Doubt this passes the Senate but if it does, it will be challenged by states, immediately. Remember "states rights."

And while it will hurt Republicans most at first, red states will suddenly get PO passports back and those will be processed first. FWIW, if you have trouble finding an appointment in DC, try to get one on vacation and while visiting family in other states. Sometimes that's easier. And once there's red-state preference, maybe you can slip in there somehow.

And of the federal govt has our voting history & you’re a Dem and apply for a passport, maybe the understaffed Dept of State will take its own sweet time to process your document.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

This. It’s so obvious. The plan is just to sow uncertainty so Trump can try to pull another coup. Let’s not forget all the screaming he did about mail-in ballots months before the 2020 election. It’s the exact same playbook.

+1
You can also tell by the amount of effort the maga bots are putting into arguing. This will be the new caravans approaching the border.

Yup and they are all lying about "illegal immigrants getting licenses and illegally voting" No this is part of Project 2025 and many people decided that was fake news. It WAS NOT!!!

How do you know they did not? If you don't have ID, it is entirely possible and there have been instances where it is proven.
How do you know who casts the nursing home votes?
Who casts the mail-in votes?

Please provide one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

This. It’s so obvious. The plan is just to sow uncertainty so Trump can try to pull another coup. Let’s not forget all the screaming he did about mail-in ballots months before the 2020 election. It’s the exact same playbook.

+1
You can also tell by the amount of effort the maga bots are putting into arguing. This will be the new caravans approaching the border.

Yup and they are all lying about "illegal immigrants getting licenses and illegally voting" No this is part of Project 2025 and many people decided that was fake news. It WAS NOT!!!

How do you know they did not? If you don't have ID, it is entirely possible and there have been instances where it is proven.
How do you know who casts the nursing home votes?
Who casts the mail-in votes?

Please give an example of when illegal voting EVER came even remotely close to affecting the outcome of an election. If it’s so widespread, you should be able to prove it.

Is it legal or a poll tax? Only way to solve this is in the courts. If it passes congress, still not sure it would actually get implemented before 2026 midterms with all the inevitable court cases against that will be filed, likely eventually ending up before the Supreme Court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

This. It’s so obvious. The plan is just to sow uncertainty so Trump can try to pull another coup. Let’s not forget all the screaming he did about mail-in ballots months before the 2020 election. It’s the exact same playbook.

+1
You can also tell by the amount of effort the maga bots are putting into arguing. This will be the new caravans approaching the border.

Yup and they are all lying about "illegal immigrants getting licenses and illegally voting" No this is part of Project 2025 and many people decided that was fake news. It WAS NOT!!!

How do you know they did not? If you don't have ID, it is entirely possible and there have been instances where it is proven.
How do you know who casts the nursing home votes?
Who casts the mail-in votes?

Ok sure sure...I think with this logic since we are so so worried about those illegal immigrants with fake id's men should also have to prove themselves-bring birth certificates real ones....we wouldn't want any man voting with a fake id Now what do we do about those with more than one address voting in more than one state....hmmmm Mark Meadows pulled this stunt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

This. It’s so obvious. The plan is just to sow uncertainty so Trump can try to pull another coup. Let’s not forget all the screaming he did about mail-in ballots months before the 2020 election. It’s the exact same playbook.

+1
You can also tell by the amount of effort the maga bots are putting into arguing. This will be the new caravans approaching the border.

Yup and they are all lying about "illegal immigrants getting licenses and illegally voting" No this is part of Project 2025 and many people decided that was fake news. It WAS NOT!!!

How do you know they did not? If you don't have ID, it is entirely possible and there have been instances where it is proven.
How do you know who casts the nursing home votes?
Who casts the mail-in votes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

This. It’s so obvious. The plan is just to sow uncertainty so Trump can try to pull another coup. Let’s not forget all the screaming he did about mail-in ballots months before the 2020 election. It’s the exact same playbook.

+1
You can also tell by the amount of effort the maga bots are putting into arguing. This will be the new caravans approaching the border.

Yup and they are all lying about "illegal immigrants getting licenses and illegally voting" No this is part of Project 2025 and many people decided that was fake news. It WAS NOT!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read conflicting information about this: I am a married woman, and have my US passport with my married name, would that be enough proof?

I also saw somebody mention naturalized citizens and needing their home birth certificate. But if you have your naturalized citizen paperwork, your US passport, your real ID would you be affected?

No, it would not be enough, unless you brought your marriage license with you to vote, or reverted to your maiden name on all of your documents, matching your birth certificate.

Can you point me to where it says you must use your birth certificate to prove citizenship and why wouldn’t the US passport be enough?

I think the passport would be enough from my reading.

But my bet is that they will target Democrats and try to nullify whatever documentation they have.

This. A vindictive and vengeful administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read conflicting information about this: I am a married woman, and have my US passport with my married name, would that be enough proof?

I also saw somebody mention naturalized citizens and needing their home birth certificate. But if you have your naturalized citizen paperwork, your US passport, your real ID would you be affected?

Yes, apparently a Passport would work, but most Americans don't have a passport, and even fewer republican women ahhahahhaa.

So that's when they would need the driver's licence/state id PLUS birth certificate or other documentation?

Yes and they have to match, hence the problem for anyone who has changed their name.

So in that case, it would be the drivers license (married last name) plus marriage certificate?

Plus birth certificate.

And neither the nmarriage certificate nor the birth certificate can be anything other than a state certified document. Copies not allowed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read conflicting information about this: I am a married woman, and have my US passport with my married name, would that be enough proof?

I also saw somebody mention naturalized citizens and needing their home birth certificate. But if you have your naturalized citizen paperwork, your US passport, your real ID would you be affected?

Yes, apparently a Passport would work, but most Americans don't have a passport, and even fewer republican women ahhahahhaa.

So that's when they would need the driver's licence/state id PLUS birth certificate or other documentation?

Yes and they have to match, hence the problem for anyone who has changed their name.

So in that case, it would be the drivers license (married last name) plus marriage certificate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read conflicting information about this: I am a married woman, and have my US passport with my married name, would that be enough proof?

I also saw somebody mention naturalized citizens and needing their home birth certificate. But if you have your naturalized citizen paperwork, your US passport, your real ID would you be affected?

Yes, apparently a Passport would work, but most Americans don't have a passport, and even fewer republican women ahhahahhaa.

So that's when they would need the driver's licence/state id PLUS birth certificate or other documentation?

Yes and they have to match, hence the problem for anyone who has changed their name.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read conflicting information about this: I am a married woman, and have my US passport with my married name, would that be enough proof?

I also saw somebody mention naturalized citizens and needing their home birth certificate. But if you have your naturalized citizen paperwork, your US passport, your real ID would you be affected?

Yes, apparently a Passport would work, but most Americans don't have a passport, and even fewer republican women ahhahahhaa.

So that's when they would need the driver's licence/state id PLUS birth certificate or other documentation?

Anonymous wrote:As a Democrat- I am fine with the SAVE act passing because of the following:
-wealthy Democrats have a passport
-more conservative women change their name at marriage so they are more impacted
-more college educated people have a passport (only 1 in 4 non-college grads have one)
-if you earn under 50K- only 1 in 5 have a passport and these are most likely republicans.

I like when Republicans shoot themselves in the foot so pass it.

You call yourself a Democrat but don't value democracy? In a democracy, everyone with the right to vote should not face obstacles to exercise that right. No matter how they are registered, how much money they make, or their marriage status.

And believing this law will be implemented in such a way as to benefit democrats is as naive as it is despicable. We can win elections without suppressing the vote. Republicans can't.

Doesn't this mean men also have to bring a birth certificate to vote?