Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
But she's not helping her child. She's presenting a false world.
I literally do not understand this take. The marriage is between mom and dad. Marriages end all the time for a lot of reasons. The parent relationship is between the kid and parent. The parents have autonomy to decide if they want to continue to be in their marriage. They can leave at any time for any reason. And the reasons are almost always complex.
A child, even a 15 year old, does not have a full grasp on complicated long term romantic relationships and marriage. They just do not. So any situation where you are providing intimate details and selling a side is like...putting a physics proof on the chalkboard of an english class. Maybe they have some ideas/understanding depending on their age, but they really do not have enough of a grasp on your marriage to get something meaningful out of telling them something in isolation.
And again, as people have said over and over, by getting into the weeds with the kid, you're passing on responsibility to act to them. You're asking them to have an opinion or reaction to that that is tied to how they feel about you.
I know the cheated upons don't want to admit this because they have shown here for the last 20 pages that they live a life of sweeping generalizations and stereotypes rather than in a nuanced world of flawed human individuals who are all different, when someone decides to leave a marriage, they do not also decide to not be a parent. Certainly their relationship with the child is EFFECTED, but it isn't DETERMINED by the ending of a marriage. And a CHILD is better off when both parents are loving and committed to their wellbeing and facilitate their having a loving relationship with the other parent.
So by ensuring your kid knows what's important for THEM (ie, the marriage is ending because of something very serious that occurred between mom and dad but something that has nothing to do with you, child, and you will be fine because this is where I am going to live and this is where Dad is going to live and this is when you'll go back and forth and we just want you to know we both love you very much) versus what is important for YOU (your dad slept with his secretary MELINDA so im KICKING HIM OUT) you are not creating a false world. It is only false if you make it so. Plenty of divorced couples live in a way to make that first version 100% true. It is only false if you decide its more important for the kid to hate the other parent then to grow up feeling stable and loved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gaslight the whole family. Base family history on lies and secrets, what could go wrong?
You can keep calling it this but that doesn’t make it true. Of course sometimes it’s true but again the problem is generally terrible parenting not the decision to give your children age appropriate information
Anonymous wrote:Gaslight the whole family. Base family history on lies and secrets, what could go wrong?
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never once seen a cheating parent advocate for telling, which tells me that hiding the truth is not really about the best interest of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
But she's not helping her child. She's presenting a false world.
I literally do not understand this take. The marriage is between mom and dad. Marriages end all the time for a lot of reasons. The parent relationship is between the kid and parent. The parents have autonomy to decide if they want to continue to be in their marriage. They can leave at any time for any reason. And the reasons are almost always complex.
A child, even a 15 year old, does not have a full grasp on complicated long term romantic relationships and marriage. They just do not. So any situation where you are providing intimate details and selling a side is like...putting a physics proof on the chalkboard of an english class. Maybe they have some ideas/understanding depending on their age, but they really do not have enough of a grasp on your marriage to get something meaningful out of telling them something in isolation.
And again, as people have said over and over, by getting into the weeds with the kid, you're passing on responsibility to act to them. You're asking them to have an opinion or reaction to that that is tied to how they feel about you.
I know the cheated upons don't want to admit this because they have shown here for the last 20 pages that they live a life of sweeping generalizations and stereotypes rather than in a nuanced world of flawed human individuals who are all different, when someone decides to leave a marriage, they do not also decide to not be a parent. Certainly their relationship with the child is EFFECTED, but it isn't DETERMINED by the ending of a marriage. And a CHILD is better off when both parents are loving and committed to their wellbeing and facilitate their having a loving relationship with the other parent.
So by ensuring your kid knows what's important for THEM (ie, the marriage is ending because of something very serious that occurred between mom and dad but something that has nothing to do with you, child, and you will be fine because this is where I am going to live and this is where Dad is going to live and this is when you'll go back and forth and we just want you to know we both love you very much) versus what is important for YOU (your dad slept with his secretary MELINDA so im KICKING HIM OUT) you are not creating a false world. It is only false if you make it so. Plenty of divorced couples live in a way to make that first version 100% true. It is only false if you decide its more important for the kid to hate the other parent then to grow up feeling stable and loved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
This!
Why can’t the ex be in charge of his good relationship with his own child? Cheating doesn’t hurt just the adults in the family; it hurts the entire family. Pets even suffer; family pets are often abandoned at shelters because living arrangements after divorce change and pets cannot be taken to the new apartment or rental home. Families lose their homes, too. Cheating and the resulting divorce is often catastrophic and completely changes everything.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never once seen a cheating parent advocate for telling, which tells me that hiding the truth is not really about the best interest of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
But she's not helping her child. She's presenting a false world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
This!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I want nothing to damage my kid’s relationship with my ex.
I don't understand why your need to help your ex trumps your own relationship with your kids and your own relationship with yourself. Why do you keep needing to help your ex? If the kids see him/her on their own and you made the divorce not about them what difference does it make? I really don't understand how hiding something someone did helps anyone. This is where we differ. If we really want our children to accept us as who we are and accept themselves as who they are, we have to actually be who we are.
She's not helping her ex. She's helping her kid, who is better off if they have a good relationship with her ex. And she cares about her kid's wellbeing more than she cares about hurting her ex so is comfortable doing something that will be good for her child, even if a side effect is that it will help her ex.
Your lack of understanding that is truly at the crux of the argument between the two sides here.
Anonymous wrote:I was not born in America, so I can't relate to this American thing where cheating is seen as the highest level of evil, but then also Americans are willing to vote for a president who cheated on his wife with a porn star, while his wife was pregnant.
Anonymous wrote:I am the kid in this situation and figured it out when I was 22. It's very hard to keep a secret lifelong if you'd tat with the AP. I would rather have been told, and not lied to when I asked directly. I feel like they lied to me to manipulate me into accepting his new wife, and to avoid dealing with my reaction. Very self-serving behavior that was not with my best interest at heart.