys had some pretty goals one cross bar and the rest the goalies ate easily. On defense however If dominating the whole game is getting pushed/forced off the ball and kicking it out of bounds .. you got it bro!!! That didn’t look like control from the first half and part of the second. And it was quiet over there for a reason. Good game from all the girls. No need to recreate history however.Anonymous wrote:70% even? Come on… FVU didn’t even step into Arlington’s 18-yard box. Zero shots, while Arlington had chance after chance. The parents trying to call it a ‘close game’ just to make themselves feel better doesn’t change the fact that Arlington dominated the whole game. That’s how soccer works—if you’re in the other team’s half enough, eventually you put it away. Arlington didn’t need halftime magic—they just controlled the game start to finish. FVU needs to be worried about coaching, because talent alone isn’t winning games like that...Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Love this board… will be hitting refresh later as scores trickle in.
Calling 3 late goals ‘not a blowout’ is pure coping. If you spend the whole game pinned in your own half with two chances, those goals at the end aren’t luck — they’re the result of getting worn down. And let’s be real, saying you ‘out-muscled’ anyone while creating nothing going forward just makes it worse. A W is a W — but trying to spin it like you were in control is comedy.Anonymous wrote:3 goals in the last 13-15 mins of the game is not a blowout …you guys were quiet and quite frankly getting out muscled. A W is a W however. Cant wait to run it back.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Pretty even for 70% of it? Were you watching the same game? Check the veo stats Union dad. It was a blowout across the board. See you never.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:nope unless talking vdaAnonymous wrote:Any team on upset alert?
VDA 2011s…the most overrated team in Northern Virginia. Hahaha
Two shots on goal… same story as last year, and the year before. With no real attack or tactics, it’s no wonder they still can’t score. At some point the girls will realize it’s the coaching holding them back — and that’s when more of them start leaving FVU.Anonymous wrote:fvu had 2 weak SOGs… they do count however. Couldn’t get it going on the attack. It is what it is. You guys had some pretty goals one cross bar and the rest the goalies ate easily. On defense however If dominating the whole game is getting pushed/forced off the ball and kicking it out of bounds .. you got it bro!!! That didn’t look like control from the first half and part of the second. And it was quiet over there for a reason. Good game from all the girls. No need to recreate history however.Anonymous wrote:70% even? Come on… FVU didn’t even step into Arlington’s 18-yard box. Zero shots, while Arlington had chance after chance. The parents trying to call it a ‘close game’ just to make themselves feel better doesn’t change the fact that Arlington dominated the whole game. That’s how soccer works—if you’re in the other team’s half enough, eventually you put it away. Arlington didn’t need halftime magic—they just controlled the game start to finish. FVU needs to be worried about coaching, because talent alone isn’t winning games like that...Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Love this board… will be hitting refresh later as scores trickle in.
Anonymous wrote:3 goals in the last 13-15 mins of the game is not a blowout …you guys were quiet and quite frankly getting out muscled. A W is a W however. Cant wait to run it back.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Pretty even for 70% of it? Were you watching the same game? Check the veo stats Union dad. It was a blowout across the board. See you never.
And the defenders. Its ok to admit it.. as others say Pepperidge farm and VEO remembers.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:fvu had 2 weak SOGs… they do count however. Couldn’t get it going on the attack. It is what it is. You guys had some pretty goals one cross bar and the rest the goalies ate easily. On defense however If dominating the whole game is getting pushed/forced off the ball and kicking it out of bounds .. you got it bro!!! That didn’t look like control from the first half and part of the second. And it was quiet over there for a reason. Good game from all the girls. No need to recreate history however.Anonymous wrote:70% even? Come on… FVU didn’t even step into Arlington’s 18-yard box. Zero shots, while Arlington had chance after chance. The parents trying to call it a ‘close game’ just to make themselves feel better doesn’t change the fact that Arlington dominated the whole game. That’s how soccer works—if you’re in the other team’s half enough, eventually you put it away. Arlington didn’t need halftime magic—they just controlled the game start to finish. FVU needs to be worried about coaching, because talent alone isn’t winning games like that...Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Love this board… will be hitting refresh later as scores trickle in.
Ehhhh not really happened that way but whatever u want to believe is fine. Kudos to FVU keepers - they both had amazing saves and played great.
no… the hubbub is that what was expected (domination) wasn’t seen out there (mostly) until the end. FVU couldn’t go the distance but its not a knock at all. Defensively they hung on for a bit.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-0 ArlingtonAnonymous wrote:So what is the score FVU - Arl ?
Expected. So what is all the arguments are about? 70%, 50%. MA conference top 4 are RU, Arlington, NC Courage and Charlotte. The In that order.
Anonymous wrote:fvu had 2 weak SOGs… they do count however. Couldn’t get it going on the attack. It is what it is. You guys had some pretty goals one cross bar and the rest the goalies ate easily. On defense however If dominating the whole game is getting pushed/forced off the ball and kicking it out of bounds .. you got it bro!!! That didn’t look like control from the first half and part of the second. And it was quiet over there for a reason. Good game from all the girls. No need to recreate history however.Anonymous wrote:70% even? Come on… FVU didn’t even step into Arlington’s 18-yard box. Zero shots, while Arlington had chance after chance. The parents trying to call it a ‘close game’ just to make themselves feel better doesn’t change the fact that Arlington dominated the whole game. That’s how soccer works—if you’re in the other team’s half enough, eventually you put it away. Arlington didn’t need halftime magic—they just controlled the game start to finish. FVU needs to be worried about coaching, because talent alone isn’t winning games like that...Anonymous wrote:uhhh ok. Wasn’t hope. Was a good game between the coaches. Good adjustments on your team. But it was a pretty even game for 70% of it. Good on yall to eke it out at the end. And we didn’t play a lot of kickball out there. Until the end. It probably hurts to admit it but we hung in there until the end. Sorry not sorry.Anonymous wrote:The only good thing about FVU is their back line, but beyond that? Nothing. Their “game plan” looked like kick-and-chase with no real idea behind it. Whatever their coach is trying to do, it’s not showing on the field... Not to mention how they were barely in Arlington's half the whole game. Also, they continued to get no shots on goal. FVU, may had had hope in the first half but we all still know how that game was going to end..
Love this board… will be hitting refresh later as scores trickle in.