Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prep lost their best LSM and Face-Off guy, they will be hard to replace. Prep does have 2 of the best attackmen in the area and a bunch of other excellent players, but it will be interesting to see how they perform without winning 75%+ of all the face-offs.
I think Prep takes a dip and will come in 3rd this year-behind Bullis and St Albans.
SJC, Gonzaga, DeMatha and Paul VI will be a good battle with SJC holding a slight edge to win WCAC
Prep replaced the old LSM during the IAC Championship last spring. The new starting LSM is good and committed to Notre Dame. They will be fine and might actually play better as a team. They have the talent and depth, it’s now up to the coach and captains to bring them together as a team.
Anonymous wrote:Prep lost their best LSM and Face-Off guy, they will be hard to replace. Prep does have 2 of the best attackmen in the area and a bunch of other excellent players, but it will be interesting to see how they perform without winning 75%+ of all the face-offs.
I think Prep takes a dip and will come in 3rd this year-behind Bullis and St Albans.
SJC, Gonzaga, DeMatha and Paul VI will be a good battle with SJC holding a slight edge to win WCAC
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Bullis
2. SJC
3. Prep
4. Albans
5. DeMatha
6. Gonzaga
7. Landon
8. PVI
9. Heights
10. SSSAS
Bullis undoubedtly the top team in the area, SJC can play them close. Prep top 2 attack are hard to handle. Albans turns some heads. Dave leads an admirable 2nd season at DeMatha. Gonzaga + Landon struggle. PVI poorly coached. Heights finally has the talent to cause some impact. SSSAS weak as theyve been for years!
Heights was better last year Albans is way too high. SSSAS is down this year.
All of this wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But they have to play as a team. I’ve seen teams that overflow with talent yet can’t get it done. Look at Cuse.
Look at Prep. PVI as well coaching hurts ten
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Bullis
2. SJC
3. Prep
4. Albans
5. DeMatha
6. Gonzaga
7. Landon
8. PVI
9. Heights
10. SSSAS
Bullis undoubedtly the top team in the area, SJC can play them close. Prep top 2 attack are hard to handle. Albans turns some heads. Dave leads an admirable 2nd season at DeMatha. Gonzaga + Landon struggle. PVI poorly coached. Heights finally has the talent to cause some impact. SSSAS weak as theyve been for years!
Heights was better last year Albans is way too high. SSSAS is down this year.
All of this wrong.
Anonymous wrote:1. Bullis
2. SJC
3. Prep
4. Albans
5. DeMatha
6. Gonzaga
7. Landon
8. PVI
9. Heights
10. SSSAS
Bullis undoubedtly the top team in the area, SJC can play them close. Prep top 2 attack are hard to handle. Albans turns some heads. Dave leads an admirable 2nd season at DeMatha. Gonzaga + Landon struggle. PVI poorly coached. Heights finally has the talent to cause some impact. SSSAS weak as theyve been for years!
Anonymous wrote:But they have to play as a team. I’ve seen teams that overflow with talent yet can’t get it done. Look at Cuse.
Anonymous wrote:How much depth does a high school team need? This is the minimum.
3 attack
3 defenders
1 LSM
5 midfielders
1 FO
1 Goalie
This group has to be very talented, in great shape and the temperatures can't get above 80.
More players will be needed for practice and as long as injuries are not occurring you can get by with a small roster.
I think depth is great, but not necessary.
Well they have a great LSM a good FO two good defenders and a good goalie v teams that have 11-12 of = or greater talent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any chance we go back to early reviews on the upcoming season?
In order for Spring 2023
1. SJC
2. Bullis
3. Georgetown Prep
4. Gonzaga
5. Landon
6. SS/SA
7. PVI
8. STA
9. DeMatha
10. Madison (VA Public)