Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You realize that McAuliffe has already been governor, right? This “socialist dystopia” that I’m seeing referenced to here didn’t happen. Virginia under the democratic governors has been a pretty well run state with reasonable taxes. Some of the things people are complaining about - permits, school things - are local elections. I made some non-D choices in my local elections, but for the state and federal, no way would I vote for what passes as the Republican Party today.

Yep and he can't seem to point to any accomplishments or efforts to highlight which is why people aren't voting for him. He's a Clinton campaign hack and the last thing we need right now - straight liars.

Youngkin is a liar.

Did you vote for Princess?

So you say and no. It wasn't Youngkin's campaign that had party operatives standing out in the rain under opposition property trying to fabricate a falsehood. LIARS.

It was performance art to remind voters of the type of people who supports Youngkin, who is linked closely to Trump, the worst president in history.

Exactly. “Both sides”.

And it wasn’t campaign staffers. You guys still owe them apologies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who continue to insist that The Lincoln Project is Republican, here is a thread with how closely they are connected with Democrats......He has receipts.

And, he summarizes his tweet thread with a tweet that reads:

Tl;dr the Lincoln Project:
- Employs the bank used by all top Democrats, @AmalgamatedBank
- Employs @NGPVAN, which controls the @DNC's voter file
- Receives tens of millions of dollars from liberal billionaires and small dollar donors
- Is not a GOP group *at all*

And, if you want to know where all those donations from liberals went.... pay attention to all the debts these grifters have paid off in the past few years.

Exactly. Thank you!

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who continue to insist that The Lincoln Project is Republican, here is a thread with how closely they are connected with Democrats......He has receipts.

And, he summarizes his tweet thread with a tweet that reads:

Tl;dr the Lincoln Project:
- Employs the bank used by all top Democrats, @AmalgamatedBank
- Employs @NGPVAN, which controls the @DNC's voter file
- Receives tens of millions of dollars from liberal billionaires and small dollar donors
- Is not a GOP group *at all*

And, if you want to know where all those donations from liberals went.... pay attention to all the debts these grifters have paid off in the past few years.

Anonymous wrote:Has Terry been seen or heard from today? Is he still campaigning?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I am going with teachers unions. Parents shouldn’t be telling schools what to teach. I am so done with this era where everyone thinks they know more than experts.

Teachers' unions are not experts. Teachers unions are out to promote themselves--not the teachers and not the schools, and definitely not the students.

signed:
Experienced Teacher who learned this in my first year of teaching. Never saw anything over the years to change my mind.

Oh yeah? Where do you teach? In a public school system, or some kind of unaccredited bible-thumper private? I’m betting the latter based on your absurd post. It reads like typical anti-union trash talking points.


Union teachers are the only bulwark standing between society and the brainwashed spawn being raised and indoctrinated by their rightwing loon parents. If it weren’t for public school teachers offsetting all these idiot parents and their lunacy, we’d be up to our eyeballs in school age little fascists. Teachers are typically the only people exposing these kids to Progressive ideals and questioning the nonsense these children are being fed at home.

Anonymous wrote:Chaz Nuttycombe (liberal pollster, from Virginia Tech) has changed his prediction to say odds Youngkin win have gone up over the last week. He gives multiple updates per day.

Sam Shirazi gives multiple updates per day. He’s optimistic for McAuliffe.

Obviously, these are all predictions. Virginians do not register by party. Many of these pollsters think “Fairfax” or “Arlington” high turnout means all of the early votes are for McAuliffe.

I live here and I know that’s not true at all.

They are making broad assumptions based on historical trends for individual counties; they are not considering social issues (ie Loudoun school board scandal, etc.) in their predictions. I asked one of the pollster specifically if his prediction was “math-based” only. He said ‘yes’; no provisions for current events (Charlottesville stunt yesterday).

Anonymous wrote:You realize that McAuliffe has already been governor, right? This “socialist dystopia” that I’m seeing referenced to here didn’t happen. Virginia under the democratic governors has been a pretty well run state with reasonable taxes. Some of the things people are complaining about - permits, school things - are local elections. I made some non-D choices in my local elections, but for the state and federal, no way would I vote for what passes as the Republican Party today.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a conservative, but I also read a lot of news from liberal pollsters. They seemed to be mainly concerned about extremely low turnout in Norfolk/Newport News area. The numbers coming out of early voting from that area are very bad (that’s why McAuliffe was there yesterday and today).

Another good source I check daily is vpap.org. Click on the “Early Voting” tab. You can see turnout by county, comparisons with 2020 and 2017 elections, etc.’

Dave Wasserman is another reputable political analyst. He has posted a spreadsheet of the percentages Youngkin needs to hit in each county to beat McAuliffe.

Younking getting huge crowed in Virginia Beach, Norfolk, and Chesapeake. I don't know if this is because Miyares is local there and very liked or other reasons, but the number of support for him is unprecedented in Hampton Roads.

Anonymous wrote: