Anonymous
04/12/2026 17:44
Subject: Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the rumor is that Lucas was able to get the veto because she wants the NOVA data centers to be heavily taxed but the NOVA dems wouldn't agree to it, so she was able to get the veto on the casino (which was going to be the source of tax revenue in place of taxing data centers) and now no casino money.
I wonder how she was able to get Spanberger to do it.
Louise Lucas loves gambling. Why did she want a veto? I think spanberger vetoed it because of the huge community protests.
I literally wrote in the post you replied to why Lucas would want the veto. Did you read it?
Anonymous
04/12/2026 10:07
Subject: Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the rumor is that Lucas was able to get the veto because she wants the NOVA data centers to be heavily taxed but the NOVA dems wouldn't agree to it, so she was able to get the veto on the casino (which was going to be the source of tax revenue in place of taxing data centers) and now no casino money.
I wonder how she was able to get Spanberger to do it.
Louise Lucas loves gambling. Why did she want a veto? I think spanberger vetoed it because of the huge community protests.
This. The citizens in Fairfax don't want this casino that's being forced on them and Spanberger knows it.
Anonymous
04/10/2026 19:27
Subject: Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the rumor is that Lucas was able to get the veto because she wants the NOVA data centers to be heavily taxed but the NOVA dems wouldn't agree to it, so she was able to get the veto on the casino (which was going to be the source of tax revenue in place of taxing data centers) and now no casino money.
I wonder how she was able to get Spanberger to do it.
Louise Lucas loves gambling. Why did she want a veto? I think spanberger vetoed it because of the huge community protests.
I agree. Some Democrats were waiting to vote on the redistricting amendment until they had seen what Spanberger did with the casino bill. She vetoed it, and now they’ll go ahead and vote “yes” on the amendment. Sleazy Scott Surovell was going to deliver MAGA a victory on April 21st if she let the bill become law.
Anonymous
04/10/2026 19:03
Subject: Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?
Anonymous wrote:So the rumor is that Lucas was able to get the veto because she wants the NOVA data centers to be heavily taxed but the NOVA dems wouldn't agree to it, so she was able to get the veto on the casino (which was going to be the source of tax revenue in place of taxing data centers) and now no casino money.
I wonder how she was able to get Spanberger to do it.
Louise Lucas loves gambling. Why did she want a veto? I think spanberger vetoed it because of the huge community protests.